Abstract
This study explores the effects of tax-related news on government accountability in the United States. When exposed to news that framed the taxpayer as the ultimate sponsor of public spending to whom the government is accountable, people reacted indistinguishably from those who read no tax news. However, when exposed to identically valenced news that framed the taxpayer in procedural terms of tax collection, they responded with higher accountability demands. This suggests that in contexts where citizens are socialized into taxpayer-entitling discourse, this perspective can become the default framework, leading citizens to claim oversight rights when denied this discursively privileged position.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Rachel Young, Melissa Tully, William Reisinger, Frank Durham and Julianna Pacheco for their insightful comments at various stages of this project.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Correction Statement
This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Volha Kananovich
Volha Kananovich (Ph.D., The University of Iowa) is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication at Appalachian State University. Her research examines the role of political and media discourse in (de)legitimizing various forms of politically meaningful citizen engagement with the state. Her work has been published in The International Journal of Press/Politics, the Atlantic Journal of Communication, Journalism Studies, and The International Journal of Communication, among other publications