Abstract
Objective
Based on the analysis of the images of acromial slide, we explored the application of percutaneous ultrasound-guided subacromial bursography (PUSB) on rotator cuff tear (RCT) in diagnosing elderly patients with shoulder pain.
Methods
Eighty-five patients who were clinically diagnosed with RCT and underwent PUSB examination in the department of ultrasound in our hospital were enrolled as the subjects. Independent samples t-test was used to analyze the general characteristics. Based on the gold standard of shoulder arthroscopy, the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PUSB was evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated as well. The consistency of these techniques with shoulder arthroscopy in diagnosing the RCT stage was additionally compared using Kappa test.
Results
In patients with large full-thickness RCT, the 100% detection rate was achieved by the techniques of ultrasound, MRI, and PUSB. For patients with small full-thickness RCT, the detection rate of PUSB (100%) was evidently higher than those of ultrasound and MRI. Similar results were shown in the detection rates of patients with bursal-side partial-thickness RCT (90.5%) and articular-side partial-thickness RCT (86.9%). More importantly, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PUSB in patients with both full-thickness RCT and partial-thickness RCT were significantly better than those of ultrasound and MRI.
Conclusion
PUSB has a better efficacy in the detection of RCT than ultrasound and MRI, showing its feasibility as an important imaging method to evaluate the degree of RCT.
Data Sharing Statement
The analyzed data sets generated during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.