Publication Cover
Nutritional Neuroscience
An International Journal on Nutrition, Diet and Nervous System
Volume 27, 2024 - Issue 6
2,257
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

A comprehensive examination of the evidence for whole of diet patterns in Parkinson's disease: a scoping review

ORCID Icon, , &

ABSTRACT

Both motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), a progressive neurological condition, have broad-ranging impacts on nutritional intake and dietary behaviour. Historically studies focused on individual dietary components, but evidence demonstrating ameliorative outcomes with whole-of-diet patterns such as Mediterranean and Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) is emerging. These diets provide plenty of antioxidant rich fruits, vegetables, nuts, wholegrains and healthy fats. Paradoxically, the ketogenic diet, high fat and very low carbohydrate, is also proving to be beneficial. Within the PD community, it is well advertised that nutritional intake is associated with disease progression and symptom severity but understandably, the messaging is inconsistent. With projected prevalence estimated to rise to 1.6 million by 2037, more data regarding the impact of whole-of-diet patterns is needed to develop diet-behaviour change programmes and provide clear advice for PD management. Objectives and Methods: Objectives of this scoping review of both peer-reviewed academic and grey literatures are to determine the current evidence-based consensus for best dietary practice in PD and to ascertain whether the grey literature aligns. Results and Discussion: The consensus from the academic literature was that a MeDi/MIND whole of diet pattern (fresh fruit, vegetables, wholegrains, omega-3 fish and olive oil) is the best practice for improving PD outcomes. Support for the KD is emerging, but further research is needed to determine long-term effects. Encouragingly, the grey literature mostly aligned but nutrition advice was rarely forefront. The importance of nutrition needs greater emphasis in the grey literature, with positive messaging on dietary approaches for management of day-to-day symptoms.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurological condition that is primarily characterised by a triad of motor symptoms, principally resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, with postural instability appearing as the disease progresses [Citation1,Citation2]. These symptoms are caused by loss of dopaminergic neurones from a region of the brain known as the substantia nigra pars compacta, with the pathological signature of intracellular aggregates of protein α-synuclein (Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites) [Citation2]. PD also causes significant non-motor symptoms such as disturbances in autonomic function (e.g. hypotension, gastrointestinal symptoms), sleep disturbances, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and dementia [Citation3]. Symptoms, therefore, can have broad-ranging impacts on health-related quality of life (QoL) [Citation4]. The cause of PD is still unknown, but it is believed that a complex interplay between multiple factors such as environment, genetics, advancing age and chemical exposure increase the risk of developing the condition [Citation5].

In terms of burden, PD is estimated to affect 6 million individuals worldwide and cause 3.2 million disability affected life years (DALYs) each year [Citation6]. Globally, in 2015 it was the fastest growing neurological disorder [Citation7], estimated to have increased by a factor of 2.4 between 1990 and 2016 [Citation6]. In 2017, the total economic burden of PD in the US was estimated at approximately USD $51.9 billion, with direct medical costs of $25.4 billion and indirect and non-medical costs of $26.5 billion [Citation8]. Yang et al. estimate the projected PD prevalence to be greater than 1.6 million and projected total economic burden to surpass $79 billion by 2037 [Citation8]. These trends are thought to be driven by increasing life expectancy and therefore, longer disease duration, as well as environmental and population health factors that include diet [Citation6,Citation9].

There also exists a social burden of the disease caused by emotional and communicative changes that disrupt social functioning and can disadvantage daily life [Citation10]. These less recognised social symptoms can lead to isolation and loneliness that may cause severe negative consequences for an individual’s well-being [Citation10]. As the disease progresses, increasing severity of both motor and non-motor symptoms can significantly impact dietary choices and nutritional intake. In particular, non-motor symptoms such as hyposmia, constipation, cognitive impairment and depression may have a negative influence [Citation5]. Additionally, the increasing disruption caused by psychosocial and physical symptoms can lead to feelings of stigma and dehumanisation that are experienced equally by both the individual with PD and their caregiver, thereby contributing further to their QoL burden [Citation10–12].

Whilst there remains no cure for PD, current medical management of PD is predominantly targeted at alleviating motor symptoms [Citation13], with levodopa being the mainstay of pharmacotherapy since 1960s [Citation13,Citation14]. Levodopa is the precursor to dopamine and therefore levodopa-based medications are designed to counterbalance depleting dopamine levels in the brain [Citation13]. Issues arise with levodopa therapy however, as the medication causes problematic side effects, which increase as the illness progresses and are a major part of the individual’s disease experience [Citation13]. Side-effects include nausea, diarrhoea, constipation, dry mouth, tiredness, indigestion and heartburn as well as vitamin B12 and folate deficiency, all of which have the potential to significantly affect nutritional intake and status [Citation13,Citation14]. Moreover, the efficacy of levodopa decreases as the disease progresses leading to longer ‘off’ times and worsening symptoms [Citation14]. Bioavailability is greatest if consumed on an empty stomach but this can increase nausea side effects therefore, it is often recommended to be taken with meals. For some individuals the responsiveness to levodopa is blunted, possibly due to ‘protein competition’, or to non-motor symptoms such as delayed gastric emptying and constipation [Citation15]. The timing of meals with medication and strategies to improve levodopa efficacy continues to be a well-researched topic [Citation13–15].

Despite the already-high economic, physical and social burden of PD and predictions of increasing prevalence, the evidence for interventions to improve disease progression, symptom severity and QoL for individuals living with PD is still inconclusive [Citation16]. Whilst many non-pharmacological intervention studies focus on self-management and target exercise regimes [Citation17], there are fewer that involve a whole of diet approach [Citation16], particularly those that take into consideration symptom-related limitations and QoL [Citation10]. The role of nutrition therapy is gaining momentum but there is still a critical need for research to support nutrition focussed interventions and inform policies on sustainable treatment and self-management options for individuals living with this condition [Citation16,Citation18–20].

1.1. Academic research

To date, much of the research has focussed on the protective effects of specific nutrients against symptom severity and the risk of progression of PD, with examples including (but not limited to) caffeine [Citation21,Citation22]; alcohol [Citation23]; Omega-3 [Citation24]; vitamins E [Citation24], C, [Citation25] and B [Citation26]; anti-oxidants and phytochemicals present in fruit and vegetables [Citation27]; soy [Citation28]; and minerals such as iron, zinc, and copper [Citation29]. Other areas of research include dietary approaches to improve levodopa therapy [Citation14,Citation15,Citation30] and the role of the gut microbiome in PD [Citation31–34]. However, much of the evidence is inconclusive for example, large-scale cohort and cross-sectional studies on dairy foods [Citation22,Citation35] have reported both positive and negative associations with the risk of developing PD. The study of individual components of diet does not adequately capture many of the other influencing factors in PD, in particular those that have an effect on, or are affected by daily living experiences. Again, this suggests that employing a whole of diet approach may not only answer outstanding questions surrounding disease risk, progression, symptom severity, but also be more practical for those living with PD.

