942
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Morphological traits and vertical distribution of hyporheic chironomid larvae in Atlantic Forest streams

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 119-134 | Received 11 Apr 2018, Accepted 28 Jun 2019, Published online: 27 Aug 2019

Abstract

Hyporheic zone is an active ecotone constituted by the interstitial spaces between the particles of the riverbed. The use of morphological traits can be useful to detect organisms distribution patterns in these areas. Information concerning hyporheic communities are scarce as well on chironomid vertical distribution. Fauna samples from the hyporheic zone were collected at three depths and in four microhabitats. Eighteen genera were recorded and 13 morphological traits were identified. The results indicate that the distribution patterns of hyporheic chironomid taxa vary according to depth and microhabitat. Spatial preferences for riffles habitats are evident, and the vertical distribution is correlated with morphological traits like body size, pseudopods and mentum. Faunal abundance and richness decreased with depth and the vertical distribution influenced the chironomid morphological traits. We conclude that the use of morphological trait can introduce new useful information about the distribution of hyporheic fauna.

http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E1DDF958-AA8C-40FD-A0D5-F281AA4AEA04

Introduction

The hyporheic zone (HZ) was formally nominated by Orghidan (Citation1959) and Käser (Citation2010) and for this environment there is no single conceptual definition due to different terminologies, methodologies and dogma among biologists, hydrologists and geomorphologists (Smith Citation2005; Boulton et al. Citation2010). The HZ can be defined as an active ecotone constituted by the interstitial spaces between the particles of the riverbed (Gibert et al. Citation1990). The HZ comprises the subsurface interface between streamwater and subsurface water that comprises the saturated sediments beneath the benthic zone that exchanges water with both the surface stream and the underlying groundwater (Dahm and Valett Citation1996; Bencala Citation2000, Citation2005; Mugnai et al. Citation2015a).

Three categories of hyporheic organisms can be distinguished in the HZ: (1) stygoxenes that have no affinity with the subterranean environment and are present only accidentally; (2) stygophiles that actively exploit the resources in this environment for part of their lifecycle; and (3) stygobites that are adapted to subterranean environments and complete their lifecycle in subsurface waters (see Gibert et al. Citation1994; Claret et al. Citation1999; Malard et al. Citation2002). The stygophiles can be subdivided into three categories. The occasional hyporheos, species that have no affinities with the underground environment and that occur in it only accidentally, amphibite species that have a lifecycle that requires both surface and subsurface environments, as some insects that use the hyporheic zone as nursery, and the permanent hyporheos that can spend their entire lifecycle in subsurface waters. Chironomidae family as some Nearctic and Palearctic genera of Plecoptera (e.g. Paraperla Banks, 1906, Isocapnia Banks, 1938, Kathroperla Banks, 1920, and probably Paraleuctra Hanson, 1941) are classified as amphibites (Sabater and Vila Citation1992; Gibert et al. Citation1994; Berg Citation1995; DeWalt and Stewart Citation1995; Culver and Pipan Citation2009; Stark et al. Citation2013).

Insect larvae use the HZ to protect against competition or predation and as nursery and refuge from the movement of the substrate or from environmental variations due to seasonal flooding and drought (Dole-Oliver et al. Citation1997; Lencioni et al. Citation2008; James and Suren Citation2009; Stubbington Citation2012). Many studies document that chironomid larvae are ubiquitous and abundant in rivers, often contributing substantially to the energy balance of various habitats (Reynolds and Benke Citation2006). Chironomidae family plays an important role on transfer of energy on aquatic ecosystems by consuming organic matter and becoming an abundant prey (Serra et al. Citation2016). Many species are capable of using various types of substrate and several exhibit preferences for a certain substrate type (Henriques-Oliveira et al. Citation2003; Siqueira et al. Citation2008; Rosa et al. Citation2011). Chironomid larvae as well as other macroinvertebrates are generally confined to shallow layer of sediments, mainly the first 15 cm (Bo et al. Citation2006) but some species actively explore a wide vertical section of the riverbed penetrated deeper and are an important component of the hyporheic fauna ( Godbout and Hynes Citation1982; Bo et al. Citation2006; Lencioni et al. Citation2008).

The hyporheic fauna generally varies with depth (Malard et al. Citation2002), nature of the substrate that can influence animals' ability to move, settle, gather food and find shelter (Olsen et al. Citation2001; Omesová and Helešic Citation2007; Omesová et al. Citation2008), and hyporheic water exchange (Harvey and Wagner Citation2000). In the HZ, in contrast to the surface stream, the water flow is laminar and not unidirectional, and the pressure gradient generated by the flow from the irregular riverbed induces the water to move into and out of the riverbed (Thibodeaux and Boyle Citation1987; Hutchinson and Webster Citation1998). The pattern of this exchange regulates the physical and chemical conditions, determining patterns of microbial activity and the occurrence of hyporheic fauna (Franken et al. Citation2001; Olsen and Townsend Citation2003; Mugnai et al. Citation2015b).

