343
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special issue: The New Zealand Society of Animal Production (NZSAP) Annual Conference

Effect of breed and stage of lactation on the solid fat content of milk from cows milked once a day or twice a day

, , , , &
Pages 328-335 | Received 16 Jun 2023, Accepted 31 Oct 2023, Published online: 12 Nov 2023

ABSTRACT

Solid fat content at 10°C (SFC10) is an important parameter of milk fat that influences the spreadability of butter. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of breed and stage of lactation on SFC10 of milk fat from cows milked once a day (OAD) or twice a day (TAD). Milk was collected from 39 Holstein-Friesian (F), 27 Jersey (J), and 34 Holstein-Friesian × Jersey (F × J) cows from a OAD herd and 104 F and 83 F × J cows from a TAD herd in early, mid and late lactation. The SFC10 was predicted using a regression model using milk fatty acid composition. The lower the SFC10, the higher the spreadability of butter. The SFC10 was lower (P < 0.05) for F cows compared with J cows milked OAD. The SFC10 was lower (P < 0.05) for F cows compared with F × J cows milked TAD. The SFC10 was lower in early lactation compared with mid- and late lactation in both milking frequencies. This study revealed that F cow milk and early lactation milk would be suitable for making more easily spreadable butter in OAD and TAD milking. These results could be applicable in the New Zealand dairy industry if consumer preference for more easily spreadable butter increases.

Introduction

Solid fat content is considered an important parameter in the dairy industry as it is a good indicator of the functional properties of milk fat. Solid fat content is the proportion of fat that has crystallized at a given temperature and is generally expressed in the percentage of total fat. The solid fat content of the milk fat is usually measured in the temperature range from 10–20°C, as substantial changes occur in this temperature range (Meagher et al. Citation2007). Solid fat content at 10°C (SFC10) has a relationship with hardness and spreadability, both functional properties (MacGibbon Citation1996). Lower SFC10 of milk fat increases the spreadability of butter, which is the ability to spread the butter, for example on bread.

The majority of the variation in the functional properties of butter can be explained by the variation in fatty acid composition. Among 400 fatty acids detected, 16 fatty acids were present in sufficiently large quantities to affect the physical properties of butter including melting point, spreadability, and solidification temperature (Chen et al. Citation2004). The proportions of C16:0 and C18:1 cis-9 in milk are considered important as they influence the SFC10 of milk fat (MacGibbon Citation1996; Mackle et al. Citation1997). The lower the C16:0/C18:1 ratio in milk higher the spreadability of the butter (Couvreur et al. Citation2006). Milk fatty acid composition is affected by several factors including breed (Soyeurt et al. Citation2006; Sanjayaranj et al. Citation2022a), stages of lactation (Kgwatalala et al. Citation2009; Sanjayaranj et al. Citation2022b), diet (Palmquist et al. Citation1993; Dewhurst et al. Citation2006) and genetic variation (Stoop et al. Citation2008; Lopez-Villalobos et al. Citation2014).

One of the other factors affecting milk fatty acid composition is milking frequency. Dairy farming in New Zealand predominantly involves twice-a-day (TAD) milking. However, recently farmers have adopted once-a-day (OAD) milking for a full season or part of the season. Once-a-day milking reduces the milk volume and modifies the milk composition (Tong et al. Citation2002; Clark et al. Citation2006). Recent studies reported that OAD milking affects the fatty acid composition of milk (Delamaire and Guinard-Flament Citation2006; Sanjayaranj et al. 2022b). Therefore, there is the possibility that OAD milking could affect the SFC10. Previous studies also reported the effect of breed (MacGibbon Citation1996) and stages of lactation (Auldist et al. Citation1998) on SFC10 in cows milked TAD. There have been no studies on the effect of breed and stage of lactation on the SFC10 in OAD milking. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the effect of breed and stage of lactation on SFC10 of milk fat from cows milked OAD and TAD as separate experiments.

