Impact of workplace incivility on choice of coping strategies: A mixed method study

Figures & data

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for age, work experience, experienced workplace incivility, and adopted coping strategies.

	Mean	Std. Deviation
Age	34.28	7.12
Total Years of Work Experience	11.89	6.50
Workplace Incivility	24.37	9.81
Avoidant Coping	18.74	5.81
Task Focused Coping	25.76	6.28
Emotion Focused Coping	19.21	6.99

N = 151.

Table 2. Simple regression results of workplace incivility as a predictor of avoidant coping.

Block	Predictor	Workplace Incivility
1	Avoidant Coping	Model Fit	β	t
		R² = .102	.31***	4.11
		F(1, 149) = 16.89***

Note: β = standardized regression coefficient. *** p < .001.

Table 3. Simple regression results of workplace incivility as a predictor of task focused coping.

Block	Predictor	Workplace Incivility
1	Task Focused Coping	Model Fit	β	t
		R² =.000	−0.003	−0.034
		F(1, 149) = .001

Note: β = standardized regression coefficient. p = .973.

Table 4. Simple regression results of workplace incivility as a predictor of emotion focused coping.

Block	Predictor	Workplace incivility
1	Emotion Focused Coping	Model Fit	β	t
		R² = .129	.35***	4.70
		F(1, 149) = 22.09***

Note: β = standardized regression coefficient. *** p < .001.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the first author, [BH]. The data are not publicly available due to containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.