Abstract
Purpose
To study visual recovery and identify the factors that may affect it in patients with ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy (EON).
Patients and Methods
Medical charts of patients who developed optic neuropathy after ethambutol (EMB) treatment for tuberculosis infection were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic details and clinical data were examined to assess visual recovery after discontinuation of ethambutol treatment. The univariate and multivariate relationships between various factors and visual recovery were evaluated using regression analysis.
Results
Of 5394 patients diagnosed with tuberculosis infection and treated with EMB, 23 patients (0.43%) were diagnosed with EON. Logistic regression analysis found that female sex was the categorical factor significantly associated with good visual recovery with an odds ratio of 12.0 (95% confidence interval 1.56, 92.29; p = 0.02), while linear regression analysis identified good initial visual acuity as the numerical factor significantly related with it (p < 0.001). After adjustment with multivariate analysis, initial visual acuity was found to be the only significant factor associated with visual recovery. All patients with initial visual acuity of better than 20/200 at first visit achieved good visual recovery.
Conclusion
The incidence of EON in patients treated with EMB was 0.43% in this hospital-based study. Good visual recovery was noted in 39.13% of these patients, and initial visual acuity was the factor that affected visual recovery. It is recommended that patients on EMB have regular screening by an ophthalmologist for early detection of the disease, and if it is discovered, that the use of the drug be immediately discontinued in order to prevent potentially devastating visual loss.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Phalin Kamolwat, the Director of the Division of Tuberculosis, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, for data and valuable suggestions; Associate Professor Dr. Dusit Sujirarat, Department of Research and Technology Assessment, Rajavithi Hospital, for assistance with the statistical analysis; Dr. Niracha Arjkongharn, Department of Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, for assistance with data collection; and Mr. John Flanagan for assistance with the English-language presentation of the manuscript.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.