Research on the HZ in Neotropics is still a challenge due to the paucity of basic information (Mugnai et al. Citation2015a). The ecology of many invertebrate taxa found in the HZ of Neotropical streams is almost unknown, particularly for amphibite species. In Brazil, as elsewhere in the Neotropical Region, information concerning stygoxene or stygophile species is scarce. Such information is important to understand the lifecycles of the species that occupy the HZ, which represents seminal information for conservation plans and the establishment of standards for biomonitoring programs.

This is the first study that uses Chironomidae morphological traits in response to depth in hyporheic zone. The trait approach is widely used in North America and Europe (Poff et al. Citation2006; Tachet et al. Citation2010; Serra et al. Citation2016), but for Chironomidae the knowledge is scarce (see Serra et al. Citation2016). We analyzed only Chironomidae body morphology, which did not confer functional traits. However, Chironomidae are used in monitoring programs as a measure for environmental integrity and the morphological information can be used to explain their distribution patterns.

The aim of the present study was to describe the hyporheic chironomid community and its vertical distribution in the HZ at a depth between 10 and 45 cm in a stream at Atlantic Forest in Brazil. Our hypotheses were: (a) faunal density and diversity decrease with depth; (b) the vertical distribution will influence the morphological traits composition (McGill et al. Citation2006); and (c) that organisms will show a preference for microhabitats, constituted by depositional areas, with higher size grains which facilitated fauna locomotion. The study also shows the performance of a new sampling methodology.

Materials and methods

Study area

The Tijuca National Park is located entirely in the urban area of the city of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), between 22°55′ and 23°00′S and 43°11′ and 43°19′W, with an area of approximately 32 km2. The vegetation is characteristic of the Atlantic Forest (Martins Citation2011). The climate is humid tropical with annual average temperature between 20 °C and 25 °C and an annual rainfall of >1,500 mm. The annual distribution of rain is characterized by only two seasons: the rainy season, between November and February (>250 mm/month), and the dry season, from June to September (<100 mm/month). The geological substratum type is predominantly granite (Brasil Citation1987).

Invertebrate samples were collected in June 2012 in two stream reaches (P I: 22°57′35.68″S, 43°16′33.54″W, 530 m altitude; P II: 22°57′13.08″S, 43°16′55.45″W, 475 m altitude), located in the first and second orders (sensu Strahler Citation1957) of the Tijuca River, respectively (). The sampling sites are quite different. In the first order site (P I), boulders cover 80% of the riverbed, and sand fills the cavities between these rocks, and the transversal section of riverbed is concave. The second order site (P II) is less steep, sand represents 60% of the riverbed, the rest is constituted by cobble and coarse gravel, with regular riffles and pools, and the transversal section of the riverbed is flat.

Figure 1 Map of the study area indicating the sampling sites (P I and P II) in the Tijuca River, Tijuca National Park, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil.

Figure 1 Map of the study area indicating the sampling sites (P I and P II) in the Tijuca River, Tijuca National Park, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil.

Sampling methodology

In each site, PVC mini-piezometers with 2.6 cm of diameter were positioned for collecting samples at three depths: 10, 25 and 45 cm. The design of a traditional piezometer (Lee and Cherry Citation1978; Valett Citation1993; Malard et al. Citation2002) was modified, reducing the 20 cm height of the perforated band (hole was 0.5 cm) to 5 cm to allow stratified sampling (Mugnai et al. Citation2015c) ().

Figure 2 Mini-piezometers and the position of the perforated bands at the different sampling depths.

Figure 2 Mini-piezometers and the position of the perforated bands at the different sampling depths.

For each depth, five mini-piezometers were positioned in four different habitats: upstream of riffles (A); downstream of riffles (B); lateral side of pools (C); and in areas of sand accumulation (bars, curves) (D), amounting to 30 mini-piezometers. Each mini-piezometer was distributed at a minimum distance of 1.5 m in order to ensure the independence of the samples (Boulton and Marmonier Citation2007).

Samples were collected using a modified Bou-Rouch pump (Vigna Taglianti et al. Citation1969). For each mini-piezometer, five samples of water were collected (Malard et al. Citation2002; Boulton et al. Citation2004). To separate fine sediment, particulate organic matter (POM) and invertebrates, the samples were elutriated in the field, filtered with a 68 µm mesh, and preserved in 75% ethanol. In the laboratory, the material was stained with rose bengal for 48 h before sorting.

Identification, morphology and statistical analyses

For microscopic study, Chironomidae larvae were slide-mounted using Euparal (Epler Citation2001; Mugnai and Serpa-Filho Citation2015). Identification was made using Trivinho-Strixino (Citation2011). Larval body length was measured from the head (excluding mandibles) to the tip of the abdomen. All individuals are deposited at the Entomological Collection of Museu Nacional/UFRJ.

