Distributive justice and development: Toward an integrative understanding of reward and responsibility distributions

Figures & data

Figure 1. The flow of reward/responsibility distributions and turn-taking of burdens/benefits and the relationship between those in a methodological paradigm on children’s fairness judgments in resource allocation.

Figure 2. The relationship between cross-sectional rules (commonly shared rules) and meta-rule (rule-application rule) in making a fairness judgment.

Table 1. Four allocation types in first-person situations (reward and responsibility; Hashimoto & Toda, 2019).

	Reward distribution		Responsibility distribution
	Self-contribution condition (The self-made more)	Other-contribution condition (The other made more)	Self-benefit condition (Only the self-played)	Other-benefit condition (Only the other played)
Equity	More to self	More to other	Self only	Other only
Equality	Equal	Equal	Both	Both
Selfish	More to self	More to self or equal	Other only or Both	Other only
Generous	More to other or Equal	More to other	Self only	Self only or Both

Figure 3. A model process of distributive rule application in an individual, drawing on Valsiner’s (2014) theoretical discussions on cultural psychology.

Hashimoto, Y., & Toda, Y. (2019). Young children’s fairness judgements on the distribution of rewards and responsibilities: Allocation patterns and consistencies across two kinds of distribution. Early Child Development and Care, 189(7), 1051–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1362402

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. Sage Publications.

 Google Scholar