Abstract
In this paper, we investigate primeness of groupoid graded rings. We provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for primeness of a nearly-epsilon strongly groupoid graded ring. Furthermore, we apply our main result to get a characterization of prime partial skew groupoid rings, and in particular of prime groupoid rings, thereby generalizing a classical result by Connell and partially generalizing recent results by Steinberg.
1 Introduction
Throughout this paper, all rings are assumed to be associative but not necessarily unital. Recall that a ring S is said to be prime if there are no nonzero ideals I, J of S such that
In 1963, Connell [Citation7, Theorem 8] gave a characterization of prime group rings. Indeed, given a unital ring A and a group G, the corresponding group ring is prime if, and only if, A is prime and G has no nontrivial finite normal subgroup.
Given a group G, recall that a ring S is said to be G-graded if there is a collection of additive subgroups of S such that , and , for all . If, in addition, , for all , then S is said to be strongly G-graded. The class of unital strongly G-graded rings includes for instance all group rings, all twisted group rings, and all G-crossed products.
In 1984, Passman [Citation22, Theorem 1.3] generalized Connell’s result by giving a characterization of prime unital strongly group graded rings. In recent years, various generalizations of strongly group graded rings have appeared in the literature. In [Citation16], so-called nearly epsilon-strongly group graded rings were introduced. That class of rings contains for instance all unital strongly group graded rings, all epsilon-strongly group graded rings, all Leavitt path algebras, and all unital partial crossed products (see [Citation16, Citation17]). In [Citation9], a characterization of prime nearly epsilon-strongly group graded rings was established, thereby generalizing Passman’s result to a non-unital and non-strong setting.
In this paper, we turn our focus to rings graded by groupoids. Let G be a groupoid. Recall that a ring S is said to be G-graded if there is a collection of additive subgroups of S such that , and whenever are composable, and otherwise. Groupoid rings, groupoid crossed products, and partial skew groupoid rings are examples of rings that, by construction, are naturally graded by groupoids (see e.g. [Citation1, Citation2, Citation4, Citation5, Citation20]). Partial skew groupoid rings play a key role in the theory of partial Galois extensions for partial groupoid actions (see e.g., [Citation3, Theorem 5.3]) and, in particular, in the Galois theory of weak Hopf algebra actions on algebras (see [Citation6]). Some crossed product algebras defined by separable extensions are not, in a natural way, graded by groups, but instead by groupoids (see e.g. [Citation11, Citation12]). Another concrete example of when it can be beneficial to make use of a groupoid grading instead of just a group grading is in the study of Leavitt path algebras. There, one may utilize the canonical grading by the so-called free path groupoid which is finer, and encodes more of the structure, than the coarser canonical -grading (see [Citation8]).
Suppose that G is a groupoid and that S is a G-graded ring. Following [Citation10], we shall say that S is nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded if, for each is an s-unital ring and . Our main result provides a characterization of prime nearly epsilon-strongly groupoid graded rings.
Theorem 1.1.
Let G be a groupoid, let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring, and let . The following statements are equivalent:
S is prime;
is G-prime, and for every is prime;
is G-prime, and for some is prime;
S is graded prime, and for every is prime;
S is graded prime, and for some is prime;
For every e is a support-hub, and is prime;
For some e is a support-hub, and is prime.
Here denotes the isotropy group of an element For more details about the statements in the above theorem, see e.g. Definitions 3.17 and 3.21.
We point out that our main result reduces the primeness investigation for a groupoid graded ring to the group case. Indeed, is a nearly epsilon-strongly group graded ring (cf. [Citation16]). Hence, the main result of [Citation9] can be used to decide whether it is prime.
Here is an outline of this paper. In Section 2, based on [Citation15, Citation19, Citation25], we recall some basic definitions and properties about groupoids, groupoid graded rings, and s-unital rings that will be used throughout the paper. In Section 3, we record some basic properties of nearly epsilon-strongly groupoid graded rings. Inspired by [Citation9], for such a ring S, we establish a relationship between the G-invariant ideals of and the G-graded ideals of S (see Theorem 3.16). Moreover, we provide necessary conditions for graded primeness of S (see Section 3.3) and establish our main result which is a characterization of prime nearly epsilon-strongly groupoid graded rings (see Theorem 1.1). Finally, in Section 4, we apply our results to partial skew groupoid rings, skew groupoid rings, and groupoid rings. In particular, we give a characterization of prime partial skew groupoid rings associated with groupoid partial actions of group-type [Citation4, Citation5] (see Theorem 4.15). Using that every global action of a connected groupoid is of group-type, we get a characterization of prime skew groupoid rings of connected groupoids (see Theorem 4.19). Furthermore, we establish a generalization of Connell’s classical result, by providing a characterization of prime groupoid rings (see Theorem 4.26).
2 Preliminaries
In this section, we recall some notions and basic notation regarding groupoids and graded rings.
