1,665
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Optimal thyrotropin level for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma after ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Article: 2160880 | Received 26 Sep 2022, Accepted 15 Dec 2022, Published online: 04 Jan 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

Maintaining an optimal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level is important in the postoperative management of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). However, there is little evidence for TSH target levels in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA). This study aimed to determine the optimal TSH level for management in low-risk patients who underwent RFA.

Methods

This retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study included patients with low-risk PTC who underwent RFA from January 2014 to December 2018. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the range of TSH levels: low (≤2 mU/L) and high (>2 mU/L) TSH levels. Local tumor progression and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the low TSH and high TSH groups, using propensity score analyses based on patient- and tumor-level characteristics. Univariate analyses were performed to select risk factors for tumor progression.

Results

Overall, our study included 516 patients with low-risk PTC who underwent RFA with a long-term follow-up of 5-years. During follow-up, the overall incidence rate of local tumor progression was 4.8% (25/516), with no significant difference between the matched groups (7/106 [6.6%] vs. 5/53 [9.4%], p = 0.524). DFS did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.5). Moreover, TSH level was not regarded as a significant predictor of tumor progression after Cox analysis; primary tumor size was the only relevant risk factor.

Conclusion

This large propensity-matched study revealed no association between TSH levels and tumor progression. Thus, for patients with low-risk PTC who underwent RFA, the optimalTSH level is recommended at the euthyroid range.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).