Effects of aeration on water quality in agricultural reservoirs in the northern Great Plains

Abstract

Lerminiaux J, Norton B, Wilson RJ, Rimas R, Lavender TM, Finlay K. 2024. Effects of aeration on water quality in agricultural reservoirs in the northern Great Plains. Lake Reserv Manage. XX:XXX–XX.

Aeration of agricultural reservoirs is an encouraged practice in the northern Great Plains of Canada as it can improve water quality by reducing pathogenic bacteria and algal abundance. Cattle also prefer aerated water, resulting in greater weight gain. Despite its known benefits, agricultural reservoir aeration is still not uniformly adopted, largely given its cost of installation and maintenance. Wind powered aeration has been shown to be an eco-friendly and sustainable way to increase oxygen levels in agricultural reservoirs, but the mechanisms by which this aeration can improve water quality are not well documented. By comparing 5 aerated agricultural reservoirs to 5 unaerated agricultural reservoirs, we evaluated whether wind-powered aeration improves water quality. We measured dissolved oxygen, nitrogen, and phosphorus, algal biomass (as chlorophyll a), cyanobacteria abundance, and algal toxins (microcystin, anatoxin-a, and β-N-methylamino-L-alanine) in the aerated and unaerated agricultural reservoirs on a weekly basis over a 12-week period from mid June through August 2022. We found that the aerators were able to mix the water column and add oxygen to deeper regions of the agricultural reservoir, but this did not result in consistent improvements to any measured water quality parameter. The observed lack of a strong response to aeration suggests that this practice may provide only minimal water quality benefits, but aeration may still prove beneficial for deep (>2 m) and sheltered agricultural reservoirs that do not regularly mix from wind effects alone.

Keywords:

• Algal toxins
• cyanobacteria
• livestock health
• northern Great Plains
• water quality
• wind-powered aeration

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ministry of Agriculture and the pasture manager at the Regina Beach Provincial Pasture for their assistance with this project, and the Finlay Lab field crew for their sampling work. We also acknowledge that this study was conducted on Treaty 4 lands with a presence in Treaty 6. These are the territories of the nêhiyawak, Anihšināpēk, Dakota, Lakota, and Nakoda, and the homeland of the Métis/Michif Nation.

Disclosure statement

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Funding

Funding was provided by the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture’s Strategic Field Program to K. Finlay.