For the analysis, samples are considered as replications according to Hurlbert (Citation1984) and Magurran (Citation2004). Comparing: three different depths (10, 25 and 45 cm) and four different habitats typologies (upstream of riffles, downstream of riffles, lateral side of pools and in areas of sand accumulation), considering each sample spatially independent. The sampling effectiveness was evaluated by a sample rarefaction test (collector curve) with genera data. The tests were performed using the program EstimateS 9.1 (Colwell Citation2013) and the sample rarefaction test showed that the sampling methodology for Chironomidae was efficient ().

Figure 3 Sample rarefaction tests, error 5%, for Chironomid larvae at P I and P II sampling sites in Tijuca river, Rio de Janeiro.

Figure 3 Sample rarefaction tests, error 5%, for Chironomid larvae at P I and P II sampling sites in Tijuca river, Rio de Janeiro.

Chironomidae richness and abundance (log transformed) were calculated and the values were compared among depths and habitats. To analyze morphological traits and feeding habits a database including information about body size and morpho-anatomical characters, totalizing 13 traits was done by literature revision (except for body size) (). To calculate the frequency of each morphological trait we used the species trait (binary code) and weighted by the individual abundance in each depth and habitat. We evaluated the effect of depth on richness, abundance and traits with analyses of variance (ANOVA) using Tukey test a posteriori. We added a block factor on the ANOVA, considering each sample as a block. The statistical analyses and graphics were performed with the open software package R (R Development Core Team Citation2013).

Table 1 Chironomidae genera and 13 morphological characteristics (traits).

Results

From 30 hyporheic samples, a total of 1,069 individuals were collected. Of these individuals, 382 (36%) belonged to Insecta, 351 belonged to Crustacea and the remaining 336 were equally distributed among Hydrachnidia, Nematoda and Annelida. Diptera dominated among Insecta (334 individuals). Chironomidae represented 22% of the total fauna and 62% of the insects.

Chironomidae assemblage description

Of the 238 chironomid individuals, 199 were identified at genus level, 13 were identified at subfamily level and 26 were identified only to family level, due to the poor condition and the development stage of the individuals ().

Table 2 Abundance of Chironomid genera at different depth and habitats, and total abundance (%) for each depth.

Seventeen genera were found at a depth of 10 cm. Specifically, 15 genera were found at sampling site P I (Ablabesmyia Johannsen, 1905; Beardius Reiss & Sublette, 1985; Caladomyia Säwedal, 1981; Corynoneura Winnertz, 1846; Cricotopus van der Wulp, 1874; Djalmabatista Fittkau, 1968; Fittkauimyia Karunakaran, 1969; Labrundinia Fittkau, 1962; Larsia Fittkau, 1962; Lopescladius Oliveira, 1967; Metriocnemus van der Wulp, 1874; Phaenopsectra Kieffer, 1921; Polypedilum Kieffer, 1912; Tanytarsus van der Wulp, 1874; and Ubatubaneura Wiedenbrug & Trivinho-Strixino, 2009) and 11 genera were found at sampling site P II (Ablabesmyia; Corynoneura; Cricotopus; Cryptochironomus Kieffer, 1918; Djalmabatista; Labrundinia; Larsia; Lopescladius; Paramerina Fittkau, 1962; Polypedilum; and Tanytarsus).

Eleven genera were found at a depth of 25 cm. Seven genera were found at sampling site P I (Caladomyia, Corynoneura, Cricotopus, Djalmabatista, Lopescladius, Metriocnemus, Polypedilum, Tanytarsus, and Xestochironomus) and 10 genera were found at sampling site P II (Ablabesmyia, Corynoneura, Cricotopus, Djalmabatista, Labrundinia, Larsia, Lopescladius, Polypedilum, and Tanytarsus).

At a depth of 45 cm, 17 individuals were found, seven at P I and 10 at P II. All individuals, except one Chironominae (Tanytarsus), were Orthocladiinae. At P I, four individuals of Corynoneura sp. and three individuals of Lopescladius sp. were found. The individuals were found in microhabitats A, C and D. At P II, three individuals of Lopescladius sp., one Cricotopus sp. and one Tanytarsus sp. were found. All of them were found in areas of sand accumulation (habitat D).

The dimensions of individuals ranged from 0.5 to 4.5 mm, with a mean of 1.57 ± 0.68 mm. Corynoneura and Lopescladius larvae of all sizes were present at all sediment depths. At sampling site P I within a depth of 45 cm, the four individuals of Corynoneura sp. ranged between 1 and 3 mm long and three individuals of Lopescladius sp. ranged between 1.0 and 3.0 mm long. At sampling site P II, three individuals of Lopescladius ranged between 2.5 and 3.0 mm long, one Cricotopus sp. was 1.0 mm long and one Tanytarsus sp. was 2.0 mm long.

The genera Beardius, Metriocnemus, Phaenopsectra, Ubatubaneura and Xestochironomus were found only at P I and Cryptochironomus and Paramerina only at P II. All of these genera were represented by two individuals, except Metriocnemus, which was represented by four individuals.

Chironomidae assemblage structure

Richness and abundance were higher at 10 cm depth (F = 5.19, p = 0.006 and F = 3.46, p = 0.04, respectively (block = p > 0.05) (, respectively). Richness was lower upstream riffles (habitat A) (F3,16 =3.08, p = 0.05, ).

Figure 4 A, richness and B, abundance of chironomid individuals at different depths and sampling sites in Tijuca River, Rio de Janeiro. Different lowercased letters show significative differences.

Figure 4 A, richness and B, abundance of chironomid individuals at different depths and sampling sites in Tijuca River, Rio de Janeiro. Different lowercased letters show significative differences.

Figure 5 Richness at different microhabitats at sampling sites in Tijuca River, Rio de Janeiro. A, upstream of riffles; B, downstream of riffles; C, lateral side of pools; D, areas of sand accumulation (bars, curves). Different lowercased letters show significant differences.

Figure 5 Richness at different microhabitats at sampling sites in Tijuca River, Rio de Janeiro. A, upstream of riffles; B, downstream of riffles; C, lateral side of pools; D, areas of sand accumulation (bars, curves). Different lowercased letters show significant differences.

Analysis of functional traits showed that functional diversity is higher at 45 cm depth, because presented less variation. Individuals found at shallow depth (10 cm) with posterior pseudopods reduced or absent, elongated head and mentum developed were more common in samples from 10, than in the 25 and 45 cm. For 13 traits that we measure, only four were influenced by depth: head elongated, body size, developed mentum and posterior pseudopods reduced or absent ().

Figure 6 Percentage of chironomid morphological characteristics on different depths at sampling sites in Tijuca River, Rio de Janeiro. A, body size; B, elongated head; C, mentum present and developed versus depth; D, posterior pseudopods reduced or absent versus depth.

Figure 6 Percentage of chironomid morphological characteristics on different depths at sampling sites in Tijuca River, Rio de Janeiro. A, body size; B, elongated head; C, mentum present and developed versus depth; D, posterior pseudopods reduced or absent versus depth.

Discussion

The family Chironomidae consists of approximately 20,000 species (Ferrington Citation2008) with 11 subfamilies, five of which are present in Brazil. In the state of Rio de Janeiro, 64 genera occur in the subfamilies Chironominae (35 genera), Orthocladiinae (18), Tanypodinae (10) and Telmatogetoninae (1) (Nessimian et al. Citation2003). In this survey, the presence of Chironomidae in the HZ was confirmed for 18 genera. Regarding the fauna composition, our results contrast with research on HZ Chironomidae distribution done in other countries, particularly in the shallow sediments that indicates Chironominae as the most abundant and diverse subfamily and frequently predominant (e.g. Ford Citation1962; Morris and Brooker Citation1979; Pinder Citation1995; Sherfy et al. Citation2000; Lencioni Citation2004). Moreover, results are in agreement with findings reported by Henriques-Oliveira et al. (Citation2003) that worked in surface sediments of streams in the Tijuca National Park and found Orthocladiinae as dominant in all substrates. The same results were found by Lencioni et al. (Citation2008), who studied the hyporheos in an Alpine stream in Italy.

Similar to epibenthic fauna, hyporheic fauna vary along longitudinal gradients, particularly if the order covaries with altitude, hydraulic condition and substrate granulometry (e.g. Pinder Citation1995; Principe et al. Citation2008; Puntí et al. Citation2009). All this factors influenced by the inclination and concavity of the riverbed and consequently causing changes in species assemblages; this last varying increasing downstream in both density and diversity (Anderson et al. Citation2005). The surface Orthocladiinae are easily found in rapids and riffles, whereas Chironominae are found in pools in lowlands or lentic waters (Pinder Citation1986, Citation1995).

In relation to the vertical distribution, two of the general hypotheses, fauna density and diversity decreasing with depth, were confirmed. For Chironomidae, some authors (e.g. Coffman and Ferrington Citation1996; Sherfy et al. Citation2000) report that vertical distribution is related to the instar. The genera Corynoneura and Lopescladius, for example, were present at all three depths and were dominant at 45 cm depth, where individuals of all sizes occurred. The genera Labrundinia was present until a depth of 25 cm and varied in size between 1.0 and 2.7 mm at a depth of 10 cm and between 1 and 2.5 mm at a depth of 25 cm.

Moreover, the study of traits allows us to score species along a continuum of dissimilarity (Pinder Citation1995; McGill et al. Citation2006; Petchey and Gaston Citation2006) and shows other relationships with environmental factors. Four traits were influenced by depth: head elongated, body size, developed mentum and posterior pseudopods reduced or absent. These four traits probably determine the distribution of chironomidae on hyphoreic zone. We can infer that in shallow depth, organisms had longer body, probably because it is easy for large organisms stay in this zone. If organisms need to go deep on hyporheic zone, the pseudopods would help and in shallow depths we detect more chironomidae without pseudopods. Chironomidae with developed mentum were most abundant in shallow zones due to availability of food resources that were higher in shallow than in deep zones. Omesová and Helešic (Citation2007) and Omesová et al. (Citation2008) showed that the distribution of hyporheic fauna is influenced by size, form, appendages and flexibility. We can infer that to reach deeper layers the different genera of chironomidae developed a variety of characteristics for adaptation to deeper depths. Each organism has a different type of morphological body trait which allows them to remain at this depth. Bo et al. (Citation2006), for example, found small or medium-sized organisms, short-lived crawlers, with aquatic respiration and flexible, cylindrical shaped or elongated bodies as the most common attributes of taxa found in the subsurface zone.

