150
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Think Piece

Improving social recovery capital research to enhance clinical utility: a proposed agenda

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 153-159 | Received 11 Jan 2023, Accepted 09 Jun 2023, Published online: 20 Jun 2023
 

Abstract

Social recovery capital (SRC) is the combination of social resources that can be used to initiate and sustain addiction recovery through friends, family, and peers. Broadly, understanding one’s SRC allows us to get a sense of where one has social support for recovery and where there may be social barriers to their recovery process. SRC is often a vital component of many people’s recovery journey, yet our understanding of how best to use this concept in research and practice remains underdeveloped. To improve understanding of the role of social recovery capital and strategies to measure and increase it, we present a roadmap involving a five-pronged research agenda to: (1) Refine the measurement of social recovery capital; (2) Model the complexity of social recovery capital empirically; (3) Integrate personality science with social recovery capital research; (4) Optimize evidence-based behavior change techniques of social recovery capital; and (5) Incorporate an intersectional framework when examining or applying social recovery capital. Overall, this five-pronged research agenda seeks to enhance the clinical utility of SRC research to maximize the impact of SRC on one’s recovery.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Personality science is equally relevant to SRC research for individuals who are not in formal treatment. Personality science will facilitate understanding how individual differences in personality facilitate or undermine building SRC outside of formal treatment.

2 Although full review of behavior change techniques is beyond the scope of this manuscript, readers should examine the behavior change taxonomy for additional considerations on measuring and analyzing intervention components (Michie et al. Citation2013).

Additional information

Funding

Author support was provided by NIAAA to Samuel N. Meisel [K99AA030030], Emily A. Hennessy [K01AA028536], and John F. Kelly [K24AA022136].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.