2.1 Groupoids
By a groupoid, we shall mean a small category G in which every morphism is invertible. Each object of G will be identified with its corresponding identity morphism, allowing us to view G0, the set of objects of G, as a subset of the set of morphisms of G. The set of morphisms of G will simply be denoted by G. This means that .
The range and source maps , indicate the range (codomain) respectively source (domain) of each morphism of G. By abuse of notation, the set of composable pairs of G is denoted by . For each we denote the corresponding isotropy group by
Definition 2.1.
Let G be a groupoid.
G is said to be connected, if for every pair , there exists such that s(g) = e and r(g) = f.
A nonempty subset H of G is said to be a subgroupoid of G, if and whenever and .
2.2 Groupoid graded rings
Definition 2.2.
Let G be a groupoid. A ring S is said to be G-graded (or graded by G) if there is a collection of additive subgroups of S such that , and , if , and , otherwise.
Remark 2.3.
Suppose that G is a groupoid and that S is a G-graded ring.
If H is a subgroupoid of G, then is an H-graded subring of S. In particular, note that and are subrings of S for every .
For any element , with , we define .
An ideal I of S is said to be a graded ideal (or G-graded ideal) if .
The next lemma generalizes [Citation19, Lemma 2.4]. For the convenience of the reader, we include a proof.
Lemma 2.4.
Let G be a groupoid and let S be a G-graded ring. Suppose that H is a subgroupoid of G. Define by The following assertions hold:
The map is additive.
If and , then and .
Proof.
(i) This is clear.
(ii) Take and . Put . Clearly, and . If and , then either the composition gh does not exist or it belongs to . Thus, . Hence, Analogously, one may show that . □
2.3 s-unital rings
We briefly recall the definitions of s-unital modules and rings as well as some key properties.
Definition 2.5
([Citation15, cf. Definition 4]). Let R be a ring and let M be a left (resp. right) R-module. We say that M is s-unital if (resp. ) for every . If M is an R-bimodule, then we say that M is s-unital if it is s-unital both as a left R-module and as a right R-module. The ring R is said to be left s-unital (resp. right s-unital) if it is left (resp. right) s-unital as a left (resp. right) module over itself. The ring R is said to be s-unital if it is s-unital as a bimodule over itself.
The following results are due to Tominaga [Citation25]. For the proofs, we refer the reader to [Citation15, Propositions 2.8 and 2.10].
Proposition 2.6.
Let R be a ring and let M be a left (resp. right) R-module. Then M is left (resp. right) s-unital if, and only if, for all and all there is some such that (resp. ) for every .
Proposition 2.7.
Let R be a ring and let M be an R-bimodule. Then M is s-unital if, and only if, for all and all there is some such that for every .
Remark 2.8.
The element a, in Proposition 2.7, is commonly referred to as an s-unit for the set .
3 Groupoid graded rings
Throughout this section, unless stated otherwise, G denotes an arbitrary groupoid.
3.1 Nearly epsilon-strongly groupoid graded rings
In this section, we will recall the notion of a nearly epsilon-strongly groupoid graded ring and record some of its basic properties.
Definition 3.1
([Citation10, Definition 3]). Let S be a G-graded ring. We say that S is nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded if, for each is an s-unital ring and .
Remark 3.2.
The above definition simultaneously generalizes [Citation16, Definition 3.3] and [Citation18, Definition 34].
The following characterization of a nearly epsilon-strongly groupoid graded ring appeared in [Citation10, Proposition 15] without a proof. For the convenience of the reader, we provide it here.
Proposition 3.3.
Let S be a G-graded ring. The following statements are equivalent:
S is nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded;
For all and there exist and such that
Proof.
Suppose that (i) holds. Let and We may write for some , and . Notice that and for every By assumption, and are s-unital and hence, by Proposition 2.6, there exist and such that and for every Thus, This shows that (ii) holds.
Conversely, suppose that (ii) holds. Let Note that, by assumption, Sg is s-unital as a left -module and is s-unital as a right -module. Let We may write for some and . By s-unitality of the left -module Sg, and Proposition 2.6, there is some such that for every Similarly, there is some such that for every Hence, and . This shows that is s-unital. Note that Using that Sg is s-unital as a left -module we get that . Thus, . This shows that (i) holds. □
Corollary 3.4.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring and let a be a nonzero element of S. If , then there are elements such that and .
The following result generalizes [Citation9, Proposition 2.13] from the group setting.
Proposition 3.5.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. The following assertions hold:
Se is an s-unital ring, for every .
, for every
S is s-unital and is an s-unital subring of S.
Suppose that H is a subgroupoid of G. Then is a nearly epsilon-strongly H-graded ring.
is an s-unital ring, for every
The set
is a subgroupoid of G.
Proof.
Take . By assumption, Therefore, and hence .
