9,018
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Eady edge waves, frontal wave-trains and type-B cyclogenesis

Pages 1-11 | Received 07 Dec 2020, Accepted 23 Feb 2021, Published online: 15 Mar 2021
 

Abstract

Eady edge waves (EEWs) propagate on surface baroclinic zones and they resemble synoptic and sub-synoptic scale frontal wave-trains. The wave-trains are frequently depicted on surface charts, and occur per se on a front with a local baroclinicity extremum. The possible linkage of EEWs to frontal waves is explored within the framework of so-called ‘surface quasi-geostrophic dynamics’ by establishing the properties of free and forced EEWs propagating on an ambient flow comprising a laterally confined baroclinic zone. It is shown that the dispersion properties of the free EEWs modes are influenced significantly both by the zone’s baroclinicity extremum and by key features that are akin to those of cold and warm fronts. In particular the larger-scale waves are nondispersive and a local wave-packet can retain coherency, the leading modes on a pseudo-cold front possess a phase speed related to the baroclinicity extremum, whereas waves on a pseudo-warm front propagate in the reverse direction. Also theoretical considerations demonstrate that forced modes can undergo resonant secular growth. It is further shown that transient or sustained forcing of a front by an upper-tropospheric potential vorticity anomaly (sic. short-wave trough) can serve to instigate features akin to frontal wave-trains and type-B cyclogenesis. More generally the study hints at the significance for NWP of a front’s structure and its dispersion properties, and that an element of predictability is introduced by the latter features due to dynamical scale selection.

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to Michael T. Montgomery for his constructive and insightful review. Data for was accessed from the Wetterzentrale (www.wetterzentrale.de) web-site. Panel (a) is the operational SLP chart of the German weather service (DWD), whilst the remaining panels are from the NCEP (CFS Reanalysis @ 0.5°) dataset.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.