At the local scale, factors such as riparian vegetation, environmental quality, water temperature, hydraulic conditions and grain size influence the spatial distribution and species assemblages of epibenthic macroinvertebrates (e.g. Rossaro Citation1991; Jacobsen et al. Citation1997; Roque et al. Citation2003; Kleine and Trivinho-Strixino Citation2005; McKie et al. Citation2005; Sonoda et al. Citation2009; Reynolds and Benke Citation2012). In relation to the microhabitat distribution B and C showed higher richness. This can be due to two main factors. First, the coarse sediment that provided a microhabitat with large interstitial spaces and a major supply of oxygen and nutrients as suggested by Reynolds and Benke (Citation2012) who found different chironomid productivity in different substrates. Second, the hydraulic conditions of the stream environment (Buffagni et al. Citation2010). Dent et al. (Citation2000) reported that different points of the stream are different in relation to hyporheic exchange according to the local geomorphologic structure. In our case, microhabitats A are preferential local of upwelling and B, C and D of downwelling. The hyporheic fauna is strongly influenced by the hyporheic exchanges, characterized principally by direction and strength of flux (Hahn Citation2006). The downwelling surface water and the upwelling hyporheic water zones differ significantly in terms of the temperature, pH, redox potential, and the dissolved oxygen and nitrate levels (Brunke and Gonser Citation1997; Franken et al. Citation2001). In general, downwelling waters have high dissolved oxygen, organic matter, nutrients and subsurface fauna. Conversely, upwelling waters have low dissolved oxygen, organic matter, nutrients and subsurface or underground fauna. Because of these characteristics the richness was low in habitat A.

In relation to feeding habits, not included in the analyses, some authors (e.g. Berg Citation1995; Sanseverino and Nessimian Citation2008) have reported that the majority of chironomid larvae are generalist and nonselective feeders, ingesting food items in the proportion they occur in the surrounding water. According to Berg (Citation1995), many factors such as larval size, quality and type of sediment influence the feeding behavior of chironomid larvae. Most groups that are predators, such as Tanypodinae, are present in the upper layers. In relation to the feeding habits, the five genera found at 45 cm depth have the similar diets including microalgae and detritus (Henriques-Oliveira et al. Citation2003; Saito and Fonseca-Gessner Citation2014).

Studies of hyporheic fauna and ecology have undoubtedly been slowed by the fact that quantitative sampling of the hyporheic zone is considerably more difficult than surface sampling in streams (Reynolds and Benke Citation2012). Sampling methods for studying vertical distribution include coring (Sherfy et al. Citation2000), freezing coring (Pugsley and Hynes Citation1983; Marchant Citation1988), are all developed for potamal habitats (Lencioni et al. Citation2008), colonization samplers and pumping methods (Mugnai et al. Citation2015a; Reynolds and Benke Citation2012). Some have been criticized because of disturbance during installation and removal, loss of animals by leakage during removal, use of unnatural substrata and high effort in the field or financial cost (Reynolds and Benke Citation2012). The modified mini-piezometers presented here are efficient as shown by the sample rarefaction test, are low cost, allowing seasonal samplings in the same point and allowing an alternative method for collecting stratified samples.

Conclusion

The present work represents the first attempt to study the chironomid community and its vertical distribution in the HZ in Neotropical streams. The study also shows sampling performance with a new methodology. Human activity can strongly influence the HZ, not only with water pollution, but also, for example, with deforestation that can cause clogging with fine sand infiltration in the HZ (Pinder Citation1995; Hancock Citation2002; Boulton and Marmonier Citation2007). This can limit the hyporheic exchange, thereby reducing biodiversity and causing extinction of the amphibite species (Malard et al. Citation2002; Bencala Citation2005). Finally, as we predicted, faunal abundance and richness decreased with depth and the vertical distribution influenced the chironomid morphological traits. The use of morphological trait can introduce new information about the distribution of hyporheic fauna and about dynamics and ecology of hyporheic zone. We conclude that more studies are necessary for detecting patterns of Chironomidae community structure and composition in the hyporheic zone.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by CAPES and FAPERJ under Grant no. 87756.

