ABSTRACT
Background
Resource-limited communities across the globe face dramatic health disparities augmented by the shortcomings of translating research into practice. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) empowers communities through research and engagement to generate knowledge and improve global oral health. This case study presents findings and methods from a CBPR oral health project with an Indigenous Community in Costa Rica (La Casona).
Methods
Interviews were conducted with public health dentists, community stakeholders, and community health leaders. Qualitative content and direct coding analysis of 8 interview transcripts was used to develop initial themes. Initial themes were grouped into final themes with representative quotations with framework analysis.
Results
Final themes identified included health education, financial status, structural influences on health, diet and nutrition, sociocultural characteristics, and environmental factors. Community partners guided development of a conceptual framework identifying common protective factors and common risk factors for oral health in La Casona.
Conclusion
This study is an example of CBPR that explores interconnected determinants of oral health in La Casona and uniquely identifies common protective factors in addition to common risk factors for oral health.
Practical Implications
Dental practitioners can apply the CBPR principles applied for this study in other clinical and research initiatives to better align with the WHO Strategic Objectives.
Introduction
The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Strategy on Oral Health and WHO Global Oral Health Action Plan (2023–2030) emphasize guiding principles and strategic objectives to achieve the vision of, “oral health for all individuals and communities by 2030.”Citation1,Citation2 Part of the strategic objectives include an emphasis on oral health governance, promotion, disease prevention, and research. Achieving oral health for all individuals requires an understanding of the nuances of individuals and communities through research. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is one way to understand these nuances to achieve oral health through engaging and empowering communities. CBPR prioritizes developing partnerships directly with stakeholders to drive the research process.Citation3–6 CBPR consists of the following stages: determining contexts with local partners, developing group dynamics and equitable partnerships, developing and implementing interventions and research, and assessing and evaluating outcomes.Citation3 CBPR has been described with different names in the literature, including participatory research, participatory action research, action science, action inquiry, cooperative inquiry, participatory evaluation, and empowerment evaluation.Citation7,Citation8 CBPR enhances the usefulness, validity, quality, and relevance of research by utilizing community partner local knowledge and lived experience.Citation7,Citation9 Some challenges of CBPR include lack of trust, power inequity, cultural and value differences, and difficulty proving intervention success.Citation7 The following project is a case study from Costa Rica of applying CBPR principles to global oral health. Its purpose is to engage local stakeholders input to analyze the risk and protective factors contributing to community-wide oral health.
Context
Interamerican Center for Global Health/Centro Interamericano para la Salud Global (CISG) is an international academic research and education center in Costa Rica. In 2016, collaborators from CISG and Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) worked to develop educational programs for trainees. The collaboration resulted in an innovative experiential global health course hosted in Costa Rica. The experiential course, called Global Health Extension Course: Perspectives from Costa Rica, was a five-day elective intensive course in rural Costa Rica building on competencies and themes from a didactic global health course at HSDM.Citation10,Citation11 Course participants (authors DOD and RL) connected with public health dentist (author GABM) who works directly and serves indigenous communities throughout La Casona. Author GABM spent years building rapport with community leaders, including authors DBP and MBB, through informal collaborations and through his work with Hands for Health (H4H). H4H is a local Costa Rican non-governmental organization (NGO) that recruits local health professionals and health promoters to focus on improving the health of the communities in the Coto Brus region of Costa Rica. This case study presents findings from a CBPR oral health project with an indigenous community in Costa Rica called La Casona.
