Neuroprotection for Nonarteritic Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Lessons from Acute Ischemic Stroke

Abstract

Nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion (NA-CRAO) is a variant of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and is a cause of sudden severe loss of vision. There are guidelines by the American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association for the care of CRAO patients. This review explores the basis of retinal neuroprotection for CRAO and its potential for improving the outcome of NA-CRAO. Recently, there have been significant advances in research into the use of neuroprotection to treat retinal diseases, including retinal detachment, age-related macular degeneration, and inherited retinal diseases. Also, neuroprotective research in AIS has been extensive, and newer drugs tested, including Uric acid, Nerinetide, and Otaplimastat, with promising results. Progress in cerebral neuroprotection after AIS offers hope for retinal neuroprotection after CRAO; and a possibility of extrapolating research findings from AIS into CRAO. Combining neuroprotection and thrombolysis can extend the therapeutic window for NA-CRAO treatment and potentially improve outcomes. Experimented neuroprotection for CRAO includes Angiopoietin (Comp Ang1), KUS 121, Gene therapy (XIAP), and hypothermia. Efforts in the field of neuroprotection for NA-CRAO should focus on better imaging to delineate the penumbra after an acute episode of NA-CRAO (using a combination of high-definition optical coherence angiography and electrophysiology). Also, research should explore details of pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in NA-CRAO, allowing for further neuroprotective intervention, and closing the gap between preclinical and clinical neuroprotection.

Keywords:

• neuroprotection
• non-arteritic central retinal artery occlusion
• thrombolysis
• acute ischemic stroke

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Dr. Adekunle Hassan for the advice and support given to us during the preparation of this manuscript. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients whose figures were used in this manuscript.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.