References

  • Anderson JK, Wondzell SM, Gooseff MN, Haggerty R. 2005. Patterns in stream longitudinal profiles and implications for hyporheic exchange flow at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon, USA. Hydrological Process. 19(15):2931–2949.
  • Bencala KE. 2000. Hyporheic zone hydrological processes. Hydrological Process. 14:2797–2798.
  • Bencala KE. 2005. Hyporheic exchange flows. In: Anderson MG, McDonnell JJ, editors. Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons; vol. 3, Chapter 113, p. 733–740.
  • Berg HB. 1995. Larval food and feeding behaviour. In: Armitage PD, Cranston PS, Pinder LCV, editors. The Chironomidae: biology and ecology of non-biting midges. London: Chapman and Hall; p. 136–168.
  • Bo T, Cucco M. Fenoglio S, Malacarne G. 2006. Colonization patterns and vertical movements of stream invertebrates in the interstitial zone: a case study in the Apennines, NW Italy. Hydrobiology. 568(1):67–78.
  • Boulton AJ, Datry T, Kasahara T, Mutz M, Stanford JA. 2010. Ecology and management of the hyporheic zone: stream-groundwater interactions of running waters and their floodplains. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 29(1):26–40.
  • Boulton AJ, Dole-Olivier MJ, Marmonier P. 2004. Effects of sample volume and taxonomic resolution on assessment of hyporheic assemblage composition sampled using a Bou-Rouch pump. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. 159:327–355.
  • Boulton AJ, Marmonier P. 2007. Hyporheic invertebrate community composition in streams of varying salinity in southwestern Australia. River Resource and Application. 594:579–594.
  • Brasil. 1987. Projeto Radambrasil. Levantamento de recursos naturais. Vol. 32. Brasilia, BR: Ministerio das Minas e Energia.
  • Brunke M, Gonser T. 1997. The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biology. 37(1):1–33.
  • Buffagni A, Erba S, Armanini DG. 2010. The lentic-lotic character of Mediterranean rivers and its importance to aquatic invertebrate communities. Aquatic Science. 72:45–60.
  • Claret C, Marmonier P, Dole-Olivier M-J, Creuzé des Châtelliers M, Boulton AJ, Castella E. 1999. A functional classification of interstitial invertebrates: supplementing measures of biodiversity using species traits and habitat affinities. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. 145:385–403.
  • Coffman WP, Ferrington LC Jr. 1996. Chironomidae. In: Merritt RW, Cummins KW, editors. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 3rd ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt; p. 635–754.
  • Colwell RK. 2013. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User’s Guide and application. Published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
  • Culver D, Pipan T. 2009. The biology of caves and other subterranean habitats. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 256 p.
  • Dahm CN, Valett HM. 1996. Hyporheic zones. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA, editors. Methods in stream ecology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; p. 107–119.
  • Dent CL, Schade JD, Grimm NB, Fisher SG. 2000. Subsurface influences on surface biology. In: Jones JB, Mulholland PJ, editors. Streams and ground waters. San Diego, CA: Academic San Diego Press; p. 381–404.
  • DeWalt RE, Stewart KW. 1995. Life histories of stoneflies (Plecoptera) in the Rio Conejos of Southern Colorado. The Great Basin Naturalist, 55(1):1–18.
  • Dole-Oliver MJ, Marmonier P, Beffy JL. 1997. Response of invertebrate to lotic disturbance: is the hyporheic zone a patchy refugium? Freshwater Biology. 37:257–276.
  • Epler JH. 2001. Identification manual for the larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina. A guide to the taxonomy of the midges of the southeastern United States, including Florida. Special Publication SJ2001-SP13. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC, and St. Johns River Water Management District, Palatka, FL; 526 p.
  • Ferrington LC. 2008. Global diversity of non-biting midges (Chironomidae; Insecta-Diptera) in freshwater. Hydrobiology. 595(1):447–455.
  • Ford JB. 1962. The vertical distribution of larval Chironomidae (Dipt.) in the mud of a stream. Hydrobiology. 19(3):262–262.
  • Franken JM, Storey RG, Williams DD. 2001. Biological, chemical and physical characteristics of downwelling and upwelling zones in the hyporheic zone of a north-temperate stream. Hydrobiology. 444:183–195.
  • Gibert J, Danielopol D, Stanford JA. 1994. Groundwater ecology. 1st ed. London: Academic Press; p. XVII + 571.
  • Gibert J, Dole-Olivier MJ, Marmonier P, Vervier P. 1990. Surface waterground ecotones. In: Naiman RJ, Decamps H, editors. The ecology and management of aquatic-terrestrial ecotones. London: CRC Press.
  • Godbout L, Hynes HBN. 1982. The three dimensional distribution of the fauna in a single riffle in a stream in Ontario. Hydrobiology. 97:87–96.
  • Hahn HJ. 2006. The GW-Fauna-Index: a first approach to a quantitative ecological assessment of groundwater habitats. Limnologica. 36(2):119–137.
  • Hancock PJ. 2002. Human impacts on the stream-groundwater exchange zone. Environmental Management. 29(6):763–781.