Let , with Take . By Proposition 3.3, there exist and such that The set is finite, because is finite. For every , by (i), Sf is s-unital, and we let be an s-unit for the finite set Define We get that
Similarly, we define the finite set For every by (i), we let be an s-unit for the finite set Define We get that
It follows immediately from (ii).
It follows immediately from Remark 2.3 and the fact that .
Take . Clearly, the isotropy group is a subgroupoid of G. By (iv) and (iii) we get that is s-unital.
Clearly, whenever . Suppose that and . Then and Therefore, This shows that is a subgroupoid of G.
Take such that . We claim that . If we assume that the claim holds, then clearly Now we show the claim. Let be nonzero. By Proposition 3.3, there are and such that In particular, and □
Remark 3.6.
(a) Note that (vi) above holds for any G-graded ring. For (vii), however, the nearly epsilon-strongness of the G-grading is used.
(b) Suppose that S is a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. By Proposition 3.5(vii), whenever . The converse, however, need not hold (see e.g., Example 4.22).
Example 3.7.
Let be a groupoid with and depicted as follows:
Let be the ring of 3 × 3 matrices over and let denote the standard matrix units. We define:
Notice that It is not difficult to see that the ring is nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded.
3.2 Invariance in groupoid graded rings
Inspired by [Citation9, Sections 3–4], we shall now examine the relationship between G-graded ideals of a G-graded ring S and G-invariant ideals of the subring Throughout this section, S denotes an arbitrary G-graded ring.
Definition 3.8
([Citation9, Definitions 3.1 and 3.3]). Let S be a G-graded ring.
For any and any subset I of S, we write
Let H be a subgroupoid of G and let I be a subset of S. Then, I is called H-invariant if for every
Remark 3.9.
Note that if and then
Lemma 3.10.
If and J is an ideal of then Jg is an ideal of
Proof.
Let and let J be an ideal of . Notice that Jg is an additive subgroup of Moreover, Analogously, □
Proposition 3.11.
Suppose that J is an ideal of Then SJS is a G-graded ideal of S.
Proof.
It is clear that SJS is an ideal of S and that Now, we show the reversed inclusion. Take and If then Otherwise, , and then Thus, □
Lemma 3.12.
Suppose that is s-unital and that J is an ideal of Then J is G-invariant if, and only if,
Proof.
We first show the “only if” statement. Suppose that J is G-invariant. For each we have
Let . By Proposition 3.11, SJS is G-graded and we notice that . Thus, . By assumption, is s-unital and . Hence,
Now we show the “if” statement. Suppose that Take and notice that Thus, J is G-invariant. □
Lemma 3.13.
If I is a G-graded ideal of S, then is a G-invariant ideal of
Proof.
Let I be a G-graded ideal of S. Clearly, is an ideal of Take Notice that Furthermore, if then Therefore, □
Lemma 3.14.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. If I is a G-graded ideal of S, then
Proof.
Let I be a G-graded ideal of S. By Proposition 3.5, S is s-unital and hence Thus, Analogously,
We claim that Take and By Proposition 3.3, there is some such that Then, for some and Notice that for every Hence, Using that I is G-graded, we get that Similarly, Thus, and □
Corollary 3.15.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. If J is a G-invariant ideal of then
Proof.
Let J be a G-invariant ideal of By Proposition 3.11, SJS is a G-graded ideal of S, and, by Lemma 3.14, Thus, by Proposition 3.5(iii) and Lemma 3.12, □
By Lemmas 3.13 and 3.11, the following maps are well defined:
The following theorem generalizes [Citation9, Theorem 4.7] and [Citation2, Theorem 3.12].
Theorem 3.16.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. The map defines a bijection between the set of G-graded ideals of S and the set of G-invariant ideals of The inverse of is given by
Proof.
Let I be a G-graded ideal of S. Lemma 3.14 implies that Let J be a G-invariant ideal of S. Notice that, by Proposition 3.5(iii) and Lemma 3.12, □
3.3 Graded primeness of groupoid graded rings
In this section, we identify necessary and sufficient conditions for graded primeness of a groupoid graded ring.
Definition 3.17.
Let S be a G-graded ring.
is said to be G-prime if there are no nonzero G-invariant ideals I, J of such that .
S is said to be graded prime if there are no nonzero G-graded ideals I, J of S such that .
The following result generalizes [Citation2, Proposition 3.29].
Theorem 3.18.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. Then S is graded prime if, and only if, is G-prime.
Proof.
We first show the “if” statement. Suppose that is G-prime and let I1, I2 be nonzero G-graded ideals of S. By Lemma 3.13 and Corollary 3.4, and are nonzero G-invariant ideals of Then
Now, we show the “only if” statement. Suppose that S is graded prime and let J1, J2 be nonzero G-invariant ideals of By Proposition 3.5(iii) and Proposition 3.11, and are nonzero G-graded ideals of S. By Corollary 3.15 and our assumption, Thus, . □
Now, we determine some necessary conditions for graded primeness of a groupoid graded ring.
