Effect of Contact-Restricted Basic Life Support Training During the Nation’s Contact Restriction Policy on Learning Outcomes

Abstract

Objective

Basic life support (BLS) training aimed at building knowledge and skills in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. During training, there is the possibility of airborne COVID-19 transmission. The aim was to evaluate students’ knowledge, skills, and course satisfaction following contact-restricted BLS training under the contact restriction policy.

Methods

From July 2020 to January 2021, a prospective, descriptive study was conducted among fifth-year dental students. Contact-restricted BLS training consisted of online learning, online pre-testing, non-contact training with automated real-time feedback manikins, and remote monitoring. The participants’ skills, knowledge through online testing, and course satisfaction were all evaluated after training. At three months and six months after training, their knowledge was re-evaluated through online testing.

Results

Fifty-five participants were included in this study. Their mean (SD) knowledge scores after training, at three and six months, were 81.5 (10.8)%, 71.1 (16.4)%, and 65.8 (14.5)%, respectively. The percentage of participants, who passed the skills test on their first, second, and third attempts had been 83.6%, 94.5%, and 100%, respectively. The mean (SD) satisfaction score with the course was 4.87 (0.34) on a five-point Likert score. After training, no participants had COVID-19 infection.

Conclusion

Training in contact-restricted BLS had produced acceptable knowledge, skills, and satisfaction results. Knowledge tests, competence tests, and course satisfaction were comparable to conventional pre-pandemic trainings with similar participants. Due to the significant dangers of aerosol disease transmission, it became a viable training alternative.

Trial Registration

TCTR20210503001 (Thai Clinical Trials Registry).

Keywords:

• basic life support training
• contact restrictions
• COVID-19 pandemic
• evaluation
• online learning

Data Sharing Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The institutional review board (Centre for Ethics in Human Research at the Khon Kaen University in Thailand) approved this study (Registration number: HE631380). Prior to beginning the study, all participants consented to participate.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

There was no funding.