159
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

A Retrospective Study of Ocular Cancer in Saudi Arabia: 25-Year Analysis

, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 3103-3111 | Received 26 Aug 2023, Accepted 10 Oct 2023, Published online: 19 Oct 2023
 

Abstract

Background

Ocular malignancies are uncommon among eye diseases; however, they jeopardize both vision and life. The main objective of this study was to use to describe the epidemiology of eye and ocular adnexa malignancies across different ages and sex.

Methods

The King Khaled University institutional review board approved this study. Data on ocular cancer were retrieved from the Saudi Cancer Registry between 1994 and 2018. The registry collected important patient information such as demographic information (age, gender, and nationality), clinical details, and tumor classification.

Results

The total number of cases with ocular cancer diagnosed was 1051 cases. The highest number was recorded in Riyadh (35.39%, n=372), followed by Makkah (16.93%, n=178). The incidence was higher in the 0–4 years’ age group (55.21%), and it got down as people got older. The data also revealed differences in the number of reported cases over time, as well as in the representation of eye cancer cases by gender and nationality. While many ocular cancer pathologies were seen, with “Retinoblastoma, not otherwise specified” being the most common (53.32%), the incidence rates for males and females remained largely stable over time.

Conclusion

The study emphasizes the need for continued monitoring, research, and analysis of potential of epidemiology of ocular cancer occurrence in Saudi Arabia. Identifying the geographical distribution and age pattern of Ocular malignancies have the potential to assist healthcare authorities and policymakers in developing precise strategies to reduce, recognize at an early stage, and successfully manage this condition.

Data Sharing Statement

Data available upon request by emailing the corresponding author.

Ethical Approval

The King Khaled University’s institutional review board provided ethical approval. All respondents provided written consent in accordance with IRB standards based on local laws. The study followed the guidelines set forth in the Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for Publication

The study was approved by the Ethical committee of the King Khalid University [IRB: ECM#2023-2304].

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This research received no external funding.