Lemma 3.19.
Let S be a G-graded ring. Then SbtS is a G-graded ideal of S for all and
Proof.
Take and . Clearly, is an ideal of S. Notice that Now, take , and If or then Otherwise, we have that
This shows that □
Lemma 3.20.
Let S be a G-graded ring which is s-unital. Suppose that S is graded prime. Let and be nonzero elements, for some . Then there is some and such that is nonzero.
Proof.
We prove the contrapositive statement. Suppose that for all and Consider the sets and which, by Lemma 3.19 and the s-unitality of S, are both nonzero G-graded ideals of S. By assumption, we have This shows that S is not graded prime. □
Definition 3.21.
Let S be a G-graded ring. An element (see Proposition 3.5(vi)) is said to be a support-hub if for every nonzero , with , there are such that r(k) = e, and and are both nonzero.
Remark 3.22.
Let S be a G-graded ring.
Suppose that is a support-hub and that is nonzero, for some . Notice that there are as in the following diagram.
Notice that, if S is a ring which is nearly epsilon-strongly graded by a group G, then the identity element e of G is always a support-hub.
Proposition 3.23.
Let S be a G-graded ring which is s-unital. If S is graded prime, then every is a support-hub.
Proof.
We prove the contrapositive statement. Suppose that there is some which is not a support-hub. Then there are and a nonzero element , such that for every such that we have that or for every such that we have that Let ae be a nonzero element of Using Lemma 3.19 and the fact that S is s-unital, and are nonzero G-graded ideals of S.
Notice that if for every such that we have that then Moreover, if for every such that we have that then Therefore, S is not graded prime. □
Proposition 3.24.
Let S be a G-graded ring which is s-unital. The following assertions hold:
If G is a connected groupoid, then is a connected subgroupoid of G.
If there is a support-hub in , then is a connected subgroupoid of G.
If S is graded prime, then is a connected subgroupoid of G.
Proof.
Suppose that G is connected. Take By assumption, there is such that s(g) = e and Since Se and Sf are nonzero, we must have , and hence is connected.
Suppose that is a support-hub. Take By the definition of there are nonzero elements and Since e is a support-hub, there is some such that r(k) = e and In particular, Using again that e is a support-hub, there is some such that s(h) = e and Hence, Define and note that and
It follows from Proposition 3.23 and (ii). □
3.4 Primeness of groupoid graded rings
In this section, we will provide necessary and sufficient conditions for primeness of a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. Furthermore, we will extend [Citation9, Theorem 1.3] to the context of groupoid graded rings.
Proposition 3.25.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. If S is prime, then is prime for every
Proof.
We prove the contrapositive statement. Let Suppose that I and J are nonzero ideals of such that . By Proposition 3.5(iii), S is s-unital and hence and are nonzero ideals of S. Clearly, We claim that If we assume that the claim holds, then it follows that , and we are done. Now we show the claim. Take and . Let If or , then Otherwise, and then, since I and J are ideals of , we get that Thus, . □
Remark 3.26.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring.
By Propositions 3.25 and 3.24(iii), if S is prime, then is prime for every and is connected. The converse, however, need not hold as shown by Example 4.22.
Recall that, by Lemma 2.4, is defined by for every .
The next result partially generalizes [Citation9, Lemma 2.19].
Lemma 3.27.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring and let I be a nonzero ideal of S. If is a support-hub, then is a nonzero ideal of
Proof.
Suppose that is a support-hub. By Lemma 2.4, is an ideal of We claim that Let be an element where all the homogeneous coefficients are nonzero and the are distinct. By Corollary 3.4, there is some nonzero such that is nonzero and contained in .
Notice that is nonzero and contained in I. Thus, without loss of generality, we may assume that . Since e is a support-hub, there is an element such that r(k) = e and is nonzero. In particular, there is an element such that is nonzero. Using again that e is a support-hub, there is an element such that s(h) = e and is nonzero. Therefore, there is an element such that is nonzero. Hence, and
Notice that if, and only if, Thus, □
Theorem 3.28.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. If there is some such that e is a support-hub and is prime, then S is prime.
Proof.
Suppose that is a support-hub and that is prime. Let I and J be nonzero ideals of S. By Lemma 3.27, and are nonzero ideals of and hence, by assumption,
We claim that Let and consider the finite set If , then . Now, suppose that and take . Using that there are , and such that
By Proposition 2.6, using that Se is s-unital, there is some such that for all and all Thus, for all and
Using a similar argument, there is some such that for every such that s(t) = e. Therefore,
Analogously, Thus, and S is prime. □
Remark 3.29.
The assumption on the existence of a support-hub in Theorem 3.28 cannot be dropped. Indeed, consider the groupoid and the groupoid ring . Then and . Furthermore, and are both prime. Nevertheless, S is not prime.
The next example shows that the existence of a support-hub in a connected grading groupoid is not enough to guarantee (graded) primeness of the graded ring.