  • Harvey JW, Wagner BJ. 2000. Quantifying hydrologic interactions between streams and their subsurface hyporheic zones. In: Jones JB, Mulholland PJ, editors. Streams and ground waters. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; p. 3–44.
  • Henriques-Oliveira AL, Nessimian JL, Dorvillé LF. 2003. Feeding habits of chironomid larvae (Insecta: Diptera) from a stream in the Floresta da Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 63(2):269–281.
  • Hurlbert SH. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecology monograph. 54(2):187–211.
  • Hutchinson PA, Webster I.T. 1998. Solute uptake in aquatic sediments due to current-obstacle interactions. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 124:419–426.
  • Jacobsen D, Schultz R, Encalada A. 1997. Structure and diversity of stream invertebrate assemblages: the effect of temperature with altitude and latitude. Freshwater Biology. 38:247–261.
  • James AB, Suren AM. 2009. The response of invertebrates to a gradient of flow reduction–an instream channel study in a New Zealand lowland river. Freshwater Biology. 54(11):2225–2242.
  • Käser D. 2010. A new habitat of subsurface waters: the hyporheic biotope, by Traian Orghidan (1959). Fundamental and applied Limnology. 176(4):291–302.
  • Kleine P, Trivinho-Strixino S. 2005. Chironomidae and other macroinvertebrates of a first order stream: community response after habitat fragmentation. Acta Limnologica Brasiliense. 17(1):81–90.
  • Lee DR, Cherry JA. 1978. A field exercise on groundwater flow using seepage meters and mini-piezometers. Journal of Geological Education. 27:6–10.
  • Lencioni V. 2004. Survival strategies of freshwater insects in cold environments. Journal of Limnology. 63:45–55.
  • Lencioni VL, Marziali L, Rossaro B. 2008. Hyporheic chironomids in alpine streams. Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal. 13:127–132.
  • Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. African Journal of Aquatic Science. 29(2):285–286.
  • Malard F, Dole-Olivier MJ, Mathieu J, Stoch F. 2002. PASCALIS D4 Deliverable for Workpackage 4: sampling manual for the assessment of regional groundwater biodiversity. European Project Protocols for the Assessment and Conservation of Aquatic Life in the Subsurface (PASCALIS; No EVK-CT-2001-00121).
  • Marchant R. 1988. Vertical distribution of benthic invertebrates in the Bed of the Thomson River, Victoria. Marine and Freshwater Research. 39(6):775–784.
  • Martins MF. 2011. Historical biogeography of the Brazilian Atlantic forest and the Carnaval–Moritz model of Pleistocene refugia: what do phylogeographical studies tell us? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 104:499–509.
  • McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution (Amsterdam). 21(4):178–185.
  • McKie BG, Pearson RG, Cranston PS. 2005. Does biogeographical history matter? Diversity and distribuition of lotic midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) in the Australian Wet Tropics. Austral Ecology. 30:1–13.
  • Morris DL, Brooker MP. 1979. The vertical distribution of macro-invertebrates in the substratum of the upper reaches of the River Wye, Wales. Freshwater Biology. 9(6):573–583.
  • Mugnai R, Messana G, Di Lorenzo T. 2015a. The hyporheic zone and its functions: revision and research status in Neotropical regions. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 75(3):524–534.
  • Mugnai R, Messana G, Di Lorenzo T. 2015b. Hyporheic invertebrate assemblages at reach scale in a Neotropical stream in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 75(4):773–782.
  • Mugnai R, Sattamini A, dos Santos JAA. 2015c. A survey of Escherichia coli and Salmonella in the Hyporheic Zone of a subtropical stream: their bacteriological, physicochemical and environmental relationships. PloS One. 10(6):e0129382.
  • Mugnai R, Serpa-Filho AR. 2015. A new proposal for the optimization of morphological analyses of micro and macroinvertebrates in ecological freshwater studies. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Science. 10(1):76–79.
  • Nessimian JL, Amorim RM, Henriques-Oliveira AL. 2003. Chironomidae (Diptera) do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Levantamento dos gêneros e habitats de ocorrência. Publicações Avulsas do Museu Nacional. 98:1–16.
  • Olsen DA, Townsend CR. 2003. Hyporheic community composition in a gravel-bed stream: influence of vertical hydrological exchange, sediment structure and physicochemistry. Freshwater Biology. 48:1363–1378.
  • Olsen DA, Townsend CR, Matthaei CD. 2001. Influence of reach geomorphology on hyporheic communities in a gravel-bed stream. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 35:181–190.
  • Omesová M, Helešic J. 2007. Vertical distribution of invertebrates in bed sediments of a gravel stream in the Czech Republic. International Review of Hydrobiology. 92(4–5):480–490.
  • Omesová M, Horsák M, Helešic J. 2008. Nested patterns in hyporheic meta-communities: the role of body morphology and penetrability of sediment. Naturwissenschaften. 95(10):917–926.
  • Orghidan T. 1959. Ein neuer Lebensraum des unterirdischen Wasser: der hyporheische Biotop. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. 55:392–414.
  • Petchey OL, Gaston KJ. 2006. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecology Letters. 9(6):741–758.