Materials and methods

Experiment 1

Experiment 1 was conducted on the No. 1 Dairy farm at Massey University, New Zealand. The No.1 Dairy farm is managed as a low-input system with cows milked OAD. The cows are fed ryegrass (Lolium perenne)/white clover (Trifolium repens) pasture and herb mix crops containing chicory (Cichorium intybus), plantain (Plantago lanceolata), and red clover (Trifolium pratense) with lower supplements. The supplements included maize silage, dried distillers grains, tapioca pellets, grain-based concentrate, and baleage. The stocking rate of the No.1 Dairy was 2.4 cows/ha. Milk samples were collected from the OAD herd containing 39 Holstein-Friesian (F), 27 Jersey (J), and 34 Holstein-Friesian × Jersey (F × J) cows in early, mid, and late lactation. The herd consisted of 1st and 2nd parity cows.

Experiment 2

Experiment 2 was conducted on the No. 4 Dairy farm at Massey University, New Zealand. The No.4 Dairy farm is managed as a high input system with cows milked TAD. The cows are mainly fed ryegrass/white clover pasture with higher supplements. The supplements included maize silage, dried distillers grains, grain-based concentrate, dry roughages, and baleage. The stocking rate of the No.4 Dairy was 2.6 cows/ha. Milk samples were collected from 104 and 83 F × J cows in early, mid-, and late lactation. The herd consisted of 1st and 2nd parity cows.

Sample collection

Morning milk samples were collected from the OAD herd in experiment 1 and morning and afternoon milk samples were collected from the TAD herd in experiment 2. Composite milk samples were collected using Waikato milk flow metres. Milk samples were stored at 0–4°C until analysis which was carried out within two days of sample collection.

Determination of fatty acid composition

The fatty acid composition was analysed using a Milkoscan FT1 (Foss Analytical, Hillerød, Denmark). Calibration equations for individual fatty acids were developed using FTIR calibrator software (Foss Analytical, Hillerød, Denmark) using a data set with mid-infrared spectral data and gas chromatography reference values.

Determination of solid fat content at 10°C

Solid fat content at 10°C was predicted using PROC REG in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), using the fatty acid composition and SFC10 data from the study of MacGibbon (Citation1996). In this study, the fatty acids C4:0 C6:0 C8:0 C10:0 C12:0 C14:0 C16:0 C18:0 C18:1 cis-9 were tested for their prediction for SFC10. A stepwise regression was used to find the good predictors of SFC10. The final multiple regression model was the following: SFC10=2.72×C12:0+3.33×C14:0+0.97×C16:0+1.61×C18:00.82×C18:1cis9

Statistical analysis

A linear model was developed to estimate the effect of breed and stage of lactation for milk fatty acids and SFC10. The least-squares means and standard errors were estimated using a PROC MIXED procedure in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) for each milking frequency separately (different data sets for OAD and TAD farms). yijkm=μ+Bi+Lj+Sk+β1dijkm+Cm+eijkmYijkm is the observation for composition traits and SFC10 for breed group i, lactation number j, stage of lactation k, and cow m.

μ is the population mean.

Bi is the fixed effect of breed i (i = F, F × J, and J in OAD herd and F and F × J in TAD herd).

Lj is the fixed effect of lactation number j (j = 1st and 2nd lactation).

Sk is the fixed effect of stages of lactation k (k = early, mid, and late).

β1 is the regression coefficient associated with the linear effect of deviation from the median calving date (d) of cow m.

Cm is the random effect of cow m (m = 1, 2, … 100 in OAD herd and 1, 2, … 187 in TAD herd) assumed with mean zero and variance σc2.

eijkm is the residual random error assumed with mean zero and variance σe2.

Results

Descriptive statistics of milk fatty acids and SFC10 for cows milked OAD (experiment 1) and TAD (experiment 2) are presented in .

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of milk fatty acids and solid fat content at 10°C (SFC10) of cows milked once a day (experiment 1Table Footnote) and twice a day (experiment 2Table Footnote) during the 2020–2021 production season.

shows the least squares means and standard errors for milk fatty acids and SFC10 in F, F × J, and J cows milked OAD (experiment 1).

