25
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparative Bleeding Risk of Brand Vs Generic Rivaroxaban in Elderly Inpatients with Atrial Fibrillation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1573-1582 | Received 15 Jan 2024, Accepted 03 May 2024, Published online: 16 May 2024
 

Abstract

Objective

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormal heart rhythm in elderly patients. Rivaroxaban has been widely used for stroke prevention. The anticoagulant response to rivaroxaban increases with age, which may make elderly patients susceptible to adverse outcomes resulting from small differences in bioavailability between generic and brand products.

Methods

We designed a cohort study of ≥65-year-old inpatients with AF. Sociodemographic and laboratory measures of qualified patients who received brand or generic rivaroxaban for at least 72 hours at the study hospital from January 2021 to June 2023 were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome was the incidence of bleeding.

Results

A total of 1008 qualifying patients were included for analysis, with 626 (62.1%) receiving brand rivaroxaban and 382 (37.9%) receiving generic rivaroxaban. After propensity score matching and weighting to account for confounders, the odds ratios comparing brand vs generic rivaroxaban (95% confidence intervals) for the bleeding was 1.15 (0.72–1.82). Results from subgroup analyses of patients with age ≥85, HAS-BLED score ≥ 3, containment of antiplatelet drugs, and female patients were consistent with the primary analysis.

Conclusion

It provides evidence regarding the clinical safety outcome of generic rivaroxaban in the elderly AF population that may be particularly susceptible to adverse outcomes resulting from small allowable differences in pharmacokinetics.

QR Code

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/yFoM9Cvhh6k

Video Abstract

© 2024 Chen et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

Disclosure

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by Jinhua Central Hospital Youth Research Foundation (Grant NO: JY2022-2-03), Key Science and Technology Plan Projects of Jinhua City (Grant NO: 2023-3-122, 2023-3-104).