Urban or moral decay?: the case of twentieth century Detroit

Abstract

This paper provides an alternative narrative of Detroit from one of economic struggle and racial division. It instead discusses other forces at play, focusing on questionable moral standing and its relationship to built form, specifically the city. The paper explores whether a compelling claim on building’s moral use can be established, and in doing so seeks to establish a causal link between moral relationship and the built environment. Moral relationship is established through three main avenues. The first is a brief discussion of Detroit’s history, particularly its history from WWII onward, in order to establish the complex moral context into which this argument is situated. The second avenue provides a concise summary of Stanley Cavell’s moral framework and discusses the conundrum of having moral obligation in the absence of moral relationship. The final avenue is a look to the famous Renaissance Center as emblematic of the moral relationship at play. The resulting form of analysis relies on the premises that buildings can embody the knowledge and agreement required for (moral) relationship, and that buildings are artifacts of moral relationship. The paper concludes that buildings are therefore morally appraisable, which is to say they can be appraised for their moral appropriateness.

Keywords:

• urban planning
• architecture
• ethics
• Detroit
• housing
• economics
• justice
• morality
• philosophy
• Cavell

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Carolyn Fahey

CAROLYN FAHEY Dr. Fahey is founding editor of Architecture Philosophy and has previously published with Architecture Research Quarterly. She currently works as an urban planner for the City of Boulder and is Fellow at the University of Colorado’s Center for Sustainable Urbanism (CCSU).