585
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cost-effectiveness analysis of adult pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for pneumococcal disease in Japan

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 546-560 | Received 14 Feb 2024, Accepted 29 Apr 2024, Published online: 09 May 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Model structure.

IPD: invasive pneumococcal disease; NBP: non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia.
Note: Transitions between risk categories were not included in this study.
Figure 1. Model structure.

Table 1. Base-case model inputs.

Table 2. Results of base case in 65-year-old adults and adults at high risk aged 60 to 64 years.

Table 3. Breakdown of health outcomes and costs in base case and scenario analysis 1 in 65-year-old adults and adults at high risk aged 60 to 64 years.

Table 4. Scenario analysis (PCV20 vs PPSV23) with different vaccine target population.

Table 5. Scenario analysis (PCV20 vs PPSV23) in 65-year-old adults and adults at high risk aged 60 to 64 years.

Figure 2. Deterministic sensitivity analysis results: tornado diagram.

INMB: incremental net monetary benefit; NBP: non-bacterial pneumonia; PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal vaccine; PPSV23: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.
For PCV20 cost, a lower value of 11.13% was applied as we assumed the lowest PCV20 cost would be par to PCV13 cost.
Figure 2. Deterministic sensitivity analysis results: tornado diagram.

Figure 3. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results for the cost-effectiveness plane (PCV20 vs PPSV23).

PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal vaccine; PPSV23: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine; QALY: quality-adjusted life year
The red line corresponds to the cost-effectiveness threshold of JPY5,000,000 per QALY gained used in this analysis.
Figure 3. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results for the cost-effectiveness plane (PCV20 vs PPSV23).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (385.9 KB)