Coloniality in Discourse Studies: A Radical Critique

"Coloniality in Discourse Studies: A Radical Critique." Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, 29(3), pp. 274–277

Notes

1. Humberto R. Maturana, “Reality: The Search for Objectivity or the Quest for a Compelling Argument,” The Irish Journal of Psychology 9, no. 1 (1988): 25–82.

2. Theresa Catalano and Linda R. Waugh, Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond (Cham: Springer, 2020).

3. Teun van Dijk, “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity,” in Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 95–120 (SAGE Publications, 2001).

4. Sol Rojas-Lizana, The Discourse of Perceived Discrimination: Perspectives from Contemporary Australian Society (New York: Routledge, 2019).

5. Aníbal Quijano, “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America,” Nepantla: Views from South 1, no. 3 (2000): 533–580; Walter D. Mignolo, The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options (Durham: Duke Univ. Press, 2011).

6. Aníbal Quijano, “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality,” Cultural Studies 21, no. 2–3 (2007): 168–178.

7. Nelson Maldonado-Torres, “Fanon and Decolonial Thought,” in Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, ed. Michael A. Peters, 799–803 (Singapore: Springer, 2017).

8. Viviane Resende, “Decolonizing Critical Discourse Studies: For a Latin American Perspective,” Critical Discourse Studies 18, no. 1 (2021): 26–42.

9. van Dijk, “Multidisciplinary CDA”; Rojas-Lizana, Discourse of Perceived Discrimination.