Table 2. Least squares means and standard errors of fatty acids and solid fat content at 10°C (SFC10) of milk from Holstein-Friesian, Holstein-Friesian × Jersey and Jersey cows milked once a day (experiment 1Table Footnote) in the 2020–2021 production season.

The only fatty acid that showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) between breeds was C18:0 in OAD milking frequency. The proportion of C18:0 was lower in F cows compared with J cows. Similarly, the SFC10 was lower in F cows compared with J cows milked OAD.

shows the least squares means and standard errors for milk fatty acids and SFC10 in F and F × J cows milked TAD (experiment 2). The proportion of C18:0 was lower in F cows compared with F × J cows. The SFC10 was lower in F cows compared with F × J cows milked TAD.

Table 3. Least squares means and standard errors of fatty acids and solid fat content at 10°C (SFC10) of milk from Holstein-Friesian and Holstein-Friesian × Jersey cows milked twice a day (experiment 2Table Footnote) in the 2020–2021 production season.

shows the proportions of C16:0, C18:0, C18:1 cis-9 and SFC10 in early, mid- and late lactation in cows milked OAD (experiment 1) and cows milked TAD (experiment 2). In cows milked OAD, the proportions of C16:0 and C18:0 were lower and the proportion of C18:1 cis-9 was higher in early lactation compared with mid- and late lactation. The SFC10 was lower in early lactation compared with mid- and late lactation.

Figure 1. Proportions of C16:0, C18:0, C18:1 cis-9 and solid fat content at 10°C (SFC10) in cows milked once a day (experiment 1) and twice a day (experiment 2) during the production season 2020–2021. The farm was managed as a low-input system; The farm was managed as a high-input system. EL = early lactation (<90 days); ML = mid lactation (90–180 days); LL = late lactation (>180 days). The vertical bars show the standard errors.

Figure 1. Proportions of C16:0, C18:0, C18:1 cis-9 and solid fat content at 10°C (SFC10) in cows milked once a day (experiment 1†) and twice a day (experiment 2‡) during the production season 2020–2021. † The farm was managed as a low-input system; ‡ The farm was managed as a high-input system. EL = early lactation (<90 days); ML = mid lactation (90–180 days); LL = late lactation (>180 days). The vertical bars show the standard errors.

Similar trends were reported for the fatty acid in cows milked TAD except for the proportions of C18:0. The proportion of C18:0 was higher in early lactation compared with mid- and late lactation. However, the SFC10 was lower in early lactation.

Discussion

In this study, the analysis was carried out separately and the results were interpreted separately for each milking frequency as OAD and TAD cows were fed mainly pasture with different levels of supplements. The SFC10 of milk fat is generally used to measure the spreadability of butter. A significant proportion of variation in SFC10 is explained by breed (MacGibbon Citation1996). In experiment 1, the lower SFC10 in F cows milked OAD compared with J cows was in agreement with MacGibbon (Citation1996). Lower SFC10 in F cows could be due to a lower proportion of C18:0 compared with J cows milked OAD. MacGibbon (Citation1996) reported that higher melting point long-chain saturated fatty acids contribute to higher SFC10. Although, the proportions of C16:0, and C18:1 cis-9 were not significantly different between breeds the combination of these fatty acids could also affect the SFC10. MacGibbon (Citation1996) reported that cows producing higher fat content tend to produce higher SFC10. In experiment 1, J cows milked OAD produced higher fat content compared with F cows. Overall, the lower SFC10 in F cows could be due to the lower proportion of C18:0 and lower fat content compared with J cows. Lower SFC10 would result in F cows producing more easily spreadable butter compared with J cows when milked OAD.

In experiment 2, lower SFC10 in F cows could be due to a lower proportion of C18:0 and lower fat content compared with F × J cows milked TAD. Holstein-Friesian cows would be expected to produce more easily spreadable butter compared with F × J cows.