  • Pinder LCV. 1986. Biology of freshwater Chironomidae. Annual Review of Entomology. 31:1–23.
  • Pinder LCV. 1995. The habitats of Chironomid larvae. In: Armitage PD, Cranston PS, Pinder LCV, editors. The Chironomidae. The biology and ecology of non-biting midges. London: Chapman and Hall; p. 107–135.
  • Poff NL, Olden JD, Vieira NKM, Finn DS, Simmons MP, Kondratieff BC. 2006. Functional trait niches of North American lotic insects: trait-based ecological applications in light of phylogenetic relationships. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 25:730–755.
  • Principe RE, Boccolini MF, Corigliano MC. 2008. Structure and spatial-temporal dynamics of Chironomidae fauna (Diptera) in upland and lowland fluvial habitats of the Chocancharava River Basin (Argentina). Hydrobiologia. 93(3):342–357.
  • Pugsley CW, Hynes HBN. 1983. A modified freeze-core technique to quantify the depth distribution of fauna in stony streambeds. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 40(5):637–643.
  • Puntí T, Rieradevall M, Prat N. 2009. Environmental factors, spatial variation, and specific requirements of Chironomidae in Mediterranean reference streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 28(1):247–265.
  • R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.
  • Reynolds SK, Benke AC. 2006. Chironomid emergence and relative emergent biomass from two Alabama streams. Southeastern Naturalist. 5(1):165–174.
  • Reynolds SK, Benke AC. 2012. Chironomid production along a hyporheic gradient in contrasting stream types. Freshwater Science. 31(1):167–181.
  • Roque FO, Trivinho-Strixino S, Strixino G. 2003. Benthic macroinvertebrates in streams of the Jaraguá State Park (Southeast of Brazil) considering multiple spatial scales. Journal of Insect Conservation. 7(2):63–72.
  • Rosa BFJV, de Oliveira VC, Alves RDG. 2011. Structure and spatial distribution of the Chironomidae community in mesohabitats in a first order stream at the Poço D’Anta Municipal Biological Reserve in Brazil. Journal of Insect Science. 11(1):36.
  • Rossaro B. 1991. Factors that determine Chironomidae species distribution in fresh waters. Italian Journal of Zoology. 58:281–286.
  • Sabater F, Vila PB. 1992. The hyporheic zone considered as an ecotone. Homage to Ramon Margalef, or, Why there is such pleasure in studying nature. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona; p. 35–43.
  • Saito VS, Fonseca-Gessner AA. 2014. Taxonomic composition and feeding habits of Chironomidae in Cerrado streams (Southeast Brazil): impacts of land use changes. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 26(1):35–46.
  • Sanseverino AM, Nessimian JL. 2008. Larvas de Chironomidae (Diptera) em depósitos de folhiço submerso em um riacho de primeira ordem da Mata Atlântica (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia. 52(1):95–104.
  • Serra SRQ, Cobo F, Grac MAS¸ Dolédec S, Feio MJ. 2016. Synthesising the trait information of European Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera): towards a new database. Ecological Indicators. 61:282–292.
  • Sherfy MH, Kirkpatrick RL, Richkus KD. 2000. Benthos core sampling and chironomid vertical distribution: implications for assessing shorebird food availability. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 28(1):124–130.
  • Siqueira T, Roquec FO, Trivinho-Strixino S. 2008. Species richness, abundance, and body size relationships from a neotropical chironomid assemblage: looking for patterns. Basic and Applied Ecology. 9(5):606–612.
  • Smith JWN. 2005. The hyporheic zone, definitions and conceptual models of the hyporheic zone. In: Groundwater-surface water interactions in the hyporheic zone. Bristol: Environment Agency; p. 9–13.
  • Sonoda KC, Matthaei CD, Trivinho-Strixino S. 2009. Contrasting land uses affect Chironomidae communities in two Brazilian rivers. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. 174(2):173–184.
  • Stark BP, Baumann RW, Kondratieff BC, Stewart KW. 2013. Larval and egg morphology of Paraperla frontalis (Banks 1902) and P. wilsoni Ricker 1965 (Plecoptera: Chloroperlidae). Illiesia. 9(08):101–108.
  • Strahler AN. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions American Geophysical Union. 38:913–920.
  • Stubbington R. 2012. The hyporheic zone as an invertebrate refuge: a review of variability in space, time, taxa and behaviour. Marine and Freshwater Research. 63(4):293–311.
  • Tachet H, Richoux P, Bournaud M, Usseglio-Polatera P. 2010. Invertébrés d’eau douce, Nouvelle edition. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Press.
  • Thibodeaux LJ, Boyle JD. 1987. Bedform-generated convective transport in bottom sediment. Nature. 325:341–343.
  • Trivinho-Strixino S. 2011. Guia de identificação e diagnose dos gêneros de Chironomidae (Diptera). São Carlos, SP: EdUFSCar Editora; 371 p.
  • Valett HM. 1993. Surface-hyporheic interactions in a Sonoran Desert stream: hydrologic exchange and diel periodicity. Hydrobiologia. 259:133–144.
  • Vigna Taglianti A, Cottarelli V, Argano R. 1969. Messa a punto di metodiche per la raccolta della fauna interstiziale e freatica. Archivio Botanico e Biogeografico Italiano. 45(14):375–380.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.