224
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue on TNCs, Geopolitical Risks, and Russia-Ukraine Crisis

How political risk in host country affects FDI: an explanation for the paradox of China’s investment risk preference

, &
Pages 353-370 | Received 12 May 2022, Accepted 06 Nov 2022, Published online: 09 Dec 2022
 

Abstract

In recent years, the scale of China’s outward foreign direct investment has been expanding, and the political risks are also intensifying. How does political risk affect the decision-making of outward foreign direct investment? This paper collected the relevant data of 134 countries from 2003 to 2016, using the regression method of System Generalised Method of Moments. It studies the political risk preference of outward foreign direct investment in the world and China. The study found that there is no political risk preference in the world as a whole. In contrast, China’s outward foreign direct investment has obvious political risk preference. China does not have a political risk preference for developed countries. At the same time, China has shown strong default risk preference for emerging market countries and countries along the "the Belt and Road". This study adds default risk when measuring political risk, and further subdivides political risk into five categories, taking into account their internal interaction mechanism. In addition, this paper not only studies the similarities and differences of outward foreign direct investment 's political risk preferences between China and the world, but also introduces investment motivation to better explain the location choice of China’s outward foreign direct investment.

Acknowledgement

We thank anonymous referees and the editors of this journal for their very insightful and constructive comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 This article selects the emerging market countries, including Brazil, Chile, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Burma, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Bangladesh.

2 The “the Belt and Road” countries selected in this paper include: Albania, United Arab Emirates, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, Bahrain, Belarus, Brunei, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Egypt, Estonia, Greece, Croatia, Hungary, Indonesia, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Sri Lanka, Lithuania Moldova, Myanmar, Malaysia, Pakistan, Oman, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Syria, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, Thailand, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, Vietnam and Yemen.

Additional information

Funding

This research is supported by the Major Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research in Colleges and Universities of Hubei Province [21ZD013]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2722022BY013]; Postgraduate research and innovation project of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law [202311054].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.