Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 28, 2016 - Issue 8
513
Views
46
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Differential expression of pro-inflammatory and oxidative stress mediators induced by nitrogen dioxide and ozone in primary human bronchial epithelial cells

, &
Pages 374-382 | Received 10 Mar 2016, Accepted 28 Apr 2016, Published online: 20 May 2016
 

Abstract

Context: NO2 and O3 are ubiquitous air toxicants capable of inducing lung damage to the respiratory epithelium. Due to their oxidizing capabilities, these pollutants have been proposed to target specific biological pathways, but few publications have compared the pathways activated.

Objective: This work will test the premise that NO2 and O3 induce toxicity by activating similar cellular pathways.

Methods: Primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs, n = 3 donors) were exposed for 2 h at an air-liquid interface to 3 ppm NO2, 0.75 ppm O3, or filtered air and harvested 1 h post-exposure. To give an overview of pathways that may be influenced by each exposure, gene expression was measured using PCR arrays for toxicity and oxidative stress. Based on the results, genes were selected to quantify whether expression changes were changed in a dose- and time-response manner using NO2 (1, 2, 3, or 5 ppm), O3 (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, or 1.00 ppm), or filtered air and harvesting 0, 1, 4 and 24 h post-exposure.

Results: Using the arrays, genes related to oxidative stress were highly induced with NO2 while expression of pro-inflammatory and vascular function genes was found subsequent to O3. NO2 elicited the greatest HMOX1 response, whereas O3 more greatly induced IL-6, IL-8 and PTGS2 expression. Additionally, O3 elicited a greater response 1 h post-exposure and NO2 produced a maximal response after 4 h.

Conclusion: We have demonstrated that these two oxidant gases stimulate differing mechanistic responses in vitro and these responses occur at dissimilar times.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Shaun D. McCullough and Mr. David S. Morgan for technical assistance; TRC Environmental Corporation for engineering support; Dr. Andy Ghio, Dr. Martha Sue Carraway, Maryann Bassett, R.N., Tracey Montilla, R.N. and Julie Wood, R.N for clinical support.

Declaration of interest

This work was supported by United States Environmental Protection Agency intramural funding, the EPA Cooperative Agreement with the Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma, and Lung Biology at the University of North Carolina [CR83346301], and a National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences T32 grant [T32ES007126]. The research described in this article has been reviewed by the National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Agency, nor does the mention of trade names of commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. The authors report no declaration of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.