La Casona is a community within the Coto Brus Indigenous Territory which extends near the frontier between Costa Rica and Panama. Most of the Ngäbe-Buglé people live in small villages dispersed throughout the region.Citation12 La Casona is in the Coto Brus canton of the Puntarenas province in southeastern Costa Rica, about 40 kilometers from the Costa Rican-Panamanian border. Though the Ngäbe-Buglé are Indigenous to Costa Rica and Panama, the Echandi-Fernandez Treaty in 1941 established the border without considering the Indigenous populations.Citation12 There are five Ngäbe-Buglé territories in Costa Rica (Coto Brus, Abrojo Montezuma, Altos de San Antonio, Alto Laguna de Osa and Conte Burica).Citation13 The Indigenous territory of Coto Brus has a population of about 2,500 Ngäbe-Buglé, with approximately 370 living in La Casona community.Citation14 However, most Ngäbe-Buglé people, about 170,000, live in Panama.Citation12 During the coffee harvest season beginning in September, families will typically travel from Panama to work in Costa Rica.Citation12 Temperatures average around 23 degrees Celsius throughout the year, and there is normally a rainy season from May to December and a dry period in March and April.Citation14 Roads connect La Casona to other communities in Coto Brus; yet, the roads significantly deteriorate during the rainy season.Citation14 The Ngäbe-Buglé share a strong traditional culture, adhere to two Indigenous languages, Ngäbere and Buglere or Bokotá, and utilize a traditional kinship system in reference to grandparents.Citation13 It is a patriarchal culture and women often give birth to their first child between age 13–17.Citation14 Most of the population practice Catholicism or an Indigenous religion known as Mama Tata or Mama Chi.Citation14 Within La Casona, there is a health center clinic staffed by physicians, traditional healers, dentists, and other health care providers as part of the Costa Rican “Equipos Básicos de Atención Integral en Salud” (EBAIS) health system. EBAIS is also used to refer to the individual health clinic.
Methods
Project Planning
The case study began when project authors discussed possibilities to contribute to H4H initiatives in La Casona. Prior to traveling to Costa Rica for the course, the first step of a CBPR approach was utilized by partnering with community stakeholders from La Casona to determine the research context. Determining the research context included defining a research question, creating an interview guide, developing a conceptual framework, and assessing determinants of oral health in La Casona. In 2017, H4H launched a public health educational initiative called, “Oral Health Protection Program for Vulnerable Indigenous Population of Coto Brus,” to improve oral health in the Ngäbe-Buglé population. H4H utilizes strong relationships with community leaders, health care providers, traditional healers, and families built over years to provide culturally-sensitive dental care and oral health education that respects community traditions.
Project authors collaborated over numerous video conferences and e-mail communications, as well as review of existing oral health reports, government sources, policy papers and reports gray literature by local NGOs to complete an environmental analysis of La Casona. This initial review served as a basis for an interview guide prior to the entire team convening in Costa Rica.
A standard written informed consent (Appendix 2) was developed for study participants in their preferred language (Spanish or English). This project was reviewed and approved by both the Harvard Institutional Review Board and the Centro de Desarrollo Estratégico e Información en Salud y Seguridad Social (CENDEISSS) prior to attending the course. CENDEISSS is a department of the Costa Rican Social Security Fund (Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, CCSS) which oversees health research and bioethics topics of the public health services in Costa Rica.
Development of Interview Guide, Feedback from Stakeholders and Project Team
Continued discussions with project partners and a literature review of existing oral health models facilitated the development of a semi-structured interview guide.Citation15–19 The interview guide (Appendix 1) was designed with multiple revisions with project partners to understand the determinants of oral health with closed-ended and open-ended questions. The questions examined day-to-day life in the community, family activities, typical diet and food sources, oral health knowledge, top factors contributing to caries, health care system characteristics for medical and dental care, and potential changes that can be implemented in the community. The interview guide was pilot-tested with three stakeholders before conducting the interviews.
Travelled to Coto Brus Region, Conducted and Audio Recorded In-Person Interviews
Interviews were conducted with stakeholders who included community organization leaders, regional public health leaders, dentists, physicians, and Cultural Advisors. Cultural Advisors are Indigenous community members that serve as liaisons between the community and Costa Rican non-governmental and governmental organizations. Cultural Advisors serve as interpreters for Indigenous languages and provide sociocultural, interpersonal, and other support to community members.
The interviews were conducted in a semi-structured format to explore local determinants of oral health in the participants’ preferred language. A total of seven hours of interviews were conducted and audio recorded with seven key stakeholders recorded. Due to the small size of the community, we determined saturation point had been reached after stakeholder interview responses became repetitive. The interviews were transcribed with a transcription service. The Spanish interview transcripts were translated to English with a translation service.