Recent research has demonstrated positive health outcomes for an overall high quality diet for reducing the risk of PD [Citation36]. Likewise, diets high in fruits, vegetables, whole grains and healthy fats, such as the Mediterranean diet (MeDi) [Citation37], and the Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay diet (MIND) [Citation38] are protective against PD and have been associated with improved motor and nonmotor symptom severity and slowing disease progression [Citation38–43]. Paradoxically, the ketogenic diet (KD) which comprises high fats, moderate proteins and very low carbohydrates (CHO) [Citation44] has also been associated with improved cognition and health outcomes in PD [Citation45,Citation46]. However, the KD is highly restrictive and many find it hard to adhere to outside of a clinical setting [Citation47].

Poor nutritional status and malnutrition are significant feature in PD [Citation48] that have been associated with reduced QoL and increasing disease severity and progression [Citation49–51]. Both non-motor and motor symptoms can impact normal eating behaviours such as shopping, preparing and cooking meals, leading to reduced intake, often of poorer quality, that therefore cannot be overlooked [Citation3,Citation52,Citation53].

Lifestyle strategies employed by individuals with PD to maintain optimal health have been poorly researched [Citation54]. Health advice providing practical nutrition information on whole of diet patterns would present a more global approach which may be more achievable for the individual [Citation19]. Therefore, clinical findings supporting the impact of whole of diet patterns are necessary to develop diet behaviour change programmes and evidence-based advice for individuals living with PD [Citation19].

1.2. The internet and its emerging role in PD management

Given the increasing prevalence and isolating nature of many neurological conditions, the internet provides a particularly appealing method of sourcing disease-related information and connecting with the community [Citation55]. Patients, their caregivers and family members often turn to the internet, to learn more about their condition, including advice on diet [Citation54]. This reliance on the internet may not necessarily be perceived as a problem as it provides relief for over-stretched healthcare providers; however, despite these advantages, the quality and validity of the information varies [Citation54]. The landscape of health-care delivery, whether being provided by accredited health care professionals or others, is changing due to the emergence of e-health [Citation56]. In an environment where there is a growing trend towards active self-management of one’s disease or condition, the internet offers a way to increase efficiency of care delivery whilst reducing economic burden [Citation54,Citation56]. A recent survey of 346 Swedish individuals living with PD found that amongst those under 65 years, the most valued source of disease-specific knowledge was found online, whereas the older age groups more frequently sought information from patient organisations [Citation54]. The potential downfall of the internet is the existence of web based low-quality information, misinformation, or insufficient information in the community, which may be detrimental for health outcomes and QoL among people with PD. False or misleading claims lacking in scientific evidence are also easy to access and could provide questionable health advice, which then represents a key challenge [Citation57].

Nevertheless, the internet provides an increasingly popular avenue for information and advice for people with PD, the validity of which may be variable and possibly misleading. Therefore, the first objective of this scoping review was to appraise the peer-reviewed academic literature and synthesise the research evidence surrounding whole of diet patterns which offer the best outcomes for the management of PD. The underlying aim was to determine the informed consensus on best practice for reducing risk, slowing disease progression and improving management and severity of symptoms. The second objective of this review was to scope the grey literature for dietary advice from professional bodies, governments, not-for-profit agencies and patient communities. The purpose was to determine whether the academic and grey literature align, and to investigate if the content of informal dietary advice is supported by evidence-based recommendations for those living with PD. For clarification, differences between academic and grey literature are described below.

2. Methods

This scoping review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [Citation58].

2.1. Eligibility criteria

To be included in the review, peer-reviewed studies needed to have been published in the last 10 years and to evaluate whole of diet patterns (e.g. overall diet quality, MeDi, KD) and their impact on adults’ risk of PD, PD status, PD symptom alleviation or disease progression. Eligible grey literature included any web pages that provided dietary pattern recommendations for individuals to reduce their risk of PD, or alleviate PD symptoms, or slow disease progression. A detailed overview of study eligibility criteria is provided in .

Table 1. Eligibility criteria.

2.2. Information sources

2.2.1. Academic literature

Academic literature has been described as ‘scholarly publications that report original empirical and theoretical work in the natural and social sciences’ [Citation59] and it is generally commercially published. Five academic databases were searched: Medline, Embase, Scopus, CIHNAL, and PsychInfo.

2.2.2. Grey literature

In 2010 Schöpfel defined grey literature as ‘manifold document types produced on all levels of government, academics, business and industry in print and electronic formats that are protected by intellectual property rights, of sufficient quality to be collected and preserved by library holdings or institutional repositories, but not controlled by commercial publishers i.e. where publishing is not the primary activity of the producing body’ [Citation60]. The grey literature search included only sites that provided diet and nutrition advice and were recently published (i.e. 2012 onward). The search comprised two government websites, seven peak professional bodies, two university or medical websites, seven foundations, seven news/other, seven influential blogs, eight social media/Facebook, seven YouTube videos and seven books (Supplementary Table 1).

2.3. Search strategy

Concepts: (1) PD and (2) Dietary pattern.

A search strategy was developed for Medline and then adapted for the other databases. The search strategy was developed with the assistance of an academic librarian and validated through comparison with previous reviews [Citation19,Citation20,Citation36,Citation58].

2.4. Selection of sources of evidence

Articles were screened using a combination of Endnote (v.20) software [Citation61] and web-based collaboration software platform, Covidence [Citation62]. Articles were screened independently by two researchers (JR and JR) using an elimination process (based on title, abstract, key terms, full articles in ascending order). The results were compared and consolidated through consensus between the two researchers with any disagreements resolved through discussion.

2.5. Data extraction (charting)

Data were extracted by members of the authorship team. Data extracted were related to publication details, study characteristics (country, aims, design), participant sample (population, health status, sample size, sex, age), methodology (study duration, intervention description, comparator), main findings, and statistical significance of findings.

3. Results

Searches identified 2159 articles from five databases, 732 duplicates were removed leaving 1427 records remaining. In total 1395 articles were removed during screening leaving a total of 32 studies included in the review ().

Figure 1. Study flow diagram. From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

Figure 1. Study flow diagram. From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

The dietary patterns included in this review are detailed in .

Table 2. Dietary patterns diet quality scoring methods studied.

3.1. Study characteristics

As summarised in , studies were conducted across the globe with six from USA [Citation39,Citation64,Citation65,Citation68,Citation70,Citation71]; four from Italy [Citation72–75]; three from UK [Citation67,Citation76,Citation77]; two studies each from Greece [Citation78,Citation79] and Iran [Citation80,Citation81]; and one study from Australia [Citation82]; Belgium [Citation83]; Canada [Citation40], China [Citation84]; Germany [Citation85]; Ghana [Citation86]; India [Citation87]; Japan [Citation88]; Mexico [Citation89]; the Netherlands [Citation90]; New Zealand [Citation63]; Poland [Citation91]; Finland [Citation69]; Sweden [Citation92]; and Turkey [Citation66]. Studies were categorised into their study type () and included twelve cross-sectional studies [Citation39,Citation40,Citation67,Citation68,Citation70,Citation76,Citation77,Citation79,Citation83,Citation87,Citation89,Citation91]; ten case studies [Citation71–75,Citation82,Citation84–86,Citation88]; six randomised controlled trials [Citation63,Citation64–66,Citation80,Citation81]; and four cohort studies [Citation69,Citation78,Citation90,Citation92].

