1,231
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspective

Gastrochilus wolongensis (Orchidaceae): a new species from Sichuan, China, based on molecular and morphological data

, , , , , , & show all
Article: 2101546 | Received 14 Feb 2022, Accepted 09 Jul 2022, Published online: 19 Jul 2022

ABSTRACT

Gastrochilus wolongensis (Orchidaceae), a new orchid species from Sichuan Province, Southwest China, is described and illustrated. It morphologically resembles G. sinensis, but differs markedly from the latter in having black-purple stripes (vs. purplish-red spots) on the adaxial side of the petals and sepals, a reniform epichile densely covered with long papillate hairs (vs. sparsely pubescent) with purplish-red spots (vs. unspotted), and outside the sac of the hypochile with purplish-red stripes (vs. purplish-red spotted). The molecular phylogenetic analysis based on nuclear ribosome internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) and four chloroplast DNA fragments (matK, psbA-trnH, psbM-trnD, and trnL-F) of 36 Gastrochilus species showed that G. wolongensis was closely related to G. ciliaris and G. formosanus.

Introduction

Gastrochilus Don (Citation1825, 32) is a genus of about 69 species mainly distributed in Southeast Asia (Kumar et al. Citation2014; Liu, Tan, and Gao Citation2016; Raskoti Citation2016; Liu et al. Citation2019; Govaerts et al. Citation2021). Labellum in this genus is divided into an epichile and a hypochile, with the former extending from the apex of hypochile and the latter firmly adnating to both sides of the staminal column and having two porous pollinia (Seidenfaden Citation1988; Tsi Citation1999). Combining recently described species (Liu, Tan, and Gao Citation2016; Liu and Gao Citation2018; Rao et al. Citation2019; Li et al. Citation2021; Nguyen et al. Citation2021, Citation2022), scientific reports of orchid biodiversity (Zhou et al. Citation2021a, Citation2021b), and some revisions based on morphology (Tsi Citation1999) and molecular data (Liu et al. Citation2019), a total of 43 species have been documented in China, and 23 of them are Chinese endemic species.

In March 2021, a species of Gastrochilus attached to the trunk of a tree was discovered during a field trip of the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition in Wolong Nature Reserve, Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province, China. Morphologically, it did not fit any of the three known species recorded from Sichuan: G. fargesii (Kraenzlin Citation1903, 423) Schlechter (Citation1919, 288), G. formosanus Hayata (Citation1911, 336) Hayata (Citation1917, 78), and G. nanchuanensis Tsi (Citation1996, 149). It was neither documented within the local scientific report (Yang, Zhou, and He Citation2019), nor national updated catalog (http://www.sp2000.org.cn), nor in any specimen record (https://www.cvh.ac.cn). Morphological observation and comparison with type specimens of closely related species, e.g., Gastrochilus sinensis Tsi (Citation1989, 23), C. P. Tsien et al. 32550 (holotype: PE!), revealed it to be a new species and hereafter it is described as G. wolongensis, which could be distinguished from any known species of Gastrochilus. Phylogenetic analysis using mainly nuclear ribosome internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) and chloroplast fragments confirmed its position in this genus.

Materials and methods

Morphological description and measurements of Gastrochilus wolongensis were based on living plants and dried herbarium specimens. The taxonomic description follows the terminology used by Beentje (Citation2012). Voucher specimens and additional silica-gel dried leaves are stored at CDBI Herbarium (acronym of herbarium follows Thiers Citation2021). To obtain DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis, the leaves of G. sinensis (voucher ZJY228 at CDBI) were collected from Shunxiwu, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China. In addition, the DNA sequences of 40 species from Gastrochilus and closely related genera were downloaded from the GenBank database (see Supplementary Table S1). The sampled taxa cover more than half of the total members of Gastrochilus species.