Results
Defining Final Themes of Oral Health Determinants
Using qualitative content and open thematic analysis, several initial themes were identified within the transcripts.Citation20 The interview transcripts were reviewed again and quotations relevant to the initial themes were identified. Codes and subcodes from the quotations were identified with conventional coding analysis.Citation20 These quotations were hand-coded independently by two authors with a third author as a tie-breaker. The codes were grouped into final themes. A combination of final themes, codes, and subcodes were integrated into a framework for determinants of oral health in La Casona. Final themes of health education, financial status, structural influences on health, diet and nutrition, environmental factors and socio-cultural characteristics were identified (presented in ).
Creating the “Framework for Analyzing Protective and Risk Factors for Oral Health Designed for La Casona”
The six final themes were used to create the Framework for Analyzing Protective and Risk Factors for Oral Health Designed for La Casona (). Field notes, observation, journaling, and project team debriefing supplemented the interview results with additional context and detail. After the initial framework was developed, multiple revisions of the framework were completed with project partners. The framework was also shared with additional stakeholders and community leaders for further feedback. The framework’s function is to serve as a lens for analyzing risk factors and protective factors for oral health in La Casona. Protective factors identified include presence of a community health center known as an EBAIS, money from government subsidies and other income sources, community engagement with health organizations, school-based meal programs and local produce. Risk factors include challenges with health care system structure, access, lack of oral health knowledge, cheap accessible cariogenic foods, and lack of access to oral hygiene materials.
Discussion
Previous research on determinants of oral health in different community settings identifies risk factors for oral disease and utilizes a common risk factors approach to address oral disease.Citation21–23 Community-based interventions utilizing a common risk factors approach targets lifestyle factors, such as unhealthy diet, that increase risk for oral disease and also increases risk for other diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease.Citation22 The CBPR process in this study identified protective factors in La Casona that can be targeted for interventions to promote positive health outcomes, beyond common risk factors focused on previous studies in the literature. Our conceptual framework suggests that a unique combined common protective and common risk factor approach can inform community-level interventions in La Casona to target multiple interconnected health conditions such as tooth decay, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Without an understanding of La Casona’s unique historical and sociocultural context, interventions for oral health and overall health will unlikely reach their full potential. By utilizing the conceptual framework developed through this project, community interventions could target common protective factors such as the local health center (EBAIS), school meal programs, locally-grown nutritious food, sources of income including government subsidies and informal work, integration of cultural beliefs and traditional healers, access to drinking water, and engagement with community health organizations. Possible interventions could include nutrition education and agricultural initiatives which facilitate the cultivation of community, school, and family gardens. Common risk factors include transportation and geographic barriers for some families despite the presence of an EBAIS. Even with increased attention to oral health education, there still exists gaps in oral health and nutrition literacy. Additionally, cheap cariogenic foods are often convenient and purchased using government cash subsidies. Furthermore, lack of access to oral hygiene materials contributes to the progression of oral disease.
Conclusion
This study serves as an application of CBPR. In alignment with the WHO Global Strategy on Oral Health and Oral Health Action Plan, this project explores interconnected determinants of oral health in La Casona through stakeholder-driven research. Assessing both protective and risk factors is important in understanding community oral health. The complexity of community-level factors that influence oral health in a community such as La Casona demonstrates the value of CBPR. Practitioners can utilize this approach for other communities. With increased importance on empowering individual local providers and resources to improve oral health, CBPR principles have never been more important for dental public health.
Acknowledgments
Thank you to our partners and community members of Coto Brus and La Casona as teachers, colleagues, and friends, for whom this project exists. Gratitude to Dr. Christine Riedy for her guidance in data analysis. Special thanks to the Abundance Foundation, HSDM Office of Global and Community Health and Associate Dean Jane Barrow, and Dogon Fund for supporting travel to Costa Rica for DOD and RL.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Funding
The work was supported by the Abundance Foundation Harvard School of Dental Medicine [Office of Global and Community Health, Dogon Fund].
Supplementary Data
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2024.2330558.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
David O. Danesh
David O. Danesh, DMD, MPH, MS, is a pediatric dentist, Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor at The Ohio State University and a pediatric dental attending at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Ryan Lisann
Ryan Lisann, DMD, EdM, is a pediatric dentist and lecturer at Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Carlos A. Faerron-Guzman
Carlos A. Faerron-Guzman, MD, MSC, is director of the Centro Interamericano para la Salud Global (CISG) in Costa Rica and Associate Professor, Graduate School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Gustavo A. Bermúdez Mora
Gustavo A. Bermúdez Mora, DDS, is a public health dentist and Regional Supervisor of Dentistry in the Directorate of Integrated Health Service Delivery Network of the Brunca Region at the Costa Rican Social Security Fund (CCSS). Dr. Bermúdez Mora is a member of the Collective Oral Health Commission at the Colegio de Cirujanos Dentistas de Costa Rica.
