Abstract
Purpose
Ocular vascular diseases are common causes of visual impairment and blindness, for which anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is the first-line therapy. Current study describes the profile of patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (IVI), and gender variation in Bhutan. The study was designed to inform national health policy.
Study Design
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Methods
We reviewed the surgical registers of the vitreoretinal (VR) units across Bhutan over three years. Patient demography, clinical findings, diagnostic tests performed, and diagnoses or indications for IVI were logged. A descriptive analysis was performed.
Results
Despite limited availability of anti-VEGF, a total of 381 patients received IVI in operating theatres as mandated by the national guidelines. The majority of patients were males (230, 60.4%, p = 0.004). The mean age was 65.2 ± 13.5 years (range 13 years to 90 years), and a median of 69 years. The majority of the treated eyes (117, 30.7%) had BCVA <3/60 to light perception (PL), and another 51 eyes (13.4%) had < 6/60 to 3/60. The most common indication for IVI was neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) (168 cases, 42.2%), followed by retinal vein occlusion (RVO) (132 cases, 34.6%), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and retinopathy (DR) (50 cases, 13.1%), and myopic choroidal neovascular membrane (11 cases, 0.03%).
Conclusion
Limited human resources for managing VR diseases in Bhutan are compounded by economic and geographic challenges. With increasing VR diseases such as nAMD and myopia and complications of systemic diseases such as DR, DMO and RVO, there is a need to improve VR services. Currently, anti-VEGF is procured only for a pooled patients requiring IVI, and patients are lost due to longer waiting periods. Bhutan needs to assess if females are reporting less or are not receiving treatment due to cultural barriers and social stigma.
Data Sharing Statement
The data and material are available from the corresponding author.
Ethical Approval, Informed Consent and Consent for Publication
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of Health (REBH) (REBH/Approval/2016/083), Ministry of Health, Royal Government of Bhutan, and was conducted as per the REBH guidelines and tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The consent was waived by REBH as the retrospective study collected only the de-identified data.
Disclosure
BBR reports a scholarship provided by the Australian National University that supported the study. TM report grants from the MRFF Biotechnology Bridge (BTB) Program – research grant number: BTBR100196, during the conduct of the study; and grants from Konan Medical USA, outside the submitted work. In addition, he has a patent application (P0040304AU) on novel analysis methods for mfPOP/OFA pending to Konan Medical USA. He owns shares from EyeCo Pty Ltd. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.