Example 3.30.
Let be a groupoid with and depicted as follows:
Define S as the ring of matrices over of the form
Denote by the standard matrix units and define: and otherwise. It is not difficult to verify that this G-grading is nearly epsilon-strong. Notice that and that is a support-hub. However, observe that and are nonzero elements and that there is no element such that and Therefore, by Lemma 3.20, S is not graded prime.
Now, we prove our main result.
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
It follows from Proposition 3.25 and by the definition of primeness that (i) (iv) (v). By Proposition 3.5(iii), S is s-unital and Proposition 3.23 implies (iv) (vi) (vii) and (v) (vii). By Theorem 3.28, (vii) (i). Finally, note that by Theorem 3.18, (ii) is equivalent to (iv), and (iii) is equivalent to (v). □
Remark 3.31.
In [Citation14], Munn investigates primeness of rings graded by inverse semigroups. He shows (see [Citation14, Theorem 4.1]) that if S is a so-called 0-bisimple inverse semigroup, R is a faithful restricted S-graded ring, and RG is prime for some nonzero maximal subgroup G of S, then R is prime. We point out that Munn’s theorem can potentially be used to prove e.g. (vi) (i) in Theorem 1.1. Indeed, we may associate a natural inverse semigroup with the groupoid G and view any G-graded ring as an S(G)-graded ring (see e.g., [Citation10, Section 4.3]). It is easy to come up with examples of prime nearly-epsilon strongly G-graded rings such that the corresponding S(G)-gradings fail to satisfy the requirements in Munn’s theorem. However, given a prime nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring R, it is not clear to the authors whether one can always find a subgroupoid H of G, contained in , such that S(H) and its grading on R do in fact satisfy the requirements in Munn’s theorem.
We recall that Passman [Citation22] provided a characterization of prime unital strongly group graded rings. That result was generalized in [Citation9, Theorem 1.3] to nearly epsilon-strongly group graded rings.
Theorem 3.32
([Citation9, Theorem 1.3]). Let G be a group and let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. The following statements are equivalent:
S is not prime;
There exist:
subgroups ,
an H-invariant ideal I of Se such that for all and
nonzero ideals of SN such that and
There exist:
subgroups with N finite,
an H-invariant ideal I of Se such that for all and
nonzero ideals of SN such that and
There exist:
subgroups with N finite,
an H-invariant ideal I of Se such that for all and
nonzero H-invariant ideals of SN such that and
There exist:
subgroups with N finite,
an H-invariant ideal I of Se such that for all and
nonzero H/N-invariant ideals of SN such that and
Remark 3.33.
Note that, in Theorem 1.1, is nearly epsilon-strongly graded by the group . Hence, one can use Theorem 3.32 to decide whether is prime.
The following Theorem generalizes [Citation9, Theorem 1.4].
Theorem 3.34.
Let S be a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring. Suppose that there is some such that is torsion-free. Then S is prime if, and only if, Se is -prime and is G-prime.
Proof.
It follows from Theorem 1.1 and [Citation9, Theorem 1.4]. □
4 Applications to partial skew groupoid rings
In this section, we will apply our main results on primeness for nearly epsilon-strongly groupoid graded rings to partial skew groupoid rings, (global) skew groupoid rings, and groupoid rings. In particular, we will characterize prime partial skew groupoid rings induced by partial actions of group-type (cf. [Citation4]). Furthermore, we will generalize [Citation9, Theorem 12.4] and [Citation9, Theorem 13.7].
Throughout this section, unless stated otherwise, G denotes an arbitrary groupoid and A denotes an arbitrary ring.
4.1 Partial skew groupoid rings
Definition 4.1.
A partial action of a groupoid G on a ring A is a family of pairs satisfying:
For each is an ideal of A, Ag is an ideal of , and is a ring isomorphism,
, for every ,
, whenever ,
, for all and .
Definition 4.2.
Given a partial action σ of a groupoid G on a ring A one may define the partial skew groupoid ring as the set of all formal sums of the form , where is zero for all but finitely many , and with addition defined point-wise and multiplication given by
Remark 4.3.
(a) Throughout this section, unless stated otherwise, will assume that is an arbitrary partial action of G on A, that Ag is an s-unital ring, for every , and that . As a consequence, will always be an associative ring (see [Citation2, Remark 2.7 (ii)]), and there will exist a ring isomorphism (cf. [Citation2, Lemma 3.6 (i)]) defined by (1) (1)
(b) Under the above assumptions, by [Citation2, Lemma 3.2], Ag is an ideal of A, for every
(c) It is readily verified that any partial skew groupoid ring carries a natural G-grading defined by letting , for every .
The following result generalizes [Citation9, Proposition 13.1].
Proposition 4.4.
The partial skew groupoid ring is a nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded ring.
Proof.