Table 3. Study characteristics and outcomes.

3.2. Study population characteristics

Study samples encompassed populations from around the globe and two studies were conducted on the same cohort [Citation80,Citation81]. The balance of male and female participants was fairly equal (mean female participants = 46.8%, SD = 14.7), with one study including only females [Citation92]. The median age was 64.3 (IQR 61–69) and study population sizes varied according to study type with sample numbers ranging between 52 and 18,529 for cross-sectional studies; 67–1200 for case studies; 16–105 for RCT studies; and 4524–47,128 for cohort studies.

3.3. Dietary pattern characteristics

provides details of the main whole of diet patterns studied and provides details of the diet included in each study. Findings are displayed in . Where relevant, various different scoring indexes were used to measure dietary intake and diet quality such as adherence to MeDi, DASH, MIND, AHEI, DII and HDI [Citation39,Citation40,Citation67–69,Citation71,Citation74,Citation79–81,Citation92]. Three studies examined quality or adequacy of diet compared to the country’s dietary guidelines [Citation83,Citation89,Citation90]. Six studies compared dietary intakes between PD and healthy controls (HC) [Citation72,Citation74,Citation82,Citation86,Citation89,Citation91]. Eleven studies investigated the effect of dietary intake on the risk of PD; five of these examined overall diet [Citation73,Citation75,Citation78,Citation87,Citation88]; and four adherence to MeDi diet [Citation39,Citation40,Citation90,Citation92]; two reported MIND adherence [Citation39,Citation40]; and one AHEI adherence [Citation69]. Risk of PD was measured by PD incidence, age of onset and adjusted disease duration, details for each study are included in . There were six studies that examined the effects of a specific dietary intervention on PD outcomes, these included two with a MeDi intervention [Citation80,Citation81] and four with a KD, or low CHO ketogenic style diet intervention [Citation63–66]. Philips et al. [Citation63] compared KD with a low fat dietary intervention and Krikorian et al. [Citation65] compared KD with a high CHO dietary intervention typical of a Western diet. Sauerbier et al. [Citation77] compared dietary intakes of PD patients from three ethnic groups from UK and Okubo et al. [Citation88] categorised and then compared three dietary patterns from Japan. Gupta et al. [Citation87] investigated environmental factors which included vegetarian versus non-vegetarian diets in India; and Hegelmaier et al. [Citation85] explored the effects of a 2-week vegetarian diet on PD symptoms and the gut microbiome in Germans.

Figure 2. Overview of academic literature findings. Green (+) fields indicate an inverse association between dietary pattern and PD risk, onset, or symptom severity. Beige fields indicate no association and purple fields report outcomes. [NR, not reported].

Figure 2. Overview of academic literature findings. Green (+) fields indicate an inverse association between dietary pattern and PD risk, onset, or symptom severity. Beige fields indicate no association and purple fields report outcomes. [NR, not reported].

3.4. Dietary related PD outcomes

Dietary patterns differed across the studies, mostly due to the variety of ethnic and cultural backgrounds of the study populations. Regardless, the underlying theme reported throughout was that a healthy diet incorporating higher intakes of fruit, vegetables, fish and healthy fats such as MeDi, was associated with lower incidence of PD, milder symptom severity and slower disease progression (). Adherence to either MeDi or MIND dietary pattern was found to be protective in seven studies [Citation70,Citation73,Citation80,Citation81,Citation88,Citation90,Citation92] with reasons given that these foods are rich in antioxidants and therefore exert anti-inflammatory properties that are protective against the underlying aetiology of PD [Citation39,Citation40,Citation67,Citation68,Citation71,Citation73,Citation80,Citation81,Citation92]. Additionally, higher dietary fibre intakes were suggested to support the gut microbiome [Citation68,Citation72,Citation79,Citation85] and may also help to improve the PD symptoms of constipation [Citation82,Citation86]. Conversely, in studies where processed meats [Citation75], alcohol, and discretionary foods [Citation75,Citation82] were measured, intakes were reported to be negatively associated with PD outcomes. These foods were considered to exacerbate PD symptoms and disease progression due to their capacity to increase oxidative stress [Citation39,Citation80] and be unfavourable for the gut microbiome [Citation68,Citation85]. As has been reported previously, higher intakes of dairy, specifically milk, [Citation69,Citation78,Citation89] were associated with an increased risk of PD [Citation69,Citation78]. Speculated reasons for this were pesticide exposure and altered uric acid metabolism [Citation78].

Another underlying theme was that diet quality appeared to decline with PD onset and progression. Of the studies that compared PD diets with their national guidelines, all three reported PD diets to be inadequate [Citation76,Citation83,Citation89]. Where PD dietary intakes were compared with HC [Citation72,Citation74,Citation82,Citation86,Citation89,Citation91], all reported either inadequate intakes or poorer diet quality for PD compared to HC. Metcalfe-Roach et al. [Citation40] found higher adherence to MeDi was associated with delayed onset of PD, yet Alcalay et al. [Citation71] found those with PD had poorer adherence to MeDi, which suggests an effect of reverse causality [Citation79]. Indeed, altered food preferences in PD were reported to influence intakes by Cassani et al. [Citation74] and Palavra et al. [Citation82]. Macronutrient differences were varied, again, possibly due to different traditional diets across the study populations. Only Barichella et al. [Citation72] reported a significantly higher energy intake in PD than HC. They, as well as Palavra et al. [Citation82], observed higher CHO intakes. Protein intakes were found to be higher in PD in three studies [Citation72,Citation76,Citation82]. Barichella et al. reported higher protein intake for those not adhering to a protein redistribution diet (n = 233) compared to those who were (n = 277) [Citation72]. Higher fat intakes (unhealthy fats) were observed in four studies [Citation72,Citation74,Citation84,Citation91], purportedly due to increased discretionary food intakes [Citation74,Citation82,Citation84]. Fruit and vegetable intakes were generally similar across healthy subjects and those with PD, with only Navarro-Meza et al. [Citation89] and Zapala et al. reporting intakes that were significantly lower in PD than HC.

Alterations to food preferences with PD were suggested as reasons for dietary intake differences due to concerns about protein/drug interactions and PD symptoms such as dysphagia, olfactory changes (hyposmia), constipation, and depression [Citation74,Citation82,Citation84]. In addition, Palavra et al. [Citation82] suggested altered dopaminergic signalling and cognition affecting food reward and mood to be the reasons for higher CHO intakes in the form of added sugars. Four studies reported higher intakes of discretionary type foods such as added sugars, animal fats and refined cereals [Citation72,Citation74,Citation82,Citation89]. Inadequate fluid intake was frequently observed in those with PD [Citation72,Citation74,Citation76,Citation83,Citation86] and linked to PD symptoms such as dysphagia and hyposmia [Citation72,Citation74,Citation83,Citation86]. Constipation, another prevalent PD symptom that can be exacerbated by low fluid intake, was observed in two studies [Citation72,Citation83].

