Dynamic Infrared Imaging of Vitreous Floaters

Abstract

Background and Objective

To evaluate the use of dynamic infrared (IR) imaging as a tool for the objective evaluation of symptomatic vitreous floaters and to correlate it with the patient symptomatology.

Study Design/Materials and Methods

Retrospective study that examined 66 eyes of 44 patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic vitreous opacities. Patients were imaged using the Heidelberg Spectralis dynamic infrared (IR) image in video mode to record the vitreous movements and shadow artifacts within 30 degrees of the center of the macula. Patients were also asked how symptomatic their vitreous floaters were from absent to severe. After reviewing IR videos and OCT, a grading system was created to evaluate the floaters and a masked reader was asked to evaluate the videos and OCT based on the grading system created.

Results

A total of 66 eyes were identified and examined with the IR videos, 50 were symptomatic, and 16 were asymptomatic. After masked review and analysis of the IR videos, there were 4 characteristics that correlated with the patient’s symptoms: size, location, movement, and density of obscuration of the OCT B Scan by the vitreous opacity. A table with grading of these characteristics was created to analyze how symptomatic patients were. A masked grader was asked to grade the videos and OCT using the grading system created. A positive correlation was found between the masked grader and the symptoms of patients. (0.70039; p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

Dynamic IR video capture of vitreous opacities is a new imaging technique that can qualitatively assess vitreous opacities in a way that correlates to a patient’s symptoms. This imaging modality can provide a qualitative assessment of the patient’s severity of symptoms based on the location, density, and movement of the visualized vitreous opacities in the imaged video.

Keywords:

• floaters
• infrared imaging
• vitreous opacities
• vitreous gel
• myodesopsias

Patient Consent

Written informed consent for publication of their details was obtained from the patients.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.