ABSTRACT
The war in Ukraine has exposed a rift between Serbia and the Brussels administration. Serbia has been accused of aligning itself with Russia as opposed to the strictly pro-Ukrainian EU. While Serbian foreign policy can be argued to be primarily influenced by Belgrade’s pan-Slavic relationship with Moscow, or authoritarian solidarity due to Serbia’s own semi-authoritarian character, this study argues that Serbia’s foreign policy reflects the current setting and the opportunities created by the major power rivalry. We reflect on the inefficiency of the EU norm and value promotion, and the rising influence of Russia and China in the Western Balkan region, which has been undermining the EU’s push for democratization and Europeanization. We argue that the Serbian foreign policy aims to maintain the domestic regime’s power and maximize benefits by exploiting the escalating rivalry between the two blocs rather than to pose a direct normative challenge to the established EU standards.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
5. For Serbia’s status as a hybrid regime, see Fiket and Đorđević (Citation2022).
6. It is also highlighted that the creation of an uneven playing field for competing parties as a result of ‘media bias and abuse of government resources’ undermined the conduct of a free and fair democratic process in 2016 election (NDI National Democratic Institute Citation2016, 5).
7. For the EU’s reactions to successive Serbian elections, see Radeljić and Đorđević (Citation2020, 602–603).
9. It is noteworthy to highlight that there is a vast amount of literature stemming from neoclassical realism that accounts for both levels of analysis (international and internal). For examples, see Götz (Citation2021), Gvalia et al. (Citation2019), Lobell et al. (Citation2009), Meibauer (Citation2020), Rose (Citation1998).
Pavlović, D. 2023. Is European enlargement policy a form of non-democracy promotion? Journal of International Relations and Development 26, no. 2: 324–46. doi:10.1057/s41268-022-00286-8. Radeljić, B., ed. 2013. Europe and the Post-Yugoslav space. Farnham: Ashgate. Radeljić, B. 2018. Semi-authoritarianism accepted: The European Union’s problematic involvement in Serbia. Annual of the Institute for Sociological, Political and Juridical Research 42: 67–82. Radeljić, B. 2019b. What Europeanization? Getting away with corruption in the Progressivists-dominated Serbia. In Balkanizing Europeanization: Fight against corruption and regional relations in the Western Balkans, ed. V. Djordjević and V. Vučković, 129–50. Berlin: Peter Lang. Gafuri, A., and M. Muftuler-Bac. 2021. Caught between stability and democracy in the Western Balkans: A comparative analysis of paths of accession to the European Union. East European Politics 37, no. 2: 267–91. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1781094. Grimm, S., and O.L. Mathis. 2015. Stability first, development second, democracy third: The European Union’s policy towards the post-conflict Western Balkans, 1991–2010. Europe-Asia Studies 67, no. 6: 916–47. doi:10.1080/09668136.2015.1055237. Smith, N.R., N. Markovic Khaze, and M. Kovacevic. 2021. The EU’s stability-democracy dilemma in the context of the problematic accession of the Western Balkan states. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 29, no. 2: 169–83. doi:10.1080/14782804.2020.1823823. Soyaltin-Colella, D., ed. 2022a. EU good governance promotion in the Age of democratic decline. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978-3-031-05781-6. Zweers, W., G. Cretti, M. de Boon, A. Dafa, S. Subotić, M. Muk, A. Fetahu, A. Abazi Imeri, E. Kuhinja, and H. Kujraković. 2022. The EU as a promoter of democracy or ‘stabilitocracy’ in the Western Balkans? Clingendael. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2022-02/the-eu-as-a-promoter-of-democracy-or-stabilitocracy.pdf. Radeljić, B. 2017b. Serbia’s delayed transformation: Illiberal practices, external approvals and the politics of opportunity. East European & Balkan Studies 41, no. 1: 129–57. doi:10.19170/EEBS.2017.41.1.129. Radeljić, B. 2018. Semi-authoritarianism accepted: The European Union’s problematic involvement in Serbia. Annual of the Institute for Sociological, Political and Juridical Research 42: 67–82. Radeljić, B. 2019b. What Europeanization? Getting away with corruption in the Progressivists-dominated Serbia. In Balkanizing Europeanization: Fight against corruption and regional relations in the Western Balkans, ed. V. Djordjević and V. Vučković, 129–50. Berlin: Peter Lang. Radeljić, B. 2019a. Tolerating semi-authoritarianism? Contextualising the EU’s relationship with Serbia and Kosovo. In The Europeanisation of the Western Balkans: A failure of EU conditionality?, ed. J. Džankić, S. Keil, and M. Kmezić, 157–80. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91412-1_8. Radeljić, B., and V. Đorđević. 2020. Clientelism and the abuse of power in the Western Balkans. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 22, no. 5: 597–612. doi:10.1080/19448953.2020.1799299. Castaldo, A. 2020. Back to competitive authoritarianism? Democratic backsliding in Vučić’s Serbia. Europe-Asia Studies 72, no. 10: 1617–38. doi:10.1080/09668136.2020.1817860. Gafuri, A., and M. Muftuler-Bac. 2021. Caught between stability and democracy in the Western Balkans: A comparative analysis of paths of accession to the European Union. East European Politics 37, no. 2: 267–91. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1781094. Jeftić, L. 2023. Serbian Progressive party’s shameless normalization of expressing sycophancy toward the leader. Journal of Language and Politics 22, no. 2: 163–84. doi:10.1075/jlp.21071.jef. Pavlović, D. 2020. The political economy behind the gradual demise of democratic institutions in Serbia. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20, no. 1: 19–39. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1672929. Radeljić, B. 2018. Semi-authoritarianism accepted: The European Union’s problematic involvement in Serbia. Annual of the Institute for Sociological, Political and Juridical Research 42: 67–82. Radeljić, B. 2019a. Tolerating semi-authoritarianism? Contextualising the EU’s relationship with Serbia and Kosovo. In The Europeanisation of the Western Balkans: A failure of EU conditionality?, ed. J. Džankić, S. Keil, and M. Kmezić, 157–80. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91412-1_8. Tomić, S., and D. Pavlović. 2023. Blatant, not latent: Patronage in top-level appointments in Serbia. Journal of Public Administration and Policy 16, no. 1: 181–209. doi:10.2478/nispa-2023-0008. Fiket, I., and B. Đorđević. 2022. Promises and challenges of deliberative and participatory innovations in hybrid regimes: The case of two citizens’ assemblies in Serbia. Filozofija i društvo 33, no. 1: 3–25. doi:10.2298/FID2201003F. Radeljić, B., and V. Đorđević. 2020. Clientelism and the abuse of power in the Western Balkans. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 22, no. 5: 597–612. doi:10.1080/19448953.2020.1799299. Ilić, V. 2022. Parliamentary and election boycotts in hybrid regimes: Evidence from Southeastern Europe. Serbian Political Thought 78, no. 4: 197–217. doi:10.22182/spm.7842022.11. Soyaltin-Colella, D. 2022b. The EU accession process, Chinese finance and rising corruption in Western Balkan stabilitocracies: Serbia and Montenegro. Europe-Asia Studies 1–25. doi:10.1080/09668136.2022.2115013. Götz, E. 2021. Neoclassical realist theories, intervening variables, and paradigmatic boundaries. Foreign Policy Analysis 17 (2). doi:10.1093/fpa/oraa026. Gvalia, G., B. Lebanidze, and D.S. Siroky. 2019. Neoclassical realism and small states: Systemic constraints and domestic filters in Georgia’s foreign policy. East European Politics 35, no. 1: 21–51. doi:10.1080/21599165.2019.1581066. Lobell, S.E., N.M. Ripsman, and J.W. Taliaferro, eds. 2009. Neoclassical realism, the state, and foreign policy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Meibauer, G. 2020. Interests, ideas, and the study of state behaviour in neoclassical realism. Review of International Studies 46, no. 1: 20–36. doi:10.1017/S0260210519000214. Additional information
Notes on contributors
Branislav Radeljić
Branislav Radeljić is Professor of International Relations in the Department of Government and Society, United Arab Emirates University. In addition, he serves as Visiting Professor of European Politics at Nebrija University. His scholarly interests focus on European and Middle Eastern political and socio-economic developments. Outside academia, on an occasional basis, he conducts research and provides consultancy services within his area of expertise. He is also a registered expert witness for asylum, refugee, and immigration cases, and he covers Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Russia, Serbia, and Turkey.
M. Cüneyt Özşahin
M. Cüneyt Özşahin is Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science and International Relations at Necmettin Erbakan University. His research interests include theories of international relations, security studies, and Turkish politics. His publications have appeared in various edited volumes and journals, most recently in Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Contemporary Review of the Middle East, and Europe-Asia Studies. He is also a frequent contributor to Turkish media outlets, writing on regional as well as domestic politics and security.
![Sample our Humanities journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5939/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Humanities.jpg"})