157
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer

Pages 2125-2131 | Received 16 May 2023, Accepted 13 Jul 2023, Published online: 25 Jul 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the refractive accuracy resulting from calculations based on measurements with a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer compared to calculations based on measurements with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer at one month postoperatively.

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative non-interventional study of preoperative biometry and postoperative refraction and visual acuity of 200 eyes. All eyes had preoperative biometry with both the Argos (Movu, a Santec company) and Lenstar LS900 (Haag-Streit AG) devices. Data were collected for mean postoperative prediction error (directional and absolute), preoperative mean K, delta K (corneal astigmatism), axial length, and anterior chamber depth.

Results

The mean directional prediction error was −0.15 ± 0.47 D for Argos and −0.31 ± 0.50 D for Lenstar LS900, and there was a statistically significant mean of the differences (0.16 ± 0.24 D; p < 0.001). The mean absolute prediction error was 0.35 ± 0.34 D for Argos and 0.42 ± 0.41 D for Lenstar LS900, and there was a statistically significant mean of the differences (−0.07 ± 0.24 D; p < 0.001). Neither the differences in directional prediction error nor the differences in absolute prediction error were clinically significant.

Conclusion

The directional and absolute prediction accuracies were statistically significant, but not clinically different between the Argos and Lenstar LS900 devices. In addition, differences between preoperative K, AL, and ACD measurements were not clinically significant.

Disclosure

Brad Hall reports that he has received consulting fees from Ace Vision Group outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported with an investigator-initiated study grant (67464611) from Alcon Vision, LLC, Fort Worth, TX, USA.