Findings from the four KD intervention studies all indicated some positive associations with various PD outcomes after the KD or high fat low CHO intervention [Citation63–66]. Tidman et al. [Citation64] saw improvements in anxiety and metabolic biomarkers; Koyuncu et al. [Citation66] found improved voice quality; and Krikorian et al. [Citation65] reported enhanced cognitive performance in mild PD cognitive impairment after an 8-week period of ketosis. Interestingly, Phillips et al. [Citation63] observed equally positive benefits in motor and non-motor symptoms from both their KD and low fat, high CHO intervention arms [Citation63]. All authors recommend further studies with larger sample sizes and longer duration to elucidate the pathophysiology and central mechanisms of these findings [Citation63–66].

3.5. Content of grey literature

A detailed description of the sources for the grey literature search is provided in Supplementary Table 1 and the findings are summarised in Supplementary Table 2 (Accurate as of 17.01.2023). Thirteen peak nutrition and dietetics bodies such as Dietitians Australia and American Nutrition Association were identified, none had links to information specific to PD. The main government health websites rarely commented on PD but the US National Institutes of Health website [Citation93] and Health Direct Australia website [Citation94] provided brief advice and links to nutrition-related resources. The MIND diet was mentioned with reference to dementia but not PD specifically. The overall theme across peak PD bodies was that, although there is no specific diet for PD, a diet rich in fruit, vegetables and dietary fibre, wholegrains and healthy fats such as the MeDi, was repeatedly recommended, as well as plenty of fluids. Information provided by the majority of the peak bodies focused more specifically on timing of medications and drug efficacy, such as redistribution of protein, to optimise efficacy of levodopa. They also covered symptomatic management for swallowing, constipation and related malnutrition.

Most PD foundations were involved in research and the recruitment of participants for their studies with relevant discussion on their pages thereof. The main topics of information included the importance of healthy nutrition to alleviate PD symptoms such as constipation; how to manage dysphagia and hyposmia; and potential gut microbiome links with PD. Most foundations also had links to at least one blog site, and/or had links to YouTube videos. PD-specific medical news and magazine circulars reported the latest findings from studies and included special features on these. Although there were commonalities and divergences in the advice, most were based on scientific evidence.

As was expected, social media sites were plentiful and appeared to have an even mix of private and public groups, where posts ranged from evidence-based advice to the furthest extreme of fad cures and miraculous recoveries. YouTube videos were mostly produced by peak bodies and/or foundations and covered practical tips for maintaining a healthy diet and overcoming barriers to cooking and eating healthy arising from PD and PD drug related symptoms. Finally, with the advent of e-books, there appeared to be many available titles that were independently published within the past 2–3 years. This review selected a sample of these including two whose authors were qualified nutritionists and two authors with PD. The selected titles covered healthy plant-based dietary advice, backed up by recipes.

In summary, dietary advice in the grey literature tended towards a common theme that there is not one particular diet for PD. However, whole food plant-based diets that include higher intakes of olive oil, legumes, vegetables and fruit as well as lower intakes of processed foods, meat, and animal fats, were generally recommended. This pattern of eating recapitulates the MIND diet, the DASH diet and the MeDi. Concurrently, there was emerging favourable evidence supporting a KD, but most reported on small trials and suggested further research would be prudent. Other categories that featured were interactions between levodopa and certain nutrients (predominantly protein), dysphagia and poor nutrition or malnutrition. The importance of maintaining good hydration was also emphasised. Overall diet and nutrition generally featured as low priority and, in many cases, had to be specifically searched for, rather than being presented on the main page. This may imply a lack of felt importance and/or a lack scientific consensus, which is reflected in the placing of the information.

4. Discussion

The results from the review of the academic literature were that adherence to a healthy diet with higher intakes of fruits, vegetables, fish and healthy fats such as MeDi or MIND diet patterns are associated with better outcomes for PD. The grey literature, although following the same theme, did not feature diet as a main priority in PD management, more as an additional benefit. Adherence to MeDi or MIND diet patterns were found to lead to improved outcomes in all but two of the studies where they were measured in this review. Both the MeDi and MIND diets include plentiful antioxidant-rich fruits, vegetables and olive oil, all of which are rich sources of dietary fibre and polyphenolic phytochemicals [Citation39,Citation40,Citation68,Citation71,Citation79–81,Citation90,Citation92,Citation95,Citation96]. In addition, the diets provide a good source of fermentable dietary fibre required to maintain a healthy gut microbiome [Citation68,Citation79,Citation80] and the inclusion of plenty of healthy fats for cell repair and brain health [Citation80,Citation81]. Neuroinflammation caused by oxidative stress is known to participate in the pathogenesis of PD [Citation97]. Therefore, these antioxidant-rich diets represent a potential mechanism to alleviate PD pathology [Citation98]. A dietary fibre-deprived gut microbiome has also been associated with higher circulating cytokines and chronic low grade inflammation [Citation99]. Furthermore, gut microbiome profiles have recently been found to differ in individuals with PD compared to the general ageing population [Citation85,Citation100]. Evidence from a 2021 [Citation32] review suggests that gut dysbiosis may precede the onset of motor symptoms of PD, therefore demonstrating how the MeDi and MIND diets offer a preventive effect. These topics were well covered by the grey literature.

A KD broadly describes a diet that restricts CHO intake thereby inducing a state of ketogenesis in the individual [Citation44,Citation45]. The diet has consistently been shown to be effective in the management of epilepsy with some positive findings also reported for Alzheimer’s and PD [Citation46], but studies have lacked rigour [Citation45]. Two suggested mechanisms behind the benefits of the KD were covered in both the academic and the grey literature. The first was that ketosis could potentially enhance central and peripheral neurone energy metabolism through increased mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate production [Citation45,Citation63,Citation64]. The second was that a high fat diet stimulates dopaminergic activation in the central nervous system [Citation66]. Krikorian et al. further proposed that metabolic disturbance and insulin resistance exhibited by 80% of PD patients may be a contributing aetiological factor. In this review, the studies investigating KD reported beneficial outcomes for cognitive performance [Citation65], speech and voice disorders [Citation66], both motor and non-motor symptoms [Citation63] and anxiety and body composition [Citation64] in PD. All authors emphasised the need for further research and none explored long term effects on PD outcomes, or long or short-term effects on the gut microbiome. The fact that KD restricts most of the protective foods included in MeDi and MIND (vegetables, grains, legumes and fruit), thereby limiting dietary fibre and phytochemicals, the need for studies into the longer-term safety of KD and the impact on the gut microbiome is warranted [Citation47]. In the grey literature, KD was occasionally featured by PD news websites but generally only recommended by the KD-specific sites.

