ABSTRACT
Background
In-stent restenosis hardly limits the therapeutic effect of the percutaneous vascular intervention. Although the restenosis is significantly ameliorated after the application of new drug-eluting stents, the incidence of restenosis remains at a high level.
Objective
Vascular adventitial fibroblasts (AFs) play an important role in intimal hyperplasia and subsequent restenosis. The current study was aimed to investigate the role of nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 1 (NR1D1) in the vascular intimal hyperplasia.
Methods and Results
We observed increased expression of NR1D1 after the transduction of adenovirus carrying Nr1d1 gene (Ad-Nr1d1) in AFs. Ad-Nr1d1 transduction significantly reduced the numbers of total AFs, Ki-67-positive AFs, and the migration rate of AFs. NR1D1 overexpression decreased the expression level of β-catenin and attenuated the phosphorylation of the effectors of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), including mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1). Restoration of β-catenin by SKL2001 abolished the inhibitory effects of NR1D1 overexpression on the proliferation and migration of AFs. Surprisingly, the restoration of mTORC1 activity by insulin could also reverse the decreased expression of β-catenin, attenuated proliferation, and migration in AFs induced by NR1D1 overexpression. In vivo, we found that SR9009 (an agonist of NR1D1) ameliorated the intimal hyperplasia at days 28 after injury of carotid artery. We further observed that SR9009 attenuated the increased Ki-67-positive AFs, an essential part of vascular restenosis at days 7 after injury to the carotid artery.
Conclusion
These data suggest that NR1D1 inhibits intimal hyperplasia by suppressing the proliferation and migration of AFs in a mTORC1/β-catenin-dependent manner.
Author contributions
K.P. and M.L.W. contributed equally to the work. K.P. and M.L.W. conceived the project. D.C.Y. and X.S.S. designed the study. K.P., M.L.W., D.C.Y., X.S.S., and Y.J.Y. supervised the entire research. K.P. and M.L.W. performed most of the experimental work and conducted data analysis. J.W., Q.W., and D.L. provided some technical support. K.P. contributed to the figure preparation. D.C.Y. X.S.S., and Y.J.Y. discussed the study. D.C.Y. and X.S.S. organized the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Supplementary material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2023.2178659