Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to analysis of the opioid use of opioid native zoster-related pain (ZRP) patients to evaluate the impact of opioid use on pain control and quality of life improvement based on the clinical database.
Patients and Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify opioid native patients who were hospitalized in the pain department between May 1, 2020, and May 1, 2021. The primary outcomes were persistent opioid use after discharge, visual analogue scale (VAS) at the admission, VAS remission rate during hospitalization, VAS score and quality of life at follow-up. Then, we assessed patient-level risk factors for persistent opioid use after the discharge.
Results
A total of 350 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 255 (72.9%) were administered with opioid during hospitalization, and 95 (27.1%) patients were not. Opioid prescription during hospitalization was independently associated with increased odds of persistent use after the discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 20.74; 95% CI, 4.504–95.474; P < 0.01). In the two groups, the VAS score at admission and the VAS score at follow-up were different. In the group with opioids during hospitalization, the persistent opioid use after discharge was more common (38% vs 2.1%) compared to patients without opioids, and VAS remission rate during hospitalization was less, restrictions on daily life, work or housework, and social activities were more common, and mood, diet and sleep were worse, respectively.
Conclusion
Opioids prescription during hospitalization might increase the risk of chronic opioid use in opioid native ZRP patients, and it has limited benefits in pain control and quality of life improvement. Even though PHN was painful and intractable, the use of opioids should also be more cautious, and strict follow-up, management in this population.
Data Sharing Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.