198
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Report

The Spanish wells: Freshwater lenses and the Florida Keys

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 229-247 | Received 10 Sep 2021, Accepted 17 Dec 2021, Published online: 02 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

The Florida Keys comprise a unique ecological and archaeological setting in the southeastern United States yet have remained relatively understudied archaeologically for much of the twentieth century. Anecdotal accounts of “Spanish wells,” employed by sailors and settlers during the colonial and early modern eras, have long posed questions about the availability of freshwater resources to Indigenous communities in the islands and how this availability may have impacted settlement patterns. Herein, we conduct the first systematic investigation of the “Spanish wells” in English-language historical records and compare their descriptions and locations to those of known Indigenous archaeological sites in the archipelago. In total, 22 distinct water sources in and near the Keys were attested to in documents and personal accounts from 1601 CE to 2021 CE. Geospatial analysis of their distribution relative to local archaeological sites returned few statistically significant results, however, likely influenced by the extensive history of site loss in the region. While the exact nature of most “wells” remains unclear, descriptions of their reliability and their broad spatial distribution bolsters the possibility of these water resources supporting year-round Indigenous communities in the archipelago prior to colonization. Future investigation focused on the identified water sources could shed further light on their exact nature and possible exploitation by Indigenous communities.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff of the University of Miami Richter Library and Keys History & Discovery Center for their assistance in accessing collections while also navigating the challenges of public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors likewise wish to thank the members of the Matecumbe Chiefdom Project for their support of this research, and Dr. John Worth and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments on this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no potential competing interests.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 191.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.