Dominga Bejarano-Palacios
Dominga Bejarano-Palacios is a former Local Indigenous Midwife and an Indigenous Leader of the Elderly Women Group in La Casona Indigenous Territory of Coto Brus, Costa Rica.
Mérita Bejarano-Bejarano
Merita Bejarano-Bejarano is a Local Indigenous Cultural Advisor in La Casona Indigenous Territory of Coto Brus, Costa Rica.
References
- World Health Organization. Draft Global Strategy On Oral Health (WHO WHA 75.10, Add 1, Annex 3). 2022. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_10Add1-en.pdf.
- World Health Organization. Draft Global Oral Health Action Plan (2023–2030). 2023. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/ncds/mnd/oral-health/eb152-draft-global-oral-health-action-plan-2023-2030-en.pdf.
- Wallerstein N, Duran B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(S1):S40–6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.184036.
- Cargo M, Mercer SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29(1):325–350. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824.
- Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(12):1667–1676. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Principles of Community Engagement. 2011. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf.
- Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19(1):173–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173.
- Vaughn LM, Jacquez F. Participatory research methods – choice points in the research process. J Particip Res Methods. 2020;1(1). doi:10.35844/001c.13244.
- Tiwari T, Albino J. Acculturation and pediatric minority oral health interventions. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;61(3):549–563. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2017.02.006.
- Seymour B, Barrow J, Kalenderian E. Results from a new global oral health course: a case study at one dental school. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(10):1245–1251. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2013.77.10.tb05598.x.
- Yu A, Lambert RF, Alvarado JA, Guzman CAF, Seymour B. Integrating competency-based didactic and experiential global health learning for dental students: the global health learning helix model. J Dent Educ. 2020;84(4):438–448. doi:10.21815/jde.019.186.
- Tella S. The Ngäbe-Buglé: a home cut in two. Pulitzer Center. https://pulitzercenter.org/reporting/ngabe-bugle-home-cut-two. Published 2018. Accessed March 25, 2024.
- Rodríguez Zúñiga JM, Arce Benavides H, Herrera Ugalde ME, et al. Environmental and social management framework annex 2. Indigenous Peoples Plan Framework. 2018. http://ceniga.go.cr/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Indigenous-Peoples-Plan-ENREDD-28-11-2019-ENG.pdf.
- Bermúdez Mora G, Gómez Rojas E. Final Report for the Oral Health Foundation of the Pierre Fauchard Academy: Oral Health Protection Program for Vulnerable Indigenous Population of Coto Brus. San Vito, Costa Rica: Coto Brush; 2017.
- Keyes PH. Recent advances in dental caries research. Bacteriology. 1962;12:43–64.
- Tanzer JM. Dental caries is a transmissible infectious disease: the Keyes and Fitzgerald revolution. J Dent Res. 1995;74(9):1536–1542. doi:10.1177/00220345950740090601.
- Patrick DL, Lee RSY, Nucci M, Grembowski D, Jolles CZ, Milgrom P. Reducing oral health disparities: a focus on social and cultural determinants. BMC Oral Health. 2006;6(S1):S4. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S4.
- Fisher-Owens SA, Gansky SA, Platt LJ, et al. Influences on children’s oral health: a conceptual model. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):e510–e520. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-3084.
- Chi DL. Reducing Alaska native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions and a case study on multilevel strategies to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2013;72(S1):21066. doi:10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21066.
- Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
- Negin J, Cumming R, de Ramirez SS, Abimbola S, Sachs SE. Risk factors for non-communicable diseases among older adults in rural Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2011;16(5):640–646. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02739.x.
- Sheiham A, Watt RG. The common risk factor approach: a rational basis for promoting oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000;28(6):399–406. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.028006399.x.
- Karasz A, Bonuck K. Reducing pediatric caries and obesity risk in South Asian immigrants: randomized controlled trial of common health/risk factor approach. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):680. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5317-9.