In this review, the academic literature demonstrated that diet quality in those with PD was frequently suboptimal, with dysphagia, constipation and loss of smell (hyposmia) being the most prevalent PD symptoms leading to detrimental changes in habitual intakes. Additionally, intakes of CHO in PD were often of the more refined variety, being synonymous with a Western dietary pattern [Citation82,Citation91], which was associated with greater symptom severity and poorer PD outcomes [Citation70,Citation88,Citation91,Citation101]. Although the importance of healthy eating by including plenty of fruits, vegetables, wholegrains and oily fish were well covered in the grey literature, there was little information covering the detrimental consequences of consuming a Western dietary pattern on PD symptom severity. A dietary regimen of fruits, vegetables and soluble dietary fibre, in conjunction with adequate fluids is recommended as a management strategy to improve constipation in PD [Citation101]. When measured, it was found that fluid intakes were frequently below recommendations and/or lower in PD than HC [Citation72,Citation74,Citation76,Citation83,Citation86] which is an often overlooked issue in PD management [Citation102,Citation103]. About half of the sources of nutrition advice in grey literature mentioned the elevated risks associated with dehydration, the need to maintain fluid intake and how to do this with dysphagia.

While not significant, energy intakes in PD were often higher than in the control groups [Citation74,Citation82,Citation84], however, as has been found elsewhere, lower BMI or body weight was also observed amongst PD in this review [Citation72,Citation74,Citation82,Citation86,Citation87,Citation89]. Dietary protein and drug-nutrient interactions with levodopa [Citation13,Citation104] have been extensively researched in the past decades, however in this review only one study included protein redistribution diet and protein intake [Citation72]. Their data suggested that drug-nutrient interactions could be better managed in terms of motor symptom fluctuations, with a protein redistribution diet [Citation72]. Indeed, nutrition interventions that include protein redistribution, dietary fibre, vitamin C and caffeine have been recommended to improve levodopa therapy [Citation30]. In contrast, protein restriction diets have been linked to weight loss and impaired nutritional status [Citation104]. PD associated malnutrition, sarcopenia and dynapenia are key issues that increase with severity of symptoms and are associated with poorer outcomes and QoL [Citation50,Citation51,Citation105,Citation106]. Protein intake and levodopa interactions were well covered in the grey literature, with the general consensus recommending that protein should not be restricted but medications should be consumed 30–60 min prior to a meal.

Both non-motor symptoms and motor symptoms can lead to elevated metabolic demands in PD [Citation105,Citation107] due to degenerative nature of the disease and altered gut motility that may affect absorption of nutrients [Citation105]. In addition to increased energy demands, other PD symptoms such as impaired fine motricity and dysphagia requiring texture modification of foods, as well as depression, cognitive impairment, hyposmia, and constipation all contribute to diminished appetite and poorer nutrition quality [Citation74,Citation82,Citation84,Citation105,Citation106]. Nutrition interventions to reverse malnutrition in PD patients, especially in advanced age, have been found to lead to improvements [Citation49,Citation50,Citation63,Citation108]. In the grey literature, the importance of maintaining body weight and preventing muscle loss was well covered by the peak bodies. YouTube videos were arguably the best resource for providing information on how to manage daily symptoms and facilitate healthy eating. Often these were presented by individuals with PD themselves, however, this information mostly required some prior searching and was not front and foremost.

Interestingly, all of the intervention studies in this review led to improvements in PD symptoms, regardless of the dietary pattern being implemented [Citation63–66,Citation80,Citation81]. This implies that provision of nutritional guidance in the form of a suggested daily/weekly menu plan is of value in the care of those with PD. This was well covered in the grey literature, where many of the peak bodies had links to recipes and menus for healthy eating that were based on MeDi-style ingredients. Other sectors of the grey literature, especially e-books, also provided plenty of guidance and recipes for how to follow particular dietary patterns; however, these were not always based on scientific evidence.

4.1. Strengths and limitations of this study

This study was the first to review both the current peer-reviewed academic literature and the grey literature i.e. public discourse through peak bodies, social media, blogs and other electronic forums worldwide, on the association between whole of diet patterns with PD risk, symptom severity and disease progression. The search strategy included electronic databases with peer-reviewed literature as well as grey literature sources, focussing on the general adult population at risk of or diagnosed with PD. To our knowledge, this is the first time the information provided in open electronic forums, or the grey literature, has been compared with the consensus in the academic literature. Our findings provide valuable insight into the content, integrity and gaps in information that represent a major communication source for those with PD.

Studying the grey literature will always be limited by the fact that social media and e-health platforms are constantly evolving and it is, therefore, impossible to capture everything. The academic literature review spanned the globe and highlighted similarities and differences experienced by those with PD from various cultural and ethnic backgrounds, particularly emphasising the need to consider the typical diet of the study population when providing dietary advice. The grey literature review included mostly US sources (20 from US, 5 from UK, 4 from Australia and 3 from Canada) and was limited to those in English, therefore may not be a true representation of available information. In addition, the grey literature is targeted to those who already have a diagnosis; therefore, advice on how to reduce the risk of PD is generally not relevant and would fall under the general population nutrition websites.

4.2. Conclusion

The general consensus in the academic literature is that a MeDi/MIND whole of diet pattern with plenty of fresh fruit, vegetables, wholegrains, omega-3 fish and olive oil is best practice for slower progression of disease, improved PD symptoms and decreased PD incidence. Support for the KD is emerging, but long-term studies are needed to further investigate enduring effects on PD, microbiome and sustainability. There was no evidence in either academic or grey literatures to suggest that the diet alone is better than currently available medicine, rather that it should be considered as an adjunct. Encouragingly, the grey literature mostly aligned with the academic literature; however, the topic of nutrition was rarely forefront and, as is often the case with the internet, contained conflicting advice that could be confusing. More emphasis on the importance and significance of good nutrition in the grey literature is needed with positive messaging on dietary approaches to manage day-to-day symptoms. Considering the complex and multifactorial nature of the disease, a personalised approach that considers each patient's unique needs and symptoms would be ideal. Nevertheless, based on the current evidence, some dietary patterns that may be beneficial for Parkinson's disease include the Mediterranean diet, the DASH diet, and the MIND diet.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (49 KB)

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Vanessa Sutton for her assistance with the initial searches of the academic literature and her preliminary compilation of the grey literature.

Data availability statement

Authors agree to make data and materials supporting the results or analyses presented in their paper available upon reasonable request.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by MSWA.

Notes on contributors

Joanna Rees

Dr Joanna Rees is a post-doctoral research academic and an Accredited Practicing Dietitian. She has 7 years' experience in gut health research where her studies have involved the impacts of a community-based food literacy cooking program on the gut microbiome and mental health. She has experience in dietary fibres, specifically from fruit and vegetables her recent work involves developing resources for improving fruit and vegetable/dietary fibre intakes and diet quality for the neurological community.

