912
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Safety and efficacy of temsirolimus in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

, , , , , & show all
Pages 101-106 | Received 31 Jan 2011, Accepted 14 May 2011, Published online: 08 Jul 2011
 

Abstract

Background. First line treatment with temsirolimus is considered standard of care in poor risk patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The role of temsirolimus in pretreated patients with any risk profile is unclear. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the impact of temsirolimus in patients who had progressed on various treatment lines. Material and methods. From April 2007 to July 2009, all patients who had progressed on receptor-tyrosine kinase-inhibitors, VEGF-antibodies and other agents were treated with temsirolimus (25 mg weekly). Physical examination, white blood cell count and chemistry were obtained weekly and tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks. Results. Thirty patients with a median age of 68 years range (44–81) received treatment with temsirolimus. Most patients were categorized intermediate risk (60%) and the majority had three or more metastatic sites (56.7%). Temsirolimus was median the fourth (range 2–5) systemic treatment line. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rare and consisted of anemia, thrombocytopenia and hyperglycemia. Objective remission and stable disease were achieved in 13.3% and 60% of the patients, respectively. The median progression free survival was 4.9 months (2.93–6.81 95% CI). Conclusion. Temsirolimus appears feasible, safe and active in heavily pretreated patients.

Declaration of interest: Manuela Schmidinger has acted as an adviser to Pfizer, Novartis, Roche and GSK, has received research and travel grants from Pfizer and lecture fees from Pfizer, Novartis and Roche. Christoph Zielinski has acted as an adviser to Pfizer and Roche, has received lecture fees from Pfizer, Merck, Lilly and Roche. Gero Kramer has received research grants from Sanofi Aventis, Bayer-Schering and Takeda, lecture fees from Sanofi Aventis, Astra Zeneca and Astellas, acted as an advisor to Sanofi Aventis and received travel grants from Pfizer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi Aventis and Bayer-Schering. Ursula Vogl, Wolfgang Lamm, Marija Bojic and Christoph Klingler have no conflicts of interest to declare. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.