https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-9098
![Sample our Politics & International Relations journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5947/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Politics-International-Relations.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
The concept of strategic stability has come under immense pressure in recent years. It is not only conceptually fuzzy but nuclear multipolarity, novel technologies, an exacerbating crisis in arms control, and a growing acceptance of “softer” norms are all taking a toll. At the same time, nuclear weapon states are concerned with possible instability to a degree not seen since the most severe crises of the Cold War. This special issue seeks to clarify some of the profound challenges to strategic stability while also offering novel scholarly as well as policy-relevant approaches to better understanding and mitigating the risks of instability. The three articles and one commentary focus on the US-Russian dyad and pragmatic efforts to clarify the goals and means of strategic stability between Moscow and Washington; the impact of emerging technologies in Russia’s war against Ukraine; US and Russian leaders’ perceptions of artificial intelligence as a novel and threatening capability of competition; and possible US efforts to initiate an arms control dialogue with China by early discussions on crisis management.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1 In a multi-perspective project, led by the Körber Foundation, participants from China, Europe, Russia, and the United States agreed in 2021 that “A shared understanding of strategic stability among great powers would be helpful, but as long as they can agree on shared concerns and as long as discussions on strategic stability result in concrete measures that would reduce the risk of military escalation and help disincentivize strategic first strikes, a mutually agreed definition is not mandatory” (Körber Foundation Citation2021, 1).