The SFC10 was associated with milk fatty acid composition. Solid fat content at 10°C was positively correlated with fatty acids C8:0 – C14:0 (MacGibbon Citation1996) and C16:0 (Mackle et al. Citation1997) and negatively associated with C18:1 and C18:2 fatty acids (MacGibbon Citation1996; Mackle et al. Citation1997). Similarly, Bobe et al. (Citation2003) and Couvreur et al. (Citation2006) reported that increasing unsaturated fatty acids in the diet decreased the SFC10 in butter fat. In general, milk containing higher unsaturated fatty acids and lower long-chain saturated fatty acids tends to reduce the SFC10 and therefore increase the spreadability of butter. Auldist et al. (Citation2004) reported J cows had higher proportions of long-chain saturated fatty acids and lower proportions of long-chain unsaturated fatty acids compared with F cows. This could be a reason that J cows showed higher SFC10 in this study and this was also explained by the proportion of higher C18:0 in J cows compared with F cows milked OAD. Similar results were reported for F × J cows compared with F cows milked TAD. Shukla et al. (Citation1994) reported that high melting point milk fat can be potentially used in bakery, chocolate, and confectionary industries where harder fat is desirable. Jersey milk could be used in these industries. In both milking frequencies, F cows produced milk with lower SFC10, which could be useful in producing more easily spreadable butter.

The SFC10 is also affected by stages of lactation. In both experiments, butter produced from early lactation milk is expected to be more easily spreadable due to lower SFC10 in early lactation compared with mid- and late lactation. This is in agreement with Auldist et al. (Citation1998) and Thomson and Van Der Poel (Citation2000) that the SFC10 was lower in early lactation. In experiment 1, the lower SFC10 in early lactation in cows milked OAD may be due to lower proportions of C16:0 and C18:0 and higher proportion of C18:1 cis-9 in early lactation. In experiment 2, the lower SFC10 in early lactation in cows milked TAD could be due to lower proportion of C16:0 and higher proportion of C18: 1 cis-9 in early lactation. The higher proportion of C18:0 in early lactation in cows milked TAD could increase the SFC10 but this effect may be reduce due to lower proportions of C16:0 and higher proportion of C18:1 cis-9. These fatty acids occur in higher proportions in milk compared with C18:0. Overall, in both miking frequencies, milk from early lactation would be more suitable for making more easily spreadable butter.

In this study, the effect of the stage of lactation on SFC10 and milk fatty acids was significant for cows milked OAD and TAD. However, the SFC10 is also influenced by the seasons of the year. MacGibbon (Citation1996), Auldist et al. (Citation1998), and Meagher et al. (Citation2007) reported that the effect of the season of the year on SFC10 was more prominent than the effect of stages of lactation. In New Zealand, stages of lactation are synchronised with the season and pasture growth. Therefore, finding the actual effect of stages of lactation is complicated.

