42
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Geomorphic features of Lake Havasu with impacts on its water resource capacity

 

Abstract

Wilson DC. 2024. Geomorphic features of Lake Havasu with impacts on its water resource capacity. Lake Reserv Manage. 40:93–108.

Determining a reservoir’s available storage capacity and its possible rate of change over time through in-filling are 2 of many parameters needed to conduct efficient and flexible water delivery operations, particularly in cascading river-reservoir systems. This study focused on this issue through generating the first bathymetric elevation map of Lake Havasu on the Colorado River (CR) with enough detail to identify geomorphic features, including areas of deposition, to assess the current storage capacity of the reservoir. Two main areas of deposition were identified, the CR inlet delta and the Bill Williams River (BWR) delta at the reservoir’s northern and southern ends, respectively. The physical distribution of the CR inlet deposits well into the main reservoir and to some extent those of the BWR delta also may have been influenced by one episode of drastic water level lowering early in the reservoir’s history that probably re-mobilized sediments when fluvial dynamics temporarily resumed. High resolution sonar images compared with the CR channel position on a pre-reservoir topographic map, a sonar-generated reservoir bottom hardness map coupled with grain-size analyses of sediment samples, and modeling reservoir water level changes support this notion. Post-reservoir dam construction up both rivers has cut off sediment sources that historically reached Lake Havasu, effectively reducing sedimentation rates. Determined thicknesses of the sediment packages indicate that Lake Havasu has lost more than 7% of its available storage capacity since inception, which is an important parameter for adjusting management of water deliveries and storage in the Colorado River system.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power for permission to use the 1931 topographic map. Also thank you to the reviewers of this article for their thoughtful comments. The authors thank members of the Clean Colorado River Sustainability Coalition for funding this project

Disclosure statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.