DNA sequence acquisition

For 40 species, nucleotide sequences including the nrITS and the four chloroplast DNA fragments (matK, psbA-trnH, psbM-trnD and trnL-F), were retrieved from GenBank database directly. Three cp genomes (MN124437, MN124438, MN124439) representing three Gastrochilus species were also downloaded for the extraction of the corresponding chloroplast DNA fragments. The information of these DNA fragments and the three complete plastid genomes used in this study were listed in Supplementary Table S1. For G. sinensis and two individuals of the new species, total genomic DNA was extracted exclusively from silica-gel dried leaves via a Plant DNA Isolation Kit (Cat.No.DE-06111). Based on the phylogenetic study of Gastrochilus by Liu et al. (Citation2019), we applied the same primers to amplify the nrITS and the four chloroplast DNA fragments (matK, psbA-trnH, psbM-trnD and trnL-F) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All DNA samples were sent to TSINGKE Biotech Co. Ltd (Chengdu, China) for sequencing and then deposited to GenBank, with the following accession numbers: G. wolongensis, nrITS (OM985810, OM985811), matK (OK172400, OM974209), psbA-trnH (OK172402, OM974211), psbM-trnD (OK172403), trnL-F (OK172404, OM974210); G. sinensis, nrITS (OM985813), matK (OK042953), psbA-trnH (OK172399), trnL-F (OK172401).

Phylogenetic analyses

All sequences were edited by Sequencher v4.1.4 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) and aligned by MAFFT v7.475 (Katoh and Standley Citation2013) with default parameters. We performed phylogenetic analyses based on the dataset of nrITS, the four chloroplast DNA fragments, and the combined dataset of the nrITS and the four chloroplast DNA fragments, respectively. The nucleotide substitution models for the three data matrices were estimated using jModeltest 2.1.6 (Posada Citation2008) software and the evolutionary best fit model (GTR, GTR and GTR + I + G, respectively) was selected using the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc). Two different methods including Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods were employed. The ML analysis was performed using IQ-TREE v.1.4.241 (Nguyen et al. Citation2014) with branch support estimated using 2,000 replicates. The BI analysis was conducted using MrBayes 3.2.7a (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck Citation2003) with two parallel runs (20 million generations). The first 25% percent of trees from all runs were discarded as burn-in.

Results

The three molecular phylogenetic trees showed that the 36 species of Gastrochilus formed a well-supported monophyletic group (BI/ML = 1/98, ; BI/ML = 0.99/91, Supplementary Fig. S1; BI/ML = 0.90/93, Supplementary Fig. S2). Two accessions of G. wolongensis from different localities were resolved as sister to each other. Gastrochilus wolongensis and G. ciliaris Maekawa (Citation1936, 92) formed a well-supported (BI/ML = 0.91/84, ; BI/ML = 0.93/91, Supplementary Fig. S2) monophyletic group, which was sister to G. formosanus (BI/ML = 0.87/95, ; BI/ML = 0.89/92, Supplementary Fig. S2). Gastrochilus sinensis was resolved as sister to a subclade consists of the three above mentioned species and three Gastrochilus species based on the data-sets of combined nrITS and chloroplast regions with moderately support (BI/ML = 0.82/73, ). Within the subclade, G. sinensis () is morphologically closest to G. wolongensis (); G. formosanus () and G. ciliaris () are also similar to G. wolongensis in general morphology, though both have relatively smaller epichile and hypochile (). A thorough morphological comparison of G. wolongensis, C. sinensis, C. formosanus, and G. ciliaris is also summarized in .

Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of Gastrochilus from phylogenetic analysis of combined nrITS, matK, psbA–trnH, psbM–trnD and trnL-F sequence data. Numbers before slash indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities and numbers after slash indicate ML bootstrap supports for major lineages. The new species inferred are indicated in red.

Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of Gastrochilus from phylogenetic analysis of combined nrITS, matK, psbA–trnH, psbM–trnD and trnL-F sequence data. Numbers before slash indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities and numbers after slash indicate ML bootstrap supports for major lineages. The new species inferred are indicated in red.

Figure 2. Comparison of Gastrochilus wolongensis (A, B) with G. sinensis (C, D),G. formosanus (E, F) and G. ciliaris (G, H). [Images C & D courtesy of Feng Li; image E referring to website (http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~flower_world/Orchids/); image F cited from Kumar et al. (Citation2014); images G & H reproduced from website (http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~flower_world/Orchids/)].

Figure 2. Comparison of Gastrochilus wolongensis (A, B) with G. sinensis (C, D),G. formosanus (E, F) and G. ciliaris (G, H). [Images C & D courtesy of Feng Li; image E referring to website (http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~flower_world/Orchids/); image F cited from Kumar et al. (Citation2014); images G & H reproduced from website (http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~flower_world/Orchids/)].

