188
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The helping relationship in the foster care context: perspectives from parent-caseworker dyads

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3-30 | Received 10 Jun 2021, Accepted 19 Mar 2023, Published online: 05 Apr 2023
 

ABSTRACT

While the helping relationship is often viewed as a core element of child welfare practice, there is limited research on how birth parents and caseworkers describe the helping relationship in the foster care context. We interviewed six parent-worker dyads individually (N = 12) to explore how parents and caseworkers describe their helping relationship and perspectives on the role of the helping relationship on parents’ participation in foster care case activities. We used thematic analysis to analyze data within and between dyads. We developed two main themes: (a) foundations of the helping relationship and (b) case participation influences. Parents and caseworkers endorsed similar skills, characteristics, and behaviors from caseworkers that supported a good helping relationship: honesty and openness, nonjudgmental attitude, respect, and communication. Parents and caseworkers had different views on the role of the helping relationship in parents’ case participation. Parents emphasized their children as motivation for engaging in case activities; yet they indicated the helping relationship can support or hinder their participation in services. Caseworkers elevated the role of the helping relationship in participation more than did parents. Parents and caseworkers also identified parents’ context and agency/system factors as influencing parent participation.

Acknowledgments

This manuscript was part of Kansas Assessment Permanency Project, which was funded by the U.S. Children’s Bureau, Administration for Children, Youth and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, under grant number 90-CO-1120. The article’s contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Children’s Bureau.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by the U.S. Children’s Bureau [90-CO-1120].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.