Let . Using that is s-unital, and hence idempotent, we get that
Now, using that Ag is s-unital we get that is s-unital, and that Ag is idempotent. Hence,
This shows that is nearly epsilon-strongly G-graded. □
Remark 4.5.
By Propositions 3.5 and 4.4, the partial skew groupoid ring is s-unital.
Definition 4.6.
Let G be a groupoid, let A be a ring and let be a partial action of G on A.
Let H be a subgroupoid of G. An ideal I of A is said to be H-invariant if for every .
A is said to be G-prime if there are no nonzero G-invariant ideals I, J of A such that .
The next result generalizes [Citation9, Remark 13.4] from the group setting.
Proposition 4.7.
Let I be an ideal of A. Then I is G-invariant in the sense of Definition 4.6 if, and only if, is a G-invariant ideal of in the sense of Definition 3.8. In particular, A is G-prime if, and only if, is G-prime.
Proof.
Suppose that I is an ideal of A. Let By Remark 4.3(b) and the s-unitality of Ag, we get that and . Furthermore, Notice that . We get that
Therefore,
□
Remark 4.8.
Recall that, with the natural G-grading on , an element is a support-hub if for every nonzero element , with , there are such that r(k) = e and both and are nonzero.
For , denote by the partial action of the isotropy group on the ring Ae, obtained by restricting σ. The associated partial skew group ring is denoted by .
Theorem 4.9.
Let be a partial action of G on A such that Ag is s-unital for every and . Then, the following statements are equivalent:
The partial skew groupoid ring is prime;
A is G-prime and, for every is prime;
A is G-prime and, for some is prime;
is graded prime and, for every is prime;
is graded prime and, for some is prime;
For every e is a support-hub and is prime;
For some e is a support-hub and is prime.
Proof.
It follows from Proposition 4.4, Theorem 1.1, and Proposition 4.7. □
We recall the following result from [Citation9]. In that paper, the authors say that a partial skew group ring is s-unital if it is defined by a partial group action on s-unital ideals.
Theorem 4.10
([Citation9, Theorem 13.7]). Let G be a group and let be an s-unital partial skew group ring. Then, is not prime if, and only if, there are:
subgroups with N finite,
an ideal I of A such that
for every
for every and
(iii) nonzero ideals of such that and for every
Remark 4.11.
Note that, in Theorem 4.9, is an s-unital partial skew group ring. Thus, one can apply Theorem 4.10 to determine whether is prime.
Definition 4.12
([Citation4, Remark 3.4]). A partial action of a connected groupoid G on a ring A is said to be of group-type if there exist an element and a family of morphisms in G such that and for every
Remark 4.13.
If a partial action σ is of group-type (and hence G is connected), then every element of G0 can take the role of e in the above definition (see [Citation4, Remark 3.4]).
By [Citation4, Lemma 3.1], every global action by a connected groupoid is of group-type. The converse does not hold. For an example of a non-global partial action of group-type, we refer the reader to [Citation4, Example 3.5].
Lemma 4.14.
Let be a partial action of G on A such that Ag is s-unital for every and . Furthermore, let and consider the following statements:
σ is of group-type (and G is connected);
For every nonzero element there is some such that r(k) = e and
For every nonzero element there is some such that r(k) = e and
e is a support-hub.
Then, (i) (ii) (iii) (iv).
Proof.
(i) (ii) Suppose that (i) holds. Let and By Remark 4.13(a), since σ is of group-type, there is a morphism such that and Note that Define and the proof is done.
(ii) (iii) Suppose that (ii) holds. Let and By assumption, there is some such that r(k) = e and Since is s-unital, we get
(iii) (iv) Suppose that (iii) holds. Let and By assumption, there is some such that and r(k) = e and Hence, there is some such that Let be an s-unit for and let be an s-unit for Note that and,
Define and note that . Moreover, we have that and are both nonzero. This shows that e is a support-hub.
(iv) (iii) Suppose that (iv) holds. Let and By assumption, there is some such that r(k) = e and is nonzero. Note that Therefore, □
Theorem 4.15.
Let be a partial action of a connected groupoid G on A such that Ag is s-unital for every and σ is of group-type. Then the partial skew groupoid ring is prime if, and only if, there is some such that is prime.
Proof.
It follows from Lemma 4.14 and Theorem 4.9. □
Now, we will make use of the example from [Citation4, Example 3.5] of a non-global partial action of a connected groupoid on a ring, of group-type, and apply Theorem 4.15 to it.
Example 4.16.
Let be the groupoid with and the following composition rules:
We present in the following diagram the structure of G:
Let be the field of complex numbers and let where and We define the partial action of G on A as follows: and where denotes the complex conjugate of a, for all By choosing and we notice that σ is of group-type (cf. Definition 4.12).
Now, we describe the group partial action of on Note that
We claim that Ae is not -prime. Let and Note that I and J are nonzero -invariant ideals of Ae and By Theorem 4.9, is not prime. An analogous argument shows that is not prime. Hence, Theorem 4.15 implies that is not prime.