Table 1. Morphological comparison of Gastrochilus wolongensis with three related species: G. sinensis, G. formosanus, and G. ciliaris.

Taxonomy

Gastrochilus wolongensis Jun.Y.Zhang, B.Xu & Yue.H.Cheng, sp. nov. ().

Figure 3. Gastrochilus wolongensis A. Flowering plant. B. inflorescence (side view). C. Flower (front view). D. Flower (dorsal view). E. Anatomy of flowers (E1: dorsal sepal; E2 and E3: sepals; E4 and E5: petals; E6: labellum). F. Labellum and stamens (profile view). G. Pedicel, ovary and labellum (profile view). H. Labellum (dorsal view). I. Capsule. J. Leaves (front view). K. Peduncle (front view). L. Leaves (dorsal view).

Figure 3. Gastrochilus wolongensis A. Flowering plant. B. inflorescence (side view). C. Flower (front view). D. Flower (dorsal view). E. Anatomy of flowers (E1: dorsal sepal; E2 and E3: sepals; E4 and E5: petals; E6: labellum). F. Labellum and stamens (profile view). G. Pedicel, ovary and labellum (profile view). H. Labellum (dorsal view). I. Capsule. J. Leaves (front view). K. Peduncle (front view). L. Leaves (dorsal view).

Type

CHINA. Sichuan: Wenchuan, Wolong, evergreen broad-leaved forest, on tree trunk, elev. ca. 1700 m, 29 March 2021, Jun-Yi Zhang & Yue-Hong Cheng ZJY140 (holotype CDBI).

Diagnosis

It has similar habit dimension and leaves (two columns alternate, elliptic or oblong in outline and leaf blade green with a few purplish-red spots) with Gastrochilus sinensis, but it differs in shorter branched stems (4–9 cm vs. 10–20 cm in the latter), one or two flowered racemes with larger sized flowers (1.2 × 1.3 cm vs. 1.0 × 1.1 cm in the latter), and black-purple striped sepals and petals. Moreover, the labellum with larger and reniform epichile (4.5–5.2 × 10.0–12.3 mm vs. 2.5 × 4.0–5.0 mm in the latter) densely papillate, distinctly purplish-red spotted while yellow-green centered, and with hypochile distinctly purplish-red striped on outside sac.

Epiphytic herbs, prostrate, 4.0–9.0 cm tall, leafy. Roots vermiform, slender, up to 8.0 cm long. Stems short branched, green, glabrous, up to 9.0 cm long, covered with sheathing leaf bases; sheaths with purplish-red spots; internodes of stems 3.2–4.0 mm long. Leaves alternate, distichous, elliptic or oblong, plump, both surfaces green with few purplish red spots, 1.1–1.5 × 0.5–0.8 cm, margin smooth, apex acute and leathery. Inflorescence in racemes with 1 or 2 flowers, ca. 2.8 cm long; Peduncle 4.0–7.0 mm long. Flowers 1.2 × 1.3 cm, light yellowish green, with black-purple stripes on petals and sepals, elevated on abaxial midrib; pedicel and ovary 6.0–8.3 mm long, green at the base and blackish green toward the apex; dorsal sepal elliptic-oblong, 6.8–8.9 × 4.2–5.8 mm, with 3 veins, only the midvein reaching the apex; lateral sepals elliptic-oblong, slightly pointed at the apex, 6.2–8.6 × 4.2–5.8 mm, with 1 vein; petals obovate, 7.1–8.5 × 4.5–6.0 mm, with 3 veins, none reaching the apex; labellum 7.0–9.8 × 6.2–7.7 mm; hypochile attached to base of column wing, subcupular, laterally compressed, ca. 3.7 × 5.8 mm, opening cordate, base saccate, sac with lavender patches inside, long papillate hairs near epichile side, outside of sac with conspicuous purplish-red stripes; epichile reniform, apically concave, densely covered with long papillate hairs, 4.5–5.2 × 10.0–12.3 mm, with purplish-red spots and a yellow-green center; column cylindrical, ca. 3.0 mm; anther cap subhemispheric, with two chambers, 1.2 × 1.4 mm, hanging from both ends of the stipe; pollinia 2, 0.7 × 0.6 mm, yellow, full and nearly spherical, with a depression in the center; stigma deeply sunken, inverted V-shaped, 1.2 mm long, yellow, apically forked, forked in a subtriangular outline. Capsule long ellipsoid, 14–18 mm long, green with sparse purplish-red spots, prominently 3-ridged.