Jillian Ryan

Dr Jillian Ryan is a post-doctoral research consultant currently working for BVA BDRC and is involved in human-centred research focusing on qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. Her areas of research include behavioural change and developing digital products to address key health challenges. She is a champion of the end user's voice.

Manja Laws

Ms Manja Laws is currently the project coordinator for the Systematic Profiling in Neurological Conditions (SPIN) Research Program which aims to develop and implement treatment strategies that target specific health problems for individuals living with a neurological condition. SPIN prioritises engagement with those with lived experience of neurological conditions, and their relevant others, to direct the research program.

Amanda Devine

Amanda Devine has 25 years' experience in research at UWA and ECU. As a Professor of Public Health Nutrition at ECU she has worked on 60 nutrition-related research projects with total funding worth over $4.2m where research into practice is a priority. She is the Associate Dean of Public Health and OHS and Professor of Public Health Nutrition in the School of Medical and Health Sciences. Her research areas extend from regional and remote nutrition and include food security, how patterns of eating impact gut health across the life course, chronic disease and clinical nutrition, food literacy and food and nutrition education.

References

  • Pagano G, Ferrara N, Brooks DJ, et al. Age at onset and Parkinson disease phenotype. Neurology. 2016;86(15):1400–7. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002461
  • Kouli A, Torsney KM, Kuan WL. Parkinson’s disease: etiology, neuropathology, and pathogenesis. In: Stoker TB, Greenland JC, editors. Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis and clinical aspects. Brisbane: Codon Publications; 2018. p. 3–26.
  • Sveinbjornsdottir S. The clinical symptoms of Parkinson's disease. J Neurochem. 2016;139(Suppl 1):318–24. doi:10.1111/jnc.13691
  • Schrag A, Jahanshahi M, Quinn N. What contributes to quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2000;69(3):308–12. doi:10.1136/jnnp.69.3.308
  • Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):896–912. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3
  • GBD 2016. Parkinson's disease collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson's disease, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):939–53. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30295-3
  • GBD 2015. Neurological disorders collaborator group. global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(11):877–97. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30299-5
  • Yang W, Hamilton JL, Kopil C, et al. Current and projected future economic burden of Parkinson’s disease in the U.S. NPJ Parkinson's Disease. 2020;6(1):15. doi:10.1038/s41531-020-0117-1
  • Ou Z, Pan J, Tang S, et al. Global trends in the incidence, prevalence, and years lived With disability of Parkinson's disease in 204 countries/territories from 1990 to 2019 [original research]. Front Public Health. 2021;9. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.776847.
  • Prenger MTM, Madray R, Van Hedger K, et al. Social symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s Disease. 2020;2020:8846544. doi:10.1155/2020/8846544.
  • Rodríguez-Violante M, Camacho-Ordoñez A, Cervantes-Arriaga A, et al. Factors associated with the quality of life of subjects with Parkinson's disease and burden on their caregivers. Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain). 2015;30(5):257–63. doi:10.1016/j.nrl.2014.01.008
  • Perpiñá-Galvañ J, Orts-Beneito N, Fernández-Alcántara M, et al. Level of burden and health-related quality of life in caregivers of palliative care patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(23):4806. doi:10.3390/ijerph16234806.
  • Zahoor I, Shafi A, Haq E. Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson’s disease. In: Stoker TB, Greenland JC, editors. Parkinson's disease: pathogenesis and clinical aspects. Brisbane: Codon Publications; 2018. p. 129–144.
  • Whitfield AC, Moore BT, Daniels RN. Classics in chemical neuroscience: levodopa. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2014;5(12):1192–7. doi:10.1021/cn5001759
  • Beckers M, Bloem BR, Verbeek MM. Mechanisms of peripheral levodopa resistance in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2022;8(1):56. doi:10.1038/s41531-022-00321-y
  • Pigott JS, Kane EJ, Ambler G, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness of self-management interventions in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):45. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02656-2
  • Ernst M, Folkerts AK, Gollan R, et al. Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;1(1):Cd013856. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub2.
  • Rocca WA. The burden of Parkinson's disease: a worldwide perspective. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):928–9. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30355-7
  • Russell RD, Black LJ, Begley A. Nutrition education programs for adults with neurological diseases Are lacking: A scoping review. Nutrients. 2022;14(8):1577. doi:10.3390/nu14081577.
  • Barbaresko J, Lellmann AW, Schmidt A, et al. Dietary factors and neurodegenerative disorders: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective studies. Adv Nutr. 2020;11(5):1161–73. doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa053
  • Hong CT, Chan L, Bai CH. The effect of caffeine on the risk and progression of Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12(6):1860.
  • Seidl SE, Santiago JA, Bilyk H, et al. The emerging role of nutrition in Parkinson's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6(36):36. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00036.
  • Jiménez-Jiménez FJ, Alonso-Navarro H, García-Martín E, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2019;266(8):1821–34. doi:10.1007/s00415-018-9032-3
  • Tamtaji OR, Taghizadeh M, Aghadavod E, et al. The effects of omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin E co-supplementation on gene expression related to inflammation, insulin and lipid in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019;176:116–21. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.12.006
  • Chang MC, Kwak SG, Kwak S. Effect of dietary vitamins C and E on the risk of Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(6):3922–30. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.05.011
  • Shen L. Associations between B vitamins and Parkinson's disease. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):7197–208. doi:10.3390/nu7095333
  • Talebi S, Ghoreishy SM, Jayedi A, et al. Dietary antioxidants and risk of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Adv Nutr. 2022;13(5):1493–504. doi:10.1093/advances/nmac001
  • Jang CH, Oh J, Lim JS, et al. Fermented Soy products: beneficial potential in neurodegenerative diseases. Foods. 2021;10(3):636. doi:10.3390/foods10030636.
  • Cheng P, Yu J, Huang W, et al. Dietary intake of iron, zinc, copper, and risk of Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2015;36(12):2269–75. doi:10.1007/s10072-015-2349-0
  • Boelens Keun JT, Arnoldussen IA, Vriend C, et al. Dietary approaches to improve efficacy and control side effects of levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(6):2265–87. doi:10.1093/advances/nmab060
  • Boulos C, Yaghi N, El Hayeck R, et al. Nutritional risk factors, microbiota and Parkinson's disease: what is the current evidence? Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1896. doi:10.3390/nu11081896.
  • Nielsen SD, Pearson NM, Seidler K. The link between the gut microbiota and Parkinson's disease: A systematic mechanism review with focus on α-synuclein transport. Brain Res. 2021;1769:147609. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147609