The following result generalizes [Citation9, Theorem 13.5] from the group setting.
Theorem 4.17.
Let be a partial action of G on A such that Ag is s-unital for every and Furthermore, suppose that there is some such that is torsion-free. Then is prime if, and only if, Ae is -prime and A is G-prime.
Proof.
It follows from Propositions 4.4, 4.7, and Theorem 3.34. □
4.2 Skew groupoid rings
The partial action of G on A is said to be global if for every . In that case, the corresponding partial skew groupoid ring is said to be a skew groupoid ring (see e.g., [Citation20, Citation21]).
Remark 4.18.
Let be a global action of G on A.
For is a ring isomorphism.
Note that , whenever .
The multiplication rule on the skew groupoid ring is induced by the following somewhat simplified rule compared to the partial case:
Theorem 4.19.
Let be a global action of G on A such that Ae is s-unital for every , and let . Suppose that the groupoid G is connected. Then, the skew groupoid ring is prime if, and only if, there is some such that is prime.
Proof.
It follows from Remark 4.13(b) and Theorem 4.15. □
Proposition 4.20.
Let be a global action of G on A such that Ae is s-unital for every , and let . The following statements are equivalent:
is connected;
For every e is a support-hub;
For some e is a support-hub.
Proof.
Obviously, (ii) (iii).
(iii) (i) This follows from Proposition 3.24(ii).
(i) (ii) Suppose that is connected. Take , and let be a nonzero element. Then and, by assumption, there is some such that and Notice that By Lemma 4.14 (ii) (iv), e is a support-hub. □
Below, we summarize our findings for skew groupoid rings.
Theorem 4.21.
Let be a global action of G on A such that Ae is s-unital for every , and let . Then, the following statements are equivalent:
The skew groupoid ring is prime;
A is G-prime, and for every is prime;
A is G-prime, and for some is prime;
is graded prime, and for every is prime;
is graded prime, and for some is prime;
is connected, and for every is prime;
is connected, and for some is prime.
Proof.
It follows from Theorem 4.9 and Proposition 4.20. □
The following example shows that Theorem 4.21 does not generalize to partial skew groupoid rings.
Example 4.22.
Let be a groupoid such that s(g) = f and r(g) = e as follows:
Let Now, we define a partial action of G on A:
and
and
Notice that and are prime rings. Observe that , and that G is connected. However, there are no and such that . Hence, by Lemma 3.20, is not graded prime.
Corollary 4.23.
Let be a global action of G on A such that Ae is s-unital for every , and let . Suppose that there is some such that is torsion-free. Then, the skew groupoid ring is prime if, and only if, Ae is -prime and is connected.
Proof.
It follows from Theorem 4.21 and [Citation9, Theorem 13.5]. □
4.3 Groupoid rings
Let R be an s-unital ring and let G be a groupoid. The groupoid ring consists of elements of the form where is zero for all but finitely many . For and , the multiplication in is defined by the relation , if g, h are composable, and otherwise.
Remark 4.24.
Let R be an s-unital ring and let G be a groupoid. Consider the global action of G on A, defined by letting and for every , and . Notice that the corresponding skew groupoid ring is isomorphic to the groupoid ring .
A subset is said to be R-dense if for every nonzero there is some such that For each define .
Proposition 4.25.
Let G be a groupoid and let R be a nonzero s-unital ring. The following statements are equivalent:
For every is R-dense;
There is some such that is R-dense;
G is connected.
Proof.
(i) (ii) The proof is immediate.
(ii) (iii) Suppose that there is some such that is R-dense. Let and let be nonzero. Clearly, and hence, by assumption, By the definition of , we may find some such that s(g) = f and
(iii) (i) Fix and suppose that G is connected. Clearly, which is R-dense. □
The following theorem generalizes [Citation9, Theorem 12.4].
Theorem 4.26.
Let G be a groupoid and let R be a nonzero s-unital ring. The following statements are equivalent:
The groupoid ring is prime;
G is connected and there is some such that the group ring is prime;
G is connected and, for every the group ring is prime;
There is some such that is R-dense and is prime;
For every is R-dense and is prime;
G is connected, R is prime and there is some such that has no non-trivial finite normal subgroup;
G is connected, R is prime and, for every has no non-trivial finite normal subgroup;
R is prime, and there is some such that is R-dense, and has no non-trivial finite normal subgroup;
R is prime, and for every is R-dense, and has no non-trivial finite normal subgroup.
Proof.
Notice that The proof follows from Remark 4.24, Theorem 4.21(i), (vi), and (vii), Proposition 4.25 and [Citation9, Theorem 12.4]. □
Remark 4.27.