Additional specimens examined

CHINA. Sichuan: Wenchuan, Wolong, evergreen broad-leaved forest, on tree trunk, elev. ca. 1700 m, 2 March 2022, Jun-Yi Zhang & Yue-Hong Cheng ZJY142 (CDBI).

Distribution, habitat and phenology

The new species in currently known only from Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province, Southwest China. It is found epiphytic on tree trunks, at elevation ca. 1700 m. It is in flowering from March to April.

Etymology

– The specific epithet is derived from Wolong Nature Reserve, which was one of the earliest reserves dedicated to preserve the habitat of wild pandas. A Chinese name, wo long peng ju lan (卧龙盆距兰), is suggested here.

Conservation status

Due to the probably need of more extensive fieldwork, we assessed the conservation status of Gastrochilus wolongensis as DD (Data Deficient) according to the IUCN (Citation2019).

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (6 MB)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Feng Li for his help during the field trip in collecting materials and taking photos of G. sinensis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2022.2101546

Additional information

Funding

Our work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFE0203200), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) program (Grant No. 2019QZKK0502), 2022 Central Finance Forestry Grassland Ecological Protection and Restoration National Park Subsidy Project, 2022 Subsidy Projects of Prohibited Developmental Areas from the Transfer Payment of the National Key Ecological Functional Areas, and Wild Plants Sharing and Service Platform of Sichuan Province.

