238
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Functional Profile of a Customized Wound Parameter in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Corneal Incision for Cataract Surgery

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 175-181 | Received 16 Aug 2022, Accepted 09 Dec 2022, Published online: 11 Jan 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of optimized parameters of femtosecond laser for cataract surgery corneal incisions regarding opening, patency and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA).

Patients and Methods

Patients scheduled for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery between May 2018 and December 2018 were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were a healthy preoperative cornea and uneventful FLACS. Exclusion criteria were preoperative corneal astigmatism over 1.0 D, previous corneal trauma or pathologies. Clinical data were obtained from the electronic medical records. Surgical planning was based on Scheimpflug tomography images for keratometric data. At postoperative day 60, new keratometric evaluation was performed, obtained using the same device.

Results

101 eyes (61 patients) matched the criteria for SIA analysis. Overall mean SIA was 0.44 ± 0.33 D (0–1.55 D). Axis and size did not have any statistically significant effects on SIA. The overall centroid of the SIA was 0.11. For the opening analysis, was included 156 eyes (79 patients). Successful opening in 87.7% of cases (137 eyes). Temporal incisions had the highest success rate (98.36%).

Conclusion

These femtosecond laser parameters showed high opening rates with low opening times. These optimized parameters led to a low incidence of SIA and high predictability regardless of incision site and size. The association between incision opening and SIA was not statistically significant. There was, however, an association between incision opening success and site.

Disclosure

All authors have received research funding from Alcon Labs, Irvine, CA. Jonathan Clive Lake and Celso Boianovsky are consultants for Alcon Labs, Glaukos, and Johnson and Johnson. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.