227
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Integrated simulation and control environment for the development and safe start-up of cable driven parallel robots

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 26 Dec 2023, Accepted 24 Apr 2024, Published online: 06 May 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Under-constrained CDPR schematic view.

Figure 1. Under-constrained CDPR schematic view.

Figure 2. Closed-loop kinematics model of CDPR.

Figure 2. Closed-loop kinematics model of CDPR.

Table 1. Geometrical parameters of the CDPR.

Figure 3. Architecture of the proposed environment.

Figure 3. Architecture of the proposed environment.

Figure 4. Under-constrained CDPR model in CoppeliaSim. a) tree of components. (b) 3D view.

Figure 4. Under-constrained CDPR model in CoppeliaSim. a) tree of components. (b) 3D view.

Figure 5. Mechanical and electronics elements of the CDPR prototype.

Figure 5. Mechanical and electronics elements of the CDPR prototype.

Figure 6. Three-dimensional pick & place trajectory for testing.

Figure 6. Three-dimensional pick & place trajectory for testing.

Table 2. Direct kinematic solution of an arbitrary point on the trajectory.

Table 3. Comparison of computing time of direct kinematic methods to obtain a new solution.

Figure 7. Reaction time difference between the position of the simulated and prototype axes with respect to the target position. a) simulated axis 1 and b) prototype axis 1 at slow speed. c) simulated axis 1 and d) prototype axis 1 at high speed.

Figure 7. Reaction time difference between the position of the simulated and prototype axes with respect to the target position. a) simulated axis 1 and b) prototype axis 1 at slow speed. c) simulated axis 1 and d) prototype axis 1 at high speed.

Figure 8. Trajectories of the prototype, simulator, and target at two different speeds. Subfigures (a–c) show trajectories at 100 mm/s, and (d–f) at 500 mm/s, across X-Z, Y-Z, and X-Y planes, respectively.

Figure 8. Trajectories of the prototype, simulator, and target at two different speeds. Subfigures (a–c) show trajectories at 100 mm/s, and (d–f) at 500 mm/s, across X-Z, Y-Z, and X-Y planes, respectively.

Table 4. Absolute error metrics during trajectory execution.

Table 5. Mean relative position error during trajectory execution.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MP4 Video (47.8 MB)