23
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Psychomotor skills assessment in healthcare education: a scoping review

, , , , , , , & show all
Received 08 Aug 2023, Accepted 24 Apr 2024, Published online: 08 May 2024
 

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Healthcare education presents challenges as students need to demonstrate competence of psychomotor skills prior to performance with patients. Evaluating teaching methods and assessment for performance is needed to ensure skill competency. Proficiency with psychomotor skills is essential for practicing as a healthcare provider; however, there is little consensus on the best methods to teach or assess psychomotor skills. This scoping review aimed to review the available literature on psychomotor skill acquisition within healthcare education and summarize the key concepts for teaching psychomotor skills.

Materials/Methods

A scoping review was conducted using multiple databases focusing on psychomotor skills, learning, and healthcare education. Inclusion criteria included English language research studies published since 2000 that explored instruction, development, or attainment of psychomotor skills. Exclusion criteria included communication skills, radiology interpretation, invasive procedures, and skills not part of professional training.

Results

The review included 86 studies from varying professions. The articles were divided into two concepts: assessment tools/techniques (15) and instructional methods (71). For the instructional methods group, categories of instructor led (13), peer-assisted learning (7), multimedia (23), simulation (11), and others (17) were identified. Instructional design research types included 14 review articles, 21 studies with multiple cohorts or randomized design, and 38 studies with a single cohort design.

Conclusions

This scoping review determined two main takeaways. 1- There are inconsistent research design methodologies and low evidence levels used within this research area. 2- Several emerging concepts can be found, but caution is needed due to the low quality of the research.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the East Tennessee State Universities Department of Rehab Sciences for providing funding for a Covidence license to complete this scoping review.

Disclosure statement

No declaration of interest to report.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 326.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.