  • Nuzum ND, Loughman A, Szymlek-Gay EA, et al. Gut microbiota differences between healthy older adults and individuals with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;112:227–41. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.02.003
  • Marć MA, Jastrząb R, Mytych J. Does the gut microbial metabolome really matter? The connection between GUT metabolome and neurological disorders. Nutrients. 2022;14:3967. DOI:10.3390/nu14193967
  • Nag N, Jelinek GA. A narrative review of lifestyle factors associated with Parkinson's disease risk and progression. Neurodegener Dis. 2019;19(2):51–9. doi:10.1159/000502292
  • Liu YH, Jensen GL, Na M, et al. Diet quality and risk of Parkinson's disease: A prospective study and meta-analysis. J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(1):337–47. doi:10.3233/JPD-202290
  • Trichopoulou A, Martínez-González MA, Tong TYN, et al. Definitions and potential health benefits of the Mediterranean diet: views from experts around the world. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):112. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-12-112
  • Morris MC, Tangney CC, Wang Y, et al. MIND diet slows cognitive decline with aging. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(9):1015–22. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.011
  • Agarwal P, Wang Y, Buchman AS, et al. MIND diet associated with reduced incidence and delayed progression of ParkinsonismA in Old Age. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(10):1211–5. doi:10.1007/s12603-018-1094-5
  • Metcalfe-Roach A, Yu AC, Golz EC, Mihai C, et al. MIND and Mediterranean diets associated with later onset of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2021;36(4):977–84. doi:10.1002/mds.28464.
  • Hosking DE, Eramudugolla R, Cherbuin N, et al. MIND not Mediterranean diet related to 12-year incidence of cognitive impairment in an Australian longitudinal cohort study. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(4):581–9. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.12.011.
  • Solch RJ, Aigbogun JO, Voyiadjis AG, et al. Mediterranean diet adherence, gut microbiota, and Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease risk: a systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2022;434:120166. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2022.120166
  • Knight E, Geetha T, Burnett D, et al. The role of diet and dietary patterns in Parkinson's disease. Nutrients. 2022;14(21):4472. doi:10.3390/nu14214472.
  • Masood W, Annamaraju P, Uppaluri KR. Ketogenic diet. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022; [updated]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499830/.
  • Pavón S, Lázaro E, Martínez O, et al. Ketogenic diet and cognition in neurological diseases: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2021;79(7):802–13. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuaa113
  • Christensen MG, Damsgaard J, Fink-Jensen A. Use of ketogenic diets in the treatment of central nervous system diseases: a systematic review. Nord J Psychiatry. 2021;75(1):1–8. doi:10.1080/08039488.2020.1795924
  • Crosby L, Davis B, Joshi S, et al. Ketogenic diets and chronic disease: weighing the benefits against the risks [review]. Front Nutr. 2021;8:702802. doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.702802.
  • Ma K, Xiong N, Shen Y, et al. Weight loss and malnutrition in patients with Parkinson's disease: current knowledge and future prospects. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10(1). doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00001.
  • Ongun N. Does nutritional status affect Parkinson's disease features and quality of life? PLOS ONE. 2018;13(10):e0205100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205100
  • Sheard JM, Ash S, Mellick GD, et al. Improved nutritional status is related to improved quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Neurol. 2014;14(1):212. doi:10.1186/s12883-014-0212-1
  • Pereira J, de Queiroz Júnior JR, de Medeiros LC, et al. Sarcopenia and dynapenia is correlated to worse quality of life perception in middle-aged and older adults with Parkinson's disease. Nutr Neurosci. 2023: 1–9. doi:10.1080/1028415X.2023.2190246
  • Rajiah K, Maharajan MK, Yeen SJ, et al. Quality of life and caregivers’ burden of Parkinson's disease. Neuroepidemiology. 2017;48(3-4):131–7. doi:10.1159/000479031
  • Sheard JM, Ash S, Mellick GD, et al. Malnutrition in a sample of community-dwelling people with Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e53290. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053290
  • Riggare S, Höglund PJ, Hvitfeldt Forsberg H, et al. Patients are doing it for themselves: A survey on disease-specific knowledge acquisition among people with Parkinson's disease in Sweden. Health Informatics J. 2019;25(1):91–105. doi:10.1177/1460458217704248
  • Kantor D, Bright JR, Burtchell J. Perspectives from the patient and the healthcare professional in multiple sclerosis: social media and patient education. Neurol Ther. 2018;7(1):23–36. doi:10.1007/s40120-017-0087-3
  • Wicks P, Stamford J, Grootenhuis MA, et al. Innovations in e-health. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(1):195–203. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0458-x
  • Chou WS, Oh A, Klein WMP. Addressing health-related misinformation on social media. Jama. 2018;320(23):2417–8. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.16865
  • Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. doi:10.7326/M18-0850
  • Garousi V, Felderer M, Mäntylä MV. Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering. Inf Softw Technol. 2019;106:101–21. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.09.006
  • Schöpfel J. Towards a Prague definition of grey literature. Twelfth International Conference on Grey Literature: Transparency in Grey Literature. Grey Tech Approaches to High Tech Issues; 2010 Dec 6–7; Prague, Czech Republic. https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00581570/document; https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00581570/file/GL_12_Schopfel_v5.2.pdf.
  • The EndNote Team. Endnote [64 bit]. EndNote 20. Philadelphia, PA: Clarivate; 2013.
  • Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; ND.
  • Phillips MCL, Murtagh DKJ, Gilbertson LJ, et al. Low-fat versus ketogenic diet in Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2018;33(8):1306–14. doi:10.1002/mds.27390
  • Tidman MM, White D, White T. Effects of an low carbohydrate/healthy fat/ketogenic diet on biomarkers of health and symptoms, anxiety and depression in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2022;12(2):57–66. doi:10.2217/nmt-2021-0033
  • Krikorian R, Shidler MD, Summer SS, et al. Nutritional ketosis for mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: A controlled pilot trial. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2019;1:41–7. doi:10.1016/j.prdoa.2019.07.006.
  • Koyuncu H, Fidan V, Toktas H, et al. Effect of ketogenic diet versus regular diet on voice quality of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Belg. 2021;121(6):1729–32. doi:10.1007/s13760-020-01486-0
  • Lawrie S, Coe S, Mansoubi M, et al. Dietary patterns and nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A cross-sectional analysis. J Am Nutr. Assoc. 2022;42(4):1–10. doi:10.1080/07315724.2022.2056544.
  • Molsberry S, Bjornevik K, Hughes KC, et al. Diet pattern and prodromal features of Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2020;95(15):e2095. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000010523
  • Sääksjärvi K, Knekt P, Lundqvist A, et al. A cohort study on diet and the risk of Parkinson's disease: the role of food groups and diet quality. Br J Nutr. 2013;109(2):329–37. doi:10.1017/S0007114512000955
  • Mischley LK, Lau RC, Bennett RD. Role of diet and nutritional supplements in Parkinson’s disease progression. Oxid Med Cell Longevity. 2017;2017:6405278. doi:10.1155/2017/6405278
