78
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Validation of Obstetric Diagnosis and Procedure Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry in 2017

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 121-130 | Received 13 Oct 2023, Accepted 06 Jan 2024, Published online: 20 Feb 2024
 

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the validity of variables related to pregnancy, delivery, and key characteristics of the infant in the Danish National Patient Register using maternal medical records as the reference standard.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed medical records of 1264 women giving birth in the Region of Southern Denmark during 2017. We calculated positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity to estimate the validity of 49 selected variables.

Results

The PPV was ≥0.90 on most pregnancy-related variables including parity, pre-gestational BMI, diabetes disorders, and previous cesarean section, while it was lower for hypertensive disorders, especially mild to moderate preeclampsia (0.49, 95% CI 0.32–0.66). Sensitivity ranged from 0.80 to 1.00 on all pregnancy-related variables, except hypertensive disorders (sensitivity 0.38–0.71, lowest for severe preeclampsia). On most delivery-related variables including obstetric surgical procedures (eg cesarean section and induction of labor), pharmacological pain-relief, and gestational age at delivery, PPV’s ranged from 0.98 to 1.00 and the corresponding sensitivities from 0.87 to 1.00. Regarding infant-related variables, both the APGAR score registered five minutes after delivery and birthweight yielded a PPV of 1.00.

Conclusion

Obstetric coding in the Danish National Patient Register shows very high validity and completeness making it a valuable source for epidemiologic research.

Plain Language Summary

Danish register data are often used for epidemiological research in reproduction. The registers are based on coded information to the registers based on information from medical records. The quality of the register data is highly dependent of the validity of the codes. Yet there is a lack in our knowledge of the validity of data related to pregnancy, childbirth, and the characteristics of the newborn baby. We therefore aimed to validate the Danish National Patient Registry data related to pregnancy and childbirth by comparing the registered code with information from the medical records.

We scrutinized medical records from 1264 women giving birth in the Region of Southern Denmark during 2017. We compared the registration in the medical record with the registered code in the Danish National Patient Registry by calculating how accurate the register data are according to 49 different variables.

Results showed that registered codes in the Patient Registry for pregnancy- and childbirth-related conditions and key infant characteristics were to a high degree in agreement with the data from the medical report with few exceptions.

In conclusion, the study revealed that the Danish National Patient Register provides highly accurate and comprehensive data for most pregnancy, delivery, and infant-related variables. This underscores the register's value as a reliable source for epidemiologic research in reproductive health.

Abbreviations

PPV, Positive predictive value; NPV, Negative predictive value; BMI, Body mass index.

Ethical Approval

Permission to access medical journals was obtained from the Region of Southern Denmark (21/49588, October 6, 2021). The use of data from the national registers was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (FSEID-00004511). Due to Danish legislation, approval from Ethics Committee was not needed.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Emma Simonsen, Maria H. Stoltz-Andersen, Sophie Lund Elkrog, and Debbie Rosenlyst Ollerup for their work on entering data into REDCap.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.