Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer

ABSTRACT

Background

Chronic pain, sensory disturbances, and lymphedema are frequent after breast cancer, leading to arm dysfunction. There is a need for objective performance-based clinical exercise tests for the upper extremity in patients with breast cancer.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in breast cancer survivors.

Methods

Forty-eight women with breast cancer (mean age = 55.40 ± 10.40 years) were included. All patients performed 6PBRT on the first day and one week later to investigate the test-retest reliability of the 6PBRT, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. The peak workload (W_peak) and oxygen consumption level (VO_2peak) during the arm ergometer test were used as outcomes for the criterion validity of the 6PBRT.

Results

The 6PBRT showed good test – retest reliability with an ICC_1,2 value of 0.871 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.769–0.928]. The first 6PBRT score was very strongly correlated with the second test score (r = 0.866, p < .001). The 6PBRT score was significantly correlated with VO_2peak (r = 0.634, p < .001), and W_peak (r = 0.546, p < .001). While the 6PBRT score had less effect on VO_2peak, the determination of VO_2peak in the model was very good (R² = 0.832).

Conclusion

The 6PBRT has good test-retest reliability and is a valid test in individuals with breast cancer. These findings suggest that 6PBRT is a practical, useful, valid and reliable assessment tool for determining functional arm exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.

KEYWORDS:

• Arm ergometry test
• breast cancer
• exercise tolerance test
• upper extremity

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [HO], upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.