Unknotting typologies in smallholder farmers investing in seed potato production in South-Western Uganda

ABSTRACT

Smallholder farmer participation in seed production ensures seed security among farming communities. Interventions that promote farmer investment in seed production, however, enroll any willing farmer, yet smallholder farmers can be heterogeneously composed of receptive and new intervention-shy individuals. This study sought to identify homogenous typologies of seed potato producers investing in seed potato production in South-Western Uganda. Data collected from 213 farmers and 16 focus group discussions were analyzed using principal component and cluster analysis methods to construct farming typologies. Psychological capital and investment level were major variables in typology distilation. The results revealed 4 seed potato producer typologies including, typology 1 of ‘middle-aged female seed multipliers of moderate psychological capital and low investment level', typology 2 of ‘old-aged seed recyclers of high psychological capital but with the lowest investment level', typology 3 of for ‘young male seed recyclers of moderate psychological capital but with high investment level' and typology 4 of ‘young male seed multipliers of high psychological capital and the highest investment level’. Investing in seed potato production across the typologies was constrained by identical factors, including land shortage, limited access to markets, credit facilities and seed storage facilities. Seed interventionists are recommended to focus on typology 4, 3 and 1 producers. Future typology studies should include psychological factors to introduce practical variability nested in individual interpretations of seemly constant contexts.

KEYWORDS:

• Cognitive
• psychological capital
• seed potato production
• investment
• smallholder farmers
• typology
• Uganda

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the contribution of seed potato farmers of Kanungu and Kabale, the key informants from KaZARDI, UNSPPA, IFDC, IITA and the District Local Governments of Kabale and Kanungu who offered the information used in this study and the research assistants who participated in the data collection activities are greatly appreciated. IITA Kampala office through the PASIC project is also acknowledged for offering office space for writing.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 The study was conducted in the former Kabale district before it was divided into two other districts of Rubanda and Rukiga districts.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Regional Universities Forum for Capacity Building in Africa (RUFORUM) with funding from the Carnegie Corporation of New York; Grant number: RU/2016/Carneige/DRG/011 DAAD under Grant number 57299300 and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture through the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Kampala under (Act 23620 PASIC) to the Policy Action for Sustainable Intensification of Ugandan Cropping Systems (PASIC) Project. and by CGIAR Research Programme on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB).