813
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Acceptance & Hesitation

Knowledge, concerns, and vaccine acceptance related to Mpox (Monkeypox) among university students in North and Northeast China: An online cross-sectional study

, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2339922 | Received 18 Jan 2024, Accepted 03 Apr 2024, Published online: 19 Apr 2024

ABSTRACT

The growing number of Mpox cases in China has posed a challenge to public health. The prevalence of men who have sex with men behaviors among students has been consistently increasing each year in China, accompanied by a high frequency of unprotected anal sex. As crowded places, schools are highly likely to cause an Mpox outbreak among students through long-term close contact. Understanding university students’ perceptions about Mpox and willingness to vaccinate play a vital role in implementing preventive measures in schools. This study aimed to assess knowledge, concerns, and vaccine acceptance toward Mpox among university students in North and Northeast China. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 3831 university students from seven universities in North and Northeast China between September 10 and September 25, 2023. This study found a relative insufficiency in Mpox knowledge among university students (71.60%), with less than half expressing concern about the Mpox outbreak (39.57%), and the majority exhibiting a positive attitude to vaccination (76.30%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that a good knowledge level was associated with age, study discipline, education level, and a high level of concern about Mpox. Male, elderly, or highly educated participants had a low level of concern about Mpox. Participants with a high level of knowledge toward Mpox were more likely to have the vaccination willingness. This study might help governments and schools to understand students’ Mpox perceptions and vaccination intentions, enabling them to implement effective measures in addressing the issue of inadequate understanding regarding Mpox among university students.

Introduction

Monkeypox disease (Mpox) was a zoonotic infectious disease caused by the Mpox virus, which belonged to members of the genus Orthopoxviral.Citation1 The Mpox virus was first discovered in monkeys in 1958, and the first Mpox case was detected in a nine-month-old boy from the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1970.Citation1 Mpox was mainly endemic in Central and West Africa, and had since spread to many nonendemic countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and others.Citation2 The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported a total of 91,123 confirmed Mpox cases and 663 probable cases, including 157 deaths as of September 30, 2023.Citation3

The common clinical manifestations of Mpox contained fever, muscle and headache pain, rash, and lymphadenopathy.Citation4–6 The increase in international travel, the popularity of new pets, and the decline in smallpox vaccination protection all contribute to increase the risk of Mpox transmission.Citation7,Citation8 Mpox virus could spread by animal-to-human transmission or human-to-human transmission.Citation6,Citation9 The routes of Mpox human-to-human transmission included intimate or sexual contact, contaminated surfaces or skin-to-skin contact, and respiratory droplets contact.Citation10 Sexual contact (especially sex between men) was the most important way of transmission.Citation11,Citation12

On September 16, 2022, the first imported case of Mpox in the mainland of China was found in Chongqing Municipality, China.Citation13 Between June and August 2023, 1098 Mpox cases were detected in China in just 3 months.Citation14 This implies that China continues to face the public health challenges posed by Mpox. Moreover, as a populous country, China cannot effectively control local transmission, which could potentially exacerbate risk of global transmission.Citation15,Citation16 The incidence of Mpox in North and Northeast China was significantly high.Citation14 Especially in Beijing, the most Mpox cases were reported in North China, where 180 Mpox cases were reported between June and August 2023.Citation14 And a high number of men who have sex with men (MSM) exist in North and Northeast China, among which Beijing, Hebei, Jilin, Heilongjiang, and other regions are the high concentration areas of MSM population.Citation17 And the average number of online MSM numbers in a social networking MSM app could be over 60,000 per day in Beijing.Citation18 In addition, the prevalence of men who have sex with men (MSM) behaviors among students has been consistently increasing each year in China,Citation19 accompanied by a high frequency of unprotected anal sex.Citation20,Citation21 MSM students were more than three times more likely to have had sexual contact with casual or commercial sex partners compared with non-MSM students, which makes it easier to spread Mpox.Citation19 What’s more, prolonged frequent physical contact between students might lead to the occurrence of Mpox cluster.Citation22 Although students are not the main infected group, the above characteristics might have a high risk of Mpox transmission in the student population. Therefore, before the Mpox outbreak occurred in schools, understanding university students’ perception about Mpox and willingness to vaccinate played a vital role in implementing preventive measures in schools.

