259
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Long Term Clinical Outcomes of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Versions of a Trifocal IOL with the Same Optical Design

ORCID Icon
Pages 623-632 | Received 16 Jan 2023, Accepted 10 Feb 2023, Published online: 21 Feb 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

To show the visual and refractive outcomes in Asian eyes with cataract when bilaterally implanted with either a hydrophobic FineVision POD F GF or a hydrophilic FineVision POD F intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods

Forty-six patients were randomized to receive POD F GF or POD F IOLs. Visual and refractive outcomes were assessed up to 24 months post-surgery. Measurements included uncorrected-distance visual acuity, corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), refraction, defocus curve, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

Mean spherical equivalent was close to emmetropia for both groups and stable across postoperative visits. Overall, 97.73% and 100% of eyes in the POD F GF IOL group and 95.65% and 100%, of eyes in the POD F IOL group were within ±1.00D of the target refraction at 12 and 24 months, respectively. All patients showed a CDVA of ≥20/25 at 12- and 24-months post-surgery. In both groups, 24 months post-surgery 91% of patients presented a DCIVA of ≥20/25 and 83.3% of patients had a DCNVA of ≥20/25. Defocus curve showed continuous visual acuity, being 20/32 or better in both groups over a 4.00D range between 1.00D and −3.00/-3.50D. Both groups showed good contrast sensitivity values for photopic and mesopic conditions. Overall, 86.4%, 86.4%, and 72.7% of patients implanted with the POD F GF IOL reported not wearing glasses at all for distance, intermediate, and near vision, respectively. These values were 81.8%, 86.4%, and 90.9% for patients implanted with the POD F IOL. Both groups of patients reported similar satisfaction percentages (100% very satisfied/satisfied) and would recommend the procedure (100% definitively yes/probably yes).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates good visual and refractive outcomes for both the FineVision POD F GF and the FineVision POD F IOLs when implanted in Asian eyes.

Data Sharing Statement

Data are not available for sharing.

Disclosure

R. Ang has received research grants from Acevision, Inc., Acufocus, Inc., Bausch&Lomb, Inc.; Beaver-Visitec International, Glaukos Corp., Ivantis, Inc., Hoya, Ivantis, Johnson&Johnson Vision, and STAAR Surgical. The author reports no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by PhysIOL s.a., Liege, Belgium, part of Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. [BVI], Waltham, USA.