74
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Propofol and Dexmedetomidine Ameliorate Endotoxemia-Associated Encephalopathy via Inhibiting Ferroptosis

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 1349-1368 | Received 04 Jan 2024, Accepted 19 Apr 2024, Published online: 23 Apr 2024
 

Abstract

Background

Sepsis is recognized as a multiorgan and systemic damage caused by dysregulated host response to infection. Its acute systemic inflammatory response highly resembles that of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced endotoxemia. Propofol and dexmedetomidine are two commonly used sedatives for mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients and have been reported to alleviate cognitive impairment in many diseases. In this study, we aimed to explore and compare the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on the encephalopathy induced by endotoxemia and to investigate whether ferroptosis is involved, finally providing experimental evidence for multi-drug combination in septic sedation.

Methods

A total of 218 C57BL/6J male mice (20–25 g, 6–8 weeks) were used. Morris water maze (MWM) tests were performed to evaluate whether propofol and dexmedetomidine attenuated LPS-induced cognitive deficits. Brain injury was evaluated using Nissl and Fluoro-Jade C (FJC) staining. Neuroinflammation was assessed by dihydroethidium (DHE) and DCFH-DA staining and by measuring the levels of three cytokines. The number of Iba1+ and GFAP+ cells was used to detect the activation of microglia and astrocytes. To explore the involvement of ferroptosis, the levels of ptgs2 and chac1; the content of iron, malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione (GSH); and the expression of ferroptosis-related proteins were investigated.

Conclusion

The single use of propofol and dexmedetomidine mitigated LPS-induced cognitive impairment, while the combination showed poor performance. In alleviating endotoxemic neural loss and degeneration, the united sedative group exhibited the most potent capability. Both propofol and dexmedetomidine inhibited neuroinflammation, while propofol’s effect was slightly weaker. All sedative groups reduced the neural apoptosis, inhibited the activation of microglia and astrocytes, and relieved neurologic ferroptosis. The combined group was most prominent in combating genetic and biochemical alterations of ferroptosis. Fpn1 may be at the core of endotoxemia-related ferroptosis activation.

Data Sharing Statement

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the first author.

Ethics Approval

All animal studies were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Fudan University Pudong Medical Center and conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Acknowledgment

This project was supported by the Key Specialty Construction Project of Pudong Health and Family Planning Commission of Shanghai (PWZzk2017-06).

Disclosure

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.