(a) It is known that, in the case where R is a commutative unital ring, the groupoid ring is an example of a Steinberg algebra (see [Citation23, Remark 4.10]). Hence, in that special case, the equivalence between (i) and (iv) in Theorem 4.26 can be obtained using Steinberg’s results from [Citation24, Proposition 4.3], [Citation24, Proposition 4.4], and [Citation24, Theorem 4.9].
(b) In the case where R is unital, after suitable translations of the properties involved, it is possible to obtain e.g. the implication (ii) (i) in Theorem 4.26 from [Citation13, Theorem 3.2].
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Patrik Lundström for making them aware of Munn’s result in [Citation14].
Disclosure statement
The authors report that there are no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Funding
References
- Bagio, D., Flores, D., Paques, A. (2010). Partial actions of ordered groupoids on rings. J. Algebra Appl. 9(3):501–517. DOI: 10.1142/S021949881000404X.
- Bagio, D., Gonçalves, D., Moreira, P. S. E., Öinert, J. (2024). The ideal structure of partial skew groupoid rings with applications to topological dynamics and ultragraph algebras. Forum Math. DOI: 10.1515/forum-2023-0117.(To appear).
- Bagio, D., Paques, A. (2012). Partial groupoid actions: globalization, Morita theory, and Galois theory. Commun. Algebra 40(10):3658–3678. DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2011.592889.
- Bagio, D., Paques, A., Pinedo, H. (2021). On partial skew groupoid rings. Int. J. Algebra Comput. 31(1):1–7. DOI: 10.1142/S0218196721500016.
- Bagio, D., Sant’Ana, A., Tamusiunas, T. (2022). Galois correspondence for group-type partial actions of groupoids. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin. 28(5):745–767. DOI: 10.36045/j.bbms.210807.
- Caenepeel, S., De Groot, E. (2007). Galois theory for weak Hopf algebras. Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 52(2):151–176.
- Connell, I. (1963). On the group ring. Canad. J. Math. 15:650–685. DOI: 10.4153/CJM-1963-067-0.
- Gonçalves, D., Yoneda, G. (2016). Free path groupoid grading on Leavitt path algebras. Int. J. Algebra Comput. 26(6):1217–1235. DOI: 10.1142/S021819671650051X.
- Lännström, D., Lundström, P., Öinert, J., Wagner, S. (2021). Prime group graded rings with applications to partial crossed products and Leavitt path algebras. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.09224.
- Lännström, D., Öinert, J. (2022). Graded von Neumann regularity of rings graded by semigroups. Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie/Contributions to Algebra and Geometry. DOI: 10.1007/s13366-022-00673-9.(To appear).
- Lundström, P. (2004). The category of groupoid graded modules. Colloq. Math. 100(2):195–211. DOI: 10.4064/cm100-2-4.
- Lundström, P. (2006). Strongly groupoid graded rings and cohomology. Colloq. Math. 106(1):1–13. DOI: 10.4064/cm106-1-1.
- Munn, W. D. (1990). On contracted semigroup rings. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 115(1–2):109–117. DOI: 10.1017/S0308210500024604.
- Munn, W. D. (2000). Rings graded by bisimple inverse semigroups. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 130(3):603–609. DOI: 10.1017/S0308210500000329.
- Nystedt, P. (2019). A survey of s-unital and locally unital rings. Rev. Integr. Temas Mat. 37(2):251–260. DOI: 10.18273/revint.v37n2-2019003.
- Nystedt, P., Öinert, J. (2020). Group gradations on Leavitt path algebras. J. Algebra Appl. 19(9):2050165. DOI: 10.1142/S0219498820501650.
- Nystedt, P., Öinert, J., Pinedo, H. (2018). Epsilon-strongly graded rings, separability and semisimplicity. J. Algebra 514:1–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2018.08.002.
- Nystedt, P., Öinert, J., Pinedo, H. (2020). Epsilon-strongly groupoid-graded rings, the Picard inverse category and cohomology. Glasg. Math. J. 62(1):233–259. DOI: 10.1017/S0017089519000065.
- Öinert, J. Units, zero-divisors and idempotents in rings graded by torsion-free groups. J. Group Theory, to appear.
- Öinert, J., Lundström, P. (2010). Commutativity and ideals in category crossed products. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. 59(4):338–346. DOI: 10.3176/proc.2010.4.13.
- Öinert, J., Lundström, P. (2012). The ideal intersection property for groupoid graded rings. Commun. Algebra 40(5):1860–1871. DOI: 10.1080/00927872.2011.559181.
- Passman, D. S. (1984). Infinite crossed products and group-graded rings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 284(2):707–727. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1984-0743740-2.
- Steinberg, B. (2010). A groupoid approach to discrete inverse semigroup algebras. Adv. Math. 223(2):689–727. DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2009.09.001.
- Steinberg, B. (2019). Prime étale groupoid algebras with applications to inverse semigroup and Leavitt path algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223(6):2474–2488. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.09.003.
- Tominaga, H. (1976). On s-unital rings. Math. J. Okayama univ. 18:117–134.