105
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW

Efficacy of Acupuncture in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

, ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 707-720 | Received 01 Dec 2023, Accepted 14 Feb 2024, Published online: 11 Mar 2024
 

Abstract

Purpose

The effect of acupuncture as adjunctive therapy for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) was controversial. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effects of acupuncture for treating AECOPD.

Methods

Eight databases were searched from database inception to July 30, 2023. All RCTs compared acupuncture plus conventional western medicine with conventional western medicine alone were included. Outcomes were quality of life, lung function, blood oxygen condition, exercise capacity, daily symptoms, duration of hospitalization, and adverse events. The statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 17.0, and methodological quality was measured by the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of evidence.

Results

Twelve studies including 915 patients were included. Compared with conventional western medicine alone, acupuncture combined with conventional western therapy significantly improved quality of life (CAT: MD: −3.25; 95% CI: −3.73 to −2.78, P<0.001) and arterial blood gas (PaCO2: MD: −1.85; 95% CI: −2.74 to −0.95, P<0.001; PaO2: MD: 5.15; 95% CI: 1.22 to 9.07, P = 0.01). And for lung function, statistical benefits were found in FEV1/FVC (MD: 4.66; 95% CI: 2.21 to 7.12, P<0.001), but no difference was seen for FEV1% (MD: 1.83; 95% CI: −0.17 to 3.83, P = 0.073). There was no significant improvement in exercise capacity (6MWD: MD: 96.69; 95% CI: −0.60 to 193.98, P = 0.051), hospitalization duration (MD: −5.70; 95% CI: −11.97 to 0.58, P = 0.075), and dyspnea (mMRC: MD: −0.19; 95% CI: −0.61 to 0.63, P = 0.376) between two groups. Overall bias for CAT and mMRC was in “high” risk, FEV1%, FEV1/FVC, PaCO2, and PaO2 was in “some concern” and 1 RCT assessing hospitalization duration was in “low” risk. And the overall assessments were either moderate, low or very low certainty. Seven trials performed safety assessment of acupuncture, and no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Acupuncture might have auxiliary effects on AECOPD. However, the quality of the evidence is limited, and more high-quality RCTs are needed to be performed in the future.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics Approval and Informed Consent

All data used for this review were extracted from published RCTs; thus, ethics approval and patient consent were not required. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Innovation Team and Talents Cultivation Program of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. (No: ZYYCXTD-D-202003).