References

  • Beentje, H. 2012. The Kew Plant Glossary, an Illustrated Dictionary of Plant Terms. Richmond: Royal Botanic Garden, Kew Publishing.
  • Don, D. 1825. “Prodromus Florae Nepalensis.” Journal Gale London XII: 1.
  • Govaerts, R., M. A. Campacci, D. H. Baptista, P. J. Baptista, A. George, K. Kreutz, and J. J. Wood. 2021. “World Checklist of Orchidaceae.” Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Accessed 13 August 2021. http://www.kew.org/wcsp/monocots
  • Hayata, B. 1911. “Materials for a Flora of Formosa: Supplementary Notes to the Enumeratio Plantarum Formosanarum and Flora Montana Formosae, Based on a Study of the Collection of the Botanical Survey of the Government of Formosa, Principally Made at the Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.” Journal of the College of Science. Imperial University of Tokyo 30: 1–8.
  • Hayata, B. 1917. “Icones Plantarum Formosanarum, nec non et contributions ad floram Formosanam.” Government of Formosa, Taihoku [Taipei]. 6: 155.
  • IUCN. 2019. “Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Vers. 14.” Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, Accessed 21 September 2021. http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf
  • Katoh, K., and D. M. Standley. 2013. “MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 30 (4): 772–780. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010.
  • Kraenzlin, F. 1903. “Deux orchidées nouvelles.” Journal de Botanique (Morot) 17 (12): 422–424.
  • Kumar, P., S. W. Gale, A. Kocyan, G. A. Fischer, L. V. Averyanov, R. Borosova, A. Bhattacharjee, J. H. Li, and K. S. Pang. 2014. “Gastrochilus Kadooriei (Orchidaceae), a New Species from Hong Kong, with Notes on Allied Taxa in Section Microphyllae Found in the Region.” Phytotaxa 164 (2): 91–103. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.164.2.3.
  • Li, J. W., J. D. Ya, D. P. Ye, C. Liu, Q. Liu, R. Pan, Z. X. He, et al. 2021. “Taxonomy Notes on Vandeae (Orchidaceae) from China: Five New Species and Two New Records.” Plant Diversity 43 (5): 379–389. doi:10.1016/j.pld.2021.01.009.
  • Liu, Q., Y. H. Tan, and J. Y. Gao. 2016. “A New Species of Gastrochilus (Aeridinae, Vandeae, Orchidaceae) and A New Record Species from Yunnan, China.” Phytotaxa 282 (1): 066–070. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.282.1.8.
  • Liu, Q., and J. Y. Gao. 2018. “Gastrochilus Dulongjiangensis (Aeridinae, Vandeae, Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae), a New Species from Yunnan Province, China.” Phytotaxa 340 (3): 293–296. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.340.3.11.
  • Liu, Q., Y. Song, X. Jin, and J. Gao. 2019. “Phylogenetic Relationships of Gastrochilus (Orchidaceae) Based on Nuclear and Plastid DNA Data.” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 189 (3): 228–243. doi:10.1093/botlinnean/boy084.
  • Maekawa, F. 1936. “Studia Monocotyledonearum Japonicarum (VI).” Journal of Japanese Botany 12: 92–93.
  • Nguyen, L. T., H. A. Schmidt, A. Von-Haeseler, and B. Q. Minh. 2014. “IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 32 (1): 268–274. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu300.
  • Nguyen, D. H., L. V. Averyanov, V. S. Dang, V. H. Bui, T. V. Maisak, and B. V. Truong. 2021. “Gastrochilus Dresslerii (Orchidaceae), a New Species from Northern Vietnam.” Phytotaxa 498 (2): 145–149. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.498.2.8.
  • Nguyen, V. C., L. V. Averyanov, T. V. Maisak, T. L. T. Nguyen, V. K. Nguyen, and B. V. Truong. 2022. “Gastrochilus Pankajkumarii, (Aeridinae, Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae) a New Lithophytic Orchid from Southern Vietnam.” Taiwania 67 (1): 35‒39. doi:10.6165/tai.2022.67.35.
  • Posada, D. 2008. “jModelTest: Phylogenetic Model Averaging.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 25 (7): 1253–1256. doi:10.1093/molbev/msn083.
  • Rao, W. H., Z. J. Liu, G. Q. Zhang, X. H. Chen, J. Huang, G. Z. Chen, and L. J. Chen. 2019. “A New Epiphytic Species of Gastrochilus (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae) from Yunnan, China.” Phytotaxa 340: 293–296. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.413.4.5.
  • Raskoti, B. B. 2016. “A New Species of Gastrochilus and New Records for the Orchids of Nepal.” Phytotaxa 233 (2): 179–184. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.233.2.5.
  • Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. “MrBayes 3: Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference under Mixed Models.” Bioinformatics 19 (12): 1572–1574. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.
  • Schlechter, F. R. R. 1919. “Orchideologiae Sino-Japonicae prodromus. Eine kritische Besprechtung der Orchideen Ost-Asien.” Repertorium Specierum Novarum Regni Vegetabilis, Beihefte 4: 1–319.
  • Seidenfaden, G. 1988. “Orchid Genera in Thailand. Fifty-nine Vandoid Genera.” Opera Botanica 95: 285–287.
  • Thiers, B. 2021. “Index Herbariorum: A Global Directory of Public Herbaria and Associated Staff.” New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium.
  • Tsi, Z. H. 1989. “New Taxa of Orchidaceae from China.” Bulletin of Botanical Research Harbin 9 (2): 21–32.
  • Tsi, Z. H. 1996. “A Preliminary Revision of Gastrochilus (Orchidaceae).” Guihaia 16: 149.
  • Tsi, Z. H. 1999. “Gastrochilus D. Don.” In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, edited by Z. H. Tsi, 399–420. Vol. 19. Beijing: Science Press.
  • Yang, Z. S., C. Q. Zhou, and T. M. He. 2019. “Comprehensive Scientific Investigation Report of Wolong National Nature Reserve, Sichuan.” Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House. 502.
  • Zhou, Z. H., R. H. Shi, Y. Zhang, and X. H. Jin. 2021a. “Orchid Diversity in China: Recent Discoveries.” Plant Diversity 43 (5): 341–342. doi:10.1016/j.pld.2021.07.004.
  • Zhou, Z. H., R. H. Shi, Y. Zhang, X. K. Xing, and X. H. Jin. 2021b. “Orchid Conservation in China from 2000 to 2020: Achievements and Perspectives.” Plant Diversity 43 (5): 343–349. doi:10.1016/j.pld.2021.06.003.