  • Alcalay RN, Gu Y, Mejia-Santana H, et al. The association between Mediterranean diet adherence and Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2012;27(6):771–4. doi:10.1002/mds.24918.
  • Barichella M, Cereda E, Cassani E, et al. Dietary habits and neurological features of Parkinson's disease patients: implications for practice. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(4):1054–61. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.020
  • Belingheri M, Chiu Y-HM, Renzetti S, et al. Relationships of nutritional factors and agrochemical exposure with Parkinson’s disease in the Province of Brescia, Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3309. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063309
  • Cassani E, Barichella M, Ferri V, et al. Dietary habits in Parkinson's disease: adherence to Mediterranean diet. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;42:40–6. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.06.007
  • Torti M, Fossati C, Casali M, et al. Effect of family history, occupation and diet on the risk of Parkinson disease: A case-control study. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0243612. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243612
  • Coe S, Spruzen S, Sanchez C, et al. A cross-sectional feasibility study of nutrient intake patterns in people With Parkinson’s compared to government nutrition guidelines. J Am Coll Nutr. 2020;39(3):187–91. doi:10.1080/07315724.2019.1633440
  • Sauerbier A, Schrag A, Martinez-Martin P, et al. Dietary variations in a multiethnic Parkinson’s disease cohort and possible influences on nonmotor aspects: a cross-sectional multicentre study. Parkinson’s Disease. 2018;2018:7274085. doi:10.1155/2018/7274085.
  • Kyrozis A, Ghika A, Stathopoulos P, et al. Dietary and lifestyle variables in relation to incidence of Parkinson’s disease in Greece. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(1):67–77. doi:10.1007/s10654-012-9760-0
  • Maraki MI, Yannakoulia M, Stamelou M, et al. Mediterranean diet adherence is related to reduced probability of prodromal Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2019;34(1):48–57. doi:10.1002/mds.27489.
  • Paknahad Z, Sheklabadi E, Derakhshan Y, et al. The effect of the Mediterranean diet on cognitive function in patients with Parkinson’s disease: A randomized clinical controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2020;50:102366. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102366
  • Paknahad Z, Sheklabadi E, Moravejolahkami AR, et al. The effects of Mediterranean diet on severity of disease and serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a single center, randomized controlled trial. Nutr Neurosci. 2022;25(2):313–20. doi:10.1080/1028415X.2020.1751509
  • Palavra NC, Lubomski M, Flood VM, et al. Increased added sugar consumption Is common in Parkinson's disease. Front Nutr. 2021;8(628845):628845. doi:10.3389/fnut.2021.628845.
  • Baert F, Matthys C, Mellaerts R, et al. Dietary intake of Parkinson's disease patients. Front Nutr. 2020;7(105):105. doi:10.3389/fnut.2020.00105.
  • Fukushima T, Tan X, Luo Y, et al. Nutritional effects on depressive symptoms in Parkinson’s disease patients. ESPEN J. 2012;7(2):e64–e68. doi:10.1016/j.clnme.2012.02.002.
  • Hegelmaier T, Lebbing M, Duscha A, et al. Interventional influence of the intestinal microbiome through dietary intervention and bowel cleansing might improve motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Cells. 2020;9(2):376. doi:10.3390/cells9020376
  • Barichella M, Akpalu A, Cham M, et al. Nutritional status and dietary habits in Parkinson’s disease patients in Ghana. Nutrition. 2013;29(2):470–3. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2012.09.017
  • Gupta V, Garg RK, Pant KK, et al. A study on risk factors for Parkinson׳s disease in Indian population. Bioinformation. 2014;10(6):342–6. doi:10.6026/97320630010342
  • Okubo H, Miyake Y, Sasaki S, et al. Dietary patterns and risk of Parkinson’s disease: a case–control study in Japan. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(5):681–8. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03600.x.
  • Navarro-Meza M, Gabriel-Ortiz G, Pacheco-Moisés FP, et al. Dietary fat and antioxidant vitamin intake in patients of neurodegenerative disease in a rural region of Jalisco, Mexico. Nutr Neurosci. 2014;17(6):260–7. doi:10.1179/1476830513Y.0000000089
  • Strikwerda AJ, Dommershuijsen LJ, Ikram MK, et al. Diet quality and risk of Parkinson's disease: the Rotterdam Study. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):3970. doi:10.3390/nu13113970.
  • Zapała B, Stefura T, Milewicz T, et al. The role of the western diet and oral microbiota in Parkinson's disease. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):355. doi:10.3390/nu14020355.
  • Yin W, Löf M, Pedersen NL, et al. Mediterranean dietary pattern at middle age and risk of Parkinson's disease: a Swedish cohort study. Mov Disord. 2021;36(1):255–60. doi:10.1002/mds.28314.
  • National Institutes of Health. Parkinson’s Disease: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatments US: NIH; 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/parkinsons-disease
  • Health Direct Australia. Parkinson's Disease Australia: Health Direct Australia; 2021 [cited 2022 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/parkinsons-disease
  • Williamson G. The role of polyphenols in modern nutrition. Nutr Bull. 2017;42(3):226–35. doi:10.1111/nbu.12278
  • Holscher HD. Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2017;8(2):172–84. doi:10.1080/19490976.2017.1290756
  • Chang KH, Chen CM. The role of oxidative stress in Parkinson's disease. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(7):597. doi:10.3390/antiox9070597.
  • Park H-A, Ellis AC. Dietary antioxidants and Parkinson's disease. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;9(7):750. doi:10.3390/antiox9070570.
  • Swann OG, Kilpatrick M, Breslin M, et al. Dietary fiber and its associations with depression and inflammation. Nutr Rev. 2020;78(5):394–411. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuz072
  • Nuzum ND, Szymlek-Gay EA, Loke S, et al. Differences in the gut microbiome across typical ageing and in Parkinson's disease. Neuropharmacology. 2023;235:109566. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109566
  • Stocchi F, Torti M. Chapter twenty-seven - constipation in Parkinson's disease. In: Chaudhuri KR, Titova N, editors. International review of neurobiology. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2017. p. 811–26.
  • Barichella M, Cereda E, Pezzoli G. Major nutritional issues in the management of Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2009;24(13):1881–92. doi:10.1002/mds.22705.
  • Scorza FA, de Almeida AG, Scorza CA, et al. Water intake in Parkinson's disease: addressing a neglected problem. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022;34(12):3161–2. doi:10.1007/s40520-022-02228-3
  • Virmani T, Tazan S, Mazzoni P, et al. Motor fluctuations due to interaction between dietary protein and levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Mov Disord. 2016;3(1):8. doi:10.1186/s40734-016-0036-9
  • Kempster PA, Perju-Dumbrava L. The thermodynamic consequences of Parkinson's disease [review]. Front Neurol. 2021;12:685314. doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.685314.
  • Kacprzyk KW, Milewska M, Zarnowska A, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2022;14(23):5194. doi:10.3390/nu14235194.
  • De Rui M, Inelmen EM, Trevisan C, et al. Parkinson’s disease and the non-motor symptoms: hyposmia, weight loss, osteosarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32(7):1211–8. doi:10.1007/s40520-020-01470-x
  • Bril A, Perez-Lloret S, Rossi M, et al. A multifactorial study on nutritional status, binge eating and physical activity as main factors directly influencing body weight in Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Parkinson's Disease. 2017;3(1):17. doi:10.1038/s41531-017-0018-0