ABSTRACT
Objectives
During the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, clinicians recommended awake-prone positioning (APP) to avoid the worst outcomes. The objectives of this study were to investigate if APP reduces intubation, death rates, and hospital length of stay (HLOS) in acute COVID-19.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort with non-mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized in a reference center in Manaus, Brazil, 2020. Participants were stratified into APP and awake-not-prone positioning (ANPP) groups. Also, we conducted a systematic review and performed a meta-analysis to understand if this intervention had different outcomes in resource-limited settings (PROSPERO CRD42023422452).
Results
A total of 115 participants were allocated into the groups. There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding time to intubation (HR: 0.861; 95CI: 0.474-1.1562; p=0.622) and time to death (HR: 1.666; 95CI: 0.939-2.951; p=0.081). APP was not significantly associated with reduced HLOS. A total of 86 articles were included in the systematic review, of which 76 (88,3%) show similar findings after APP. Also, low/middle, and high-income countries were similar regarding such outcomes.
Conclusion
APP in COVID-19 does not present clinical improvement that affects mortality, intubation rate and HLOS. The lack of a prone position protocol, obtained through a controlled study, is necessary. After 3 years, APP benefits are still inconclusive.
Declarations of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
Author contributions
RS Freire, CMSS Barros, AGR Santos, FH Fonseca, ST Saenz, AS Dias, E Fernandes, J Valente, N Cubas-Vega, C Luz da Goulart, V Sampaio, M Simão, D Baía-da-Silva, FE Martinez-Espinosa, and F Val participated in study conception and design; RS Freire, CMSS Barros, AGR Santos, FH Fonseca, ST Saenz, AS Dias, M Simão were responsible for collecting and reviewing patient data from the HPSDRAA; RS Freire, CMSS Barros and J Valente were responsible for the systematic review; RS Freire, CMSS Barros, C Luz da Goulart, F Val, R Severin and J Valente were responsible for the manuscript writing; N Cubas-Vega, C Luz da Goulart, D Baía-da-Silva, R Gonçalves Mendes, G Peixoto Tinoco Arêas, R Severin, R Lins Gonçalves, FE Martinez-Espinosa, and F Val critically reviewed the manuscript; MGA Ro-drigues, B Maia Silva, and V Sampaio were responsible for the statistical analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available upon request to the corresponding author.
Supplementary material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2350587.