In summary, in OAD milking, F cows would more suitable for producing more easily spreadable butter compared with J cows and early lactation milk is expected to be producing more easily spreadable butter compared with mid- and late lactation. In TAD milking, F cows would more suitable for producing more easily spreadable butter compared with F × J cows and early lactation milk is expected to produce more easily spreadable butter compared with mid- and late lactation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • Auldist MJ, Johnston KA, White NJ, Fitzsimons WP, Boland MJ. 2004. A comparison of the composition, coagulation characteristics and cheesemaking capacity of milk from Friesian and Jersey dairy cows. The Journal of Dairy Research. 71:51–57. doi:10.1017/S0022029903006575.
  • Auldist MJ, Walsh BJ, Thomson NA. 1998. Seasonal and lactational influences on bovine milk composition in New Zealand. Journal of Dairy Research. 65:401–411. doi:10.1017/S0022029998002970.
  • Bobe G, Hammond EG, Freeman AE, Lindberg GL, Beitz DC. 2003. Texture of butter from cows with different milk fatty acid compositions. Journal of Dairy Science. 86:3122–3127. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73913-7.
  • Chen S, Bobe G, Zimmerman S, Hammond EG, Luhman CM, Boylston TD, Freeman AE, Deitz DC. 2004. Physical and sensory properties of dairy products from cows with various milk fatty acid compositions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 52:3422–3428. doi:10.1021/jf035193z.
  • Clark DA, Phyn CVC, Tong MJ, Collis SJ, Dalley DE. 2006. A systems comparison of once-versus twice daily milking of pastured dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:1854–1862. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72254-8.
  • Couvreur S, Hurtaud C, Lopez C, Delaby L, Peyraud JL. 2006. The linear relationship between the proportion of fresh grass in the cow diet, milk fatty acid composition, and butter properties. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:1956–1969. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72263-9.
  • Delamaire E, Guinard-Flament J. 2006. Increasing milking intervals decreases the mammary blood flow and mammary uptake of nutrients in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:3439–3446. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72381-5.
  • Dewhurst RJ, Shingfield KJ, Lee MR, Scollan ND. 2006. Increasing the concentrations of beneficial polyunsaturated fatty acids in milk produced by dairy cows in high-forage systems. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 131:168–206. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.04.016.
  • Kgwatalala PM, Ibeagha-Awemu EM, Mustafa AF, Zhao X. 2009. Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 genotype and stage of lactation influences milk fatty acid composition of Canadian Holstein cows. Animal Genetics. 40:609–615. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01887.x.
  • Lopez-Villalobos N, Spelman RJ, Melis J, Davis SR, Berry SD, Lehnert K, Holroyd SE, MacGibbon AK, Snell RG. 2014. Estimation of genetic and crossbreeding parameters of fatty acid concentrations in milk fat predicted by mid-infrared spectroscopy in New Zealand dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Research. 81:340–349. doi:10.1017/S0022029914000272.
  • MacGibbon AK. 1996. Herd-to-herd variations in the properties of milkfat. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 56:224–227.
  • Mackle TR, Petch SF, Bryant AM, Auldist MJ, Henderson HV, MacGibbon AKH. 1997. Variation in the characteristics of milkfat from pasture-fed dairy cows during late spring and the effects of grain supplementation. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 40:349–359. doi:10.1080/00288233.1997.9513254.
  • Meagher LP, Holroyd SE, Illingworth D, Van De Ven F, Lane S. 2007. At-Line Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for prediction of the solid fat content of milk fat from New Zealand butter. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 55:2791–2796. doi:10.1021/jf063215m.
  • Palmquist DL, Beaulieu AD, Barbano DM. 1993. Feed and animal factors influencing milk fat composition. Journal of Dairy Science. 76:1753–1771. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77508-6.
  • Sanjayaranj I, Lopez-Villalobos N, Blair HT, Janssen PWM, Holroyd SE, MacGibbon AKH. 2022a. Effect of breed on the fatty acid composition of milk from dairy cows milked once and twice a day in different stages of lactation. Dairy. 3:608–621. doi:10.3390/dairy3030043.
  • Sanjayaranj I, Lopez-Villalobos N, Blair HT, Janssen PWM, Holroyd SE, MacGibbon AKH. 2022b. Fatty acid composition of dairy milk: a case study comparing once- and twice-a-day milking of pasture-fed cows at different stages of lactation. Dairy. 3:174–189. doi:10.3390/dairy3010014.
  • Shukla A, Bhaskar AR, Rizvi SSH, Mulvaney SJ. 1994. Physicochemical and rheological properties of butter made from super critically fractionated milk fat. Journal of Dairy Science. 77:45–54. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76927-7.
  • Soyeurt H, Dardenne P, Gillon A, Croquet C, Vanderick S, Mayeres P, Bertozzi C, Gengler N. 2006. Variation in fatty acid contents of milk and milk fat within and across breeds. Journal of Dairy Science. 89:4858–4865. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72534-6.
  • Stoop WM, Van Arendonk JA, Heck JM, Van Valenberg HJ, Bovenhuis H. 2008. Genetic parameters for major milk fatty acids and milk production traits of Dutch Holstein-Friesians. Journal of Dairy Science. 91:385–394. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0181.
  • Thomson NA, Van Der Poel W. 2000. Seasonal variation of the fatty acid composition of milkfat from Friesian cows grazing pasture. InProceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 60:314–317.
  • Tong MJ, Clark DA, Cooper CV. 2002. Once-a-day milking: possible and profitable? Proceeding of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 64:33–37. doi:10.33584/jnzg.2002.64.2470.