Beyond populist politics: why conventional politics needs to conjure myths of its own and why it struggles to do so

ABSTRACT

The last ten years has seen the rise of populist forces across the globe from both the right and the left. While often read in the context of the perceived rise of, and reactions to populist and potentially violent Islam, this analysis is excessively focused on observations of the right, and ignores similarities between the populist right and the populist left. By way of an alternative, this article draws together political theology, original ethnography and observations of contemporary politics in the United Kingdom (and to a lesser extent the United States and Canada) to offer a broader lens involving: the rise of liberalism, the consequent construction of politics as technocratic management, and the neglect and resultant disillusionment of ordinary people. In particular, the paper draws on my recent research on the role of myths of solidarity in developing civic engagement. It argues that myths of solidarity have been undermined by the rise of liberalism, and that restoring such myths to the center of contemporary politics is vital to challenging the myths of division that fuel populist politics. Finally, it explores possibilities for restoring myths to the center of contemporary politics, suggesting that while avenues for such reform are emerging, politics as technocratic management remains the dominant paradigm.

KEYWORDS:

• Populist politics
• myth
• solidarity
• technocratic
• community organizing

View responses to this article:

Between radical orthodoxy and the turn to the empirical: a reply to Stacey

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Understanding Unbelief [17].