ABSTRACT
Background
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that Songling Xuemaikang capsule (SXC) is effective in blood pressure (BP) lowering for essential hypertension. However, the effectiveness of SXC in real-world clinical practice remains unknown. We aimed to investigate whether the BP-lowering effectiveness of SXC in the real-world practice setting is comparable to the efficacy of the intervention in a randomized controlled trial.
Methods
We included 1325 patients treated with SXC monotherapy from a real-world registry and 300 from the SXC-BP trial. A propensity score matching (PSM) approach was used to select participants from the two cohorts. The primary outcome was a change in the office of BP from baseline to 8 weeks.
Results
After PSM, there were 552 patients for the comparative analysis. Clinically meaningful BP reductions were observed both in the real world and in the RCT cohorts after 8-week SXC treatment. The 8-week systolic/diastolic BP was 129.50/81.33 mm Hg vs. 134.97/84.14 mm Hg in the real-world population and the RCT population, respectively. The changes in systolic BP (15.82 ± 10.71 vs. 10.48 ± 10.24; P < .001), and diastolic BP (10.01 ± 7.73 vs. 7.75 ± 8.14; P = .001) from baseline to 8 weeks were significantly greater in the real-world population.
Conclusion
The current comparison demonstrated that SXC monotherapy is at least as effective in real-world settings as within the randomized controlled trial for BP lowering in patients with grade 1 hypertension.
Acknowledgments
We thank all patients and their families for participating in the registry or the SXC-BP trial and all the centers and investigators who devoted their effort and time to the two studies.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Abbreviations
BMI | = | body mass index |
BP | = | blood pressure |
PSM | = | propensity score matching |
RCT | = | randomized controlled trial |
SXC | = | Songling Xuemaikang capsule. |