However, studies are scarce on university students’ perception about Mpox and willingness to vaccinate in China. Only one study examined the high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among university students in southwest China, but there was no assessment conducted regarding the students’ perception of Mpox.Citation23 Several other studies in China focused on healthcare workers,Citation24,Citation25 the general public,Citation26–28 or MSM.Citation29–33 These findings indicated that the general populationCitation26,Citation27 and MSM populationCitation29–32 in China had limited knowledge level of Mpox, while the knowledge level of Mpox was high in healthcare workers.Citation24 Moreover, Chinese individuals had a relatively strong willingness to vaccinate against Mpox.Citation24–26,Citation28,Citation29 Only one study reported a high knowledge level of Mpox among the Chinese population, which might be due to large selection bias resulting from a small sample size (N = 521).Citation28 At present, there were few studies on the level of concern about Mpox in the Chinese population, the rates of which varied from 37.1% to 62.7%.Citation24,Citation26,Citation27,Citation30 Several studies found a correlation between major factors, such as level of education,Citation27,Citation28,Citation32 age,Citation24,Citation32 and Mpox knowledge in China. A low knowledge level of Mpox was associated with a low willingness to vaccinate.Citation23,Citation24,Citation26,Citation28–30 Therefore, considering the potential lack of perception among university students regarding Mpox and the limited research in the current studies, it is necessary to investigate their level of knowledge, concerns, and vaccine acceptance toward Mpox. In addition, the analysis of factors influencing knowledge, concerns, and vaccine acceptance toward Mpox will facilitate the development of targeted strategies for future interventions in schools. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate knowledge, concerns, and vaccine acceptance toward Mpox, and their influencing factors among university students in North and Northeast China.

Materials and methods

Study setting, design, and sampling

This was a cross-sectional study which was carried out through a self-administered online questionnaire designed using an online survey platform (called Wenjuanxing). The data were collected between September 10 and September 25, 2023. A convenience sampling method was used to collect the questionnaire. This study randomly selected among students at seven universities in North and Northeast China, including three universities in Beijing (Beijing University of Technology, the Capital University of Economics and Business, and Capital Medical University); Jilin University in Jilin Province; Harbin Medical University in Heilongjiang Province; Hebei Medical University in Hebei Province; and Baotou Medical College in Inner Mongolia. Questionnaires are voluntarily distributed to students through online platforms with the assistance of counselors or school medical professionals in schools. Participants under the age of 18 and those who declined to participate were not eligible to be included in this study. All participants were provided with online informed consent. Meanwhile, participants were acquired to answer two common-sense questions unrelated to this study, “Where is the capital of China? (Shanghai/Beijing/Nanjing/Wuhan)” and “In which direction does the sun rise in the morning? (West/East/South/North),” to eliminate participants who did not answer the questions seriously.

The questionnaire has been employed in a previous study.Citation26 The questionnaire was modified by a team of six infectious disease staff members from Chaoyang District Center for Disease Prevention and Control of Beijing, along with a professor from Fudan University, to enhance its applicability to the university student population. Additionally, an assessment of its surface validity was conducted to ensure coherence, accuracy, and comprehensibility. Prior to official distribution, a pilot study involving approximately ten samples was carried out. The results indicated the clarity and comprehensibility of these questions.

The sample size was computed by using the single sample proportion formula, n = [(Zα/2)2P (1-P)/d2], where n is the number of sample size, Zα/2 is 1.96 at a 95% confidence interval, d is a 5% margin of error. Referring to a previous survey of the public in China, 54.5% of the participants learned about Mpox information before the survey.Citation26 This value was applied as an estimated response distribution (P). Thus, a minimum sample size of 382 was determined.

Demographic characteristics

Participants’ demographic information was asked to provide, which included age (<20 and ≥20 y), gender (Male or Female), major (Medical or Non-medical), study level (Undergraduate and below, Postgraduate and above), living area (Rural or Urban), relationship status (Single or Unsingle), sexual behavior in the last 3 months (Yes or No), chronic disease (Yes or No). Age was categorized into two groups based on the median age of 20 y in the study. Chronic diseases included hypertension, diabetes, gout/hyperuricemia, chronic pain, chronic respiratory disease, immunodeficiency disease, malignant tumor, and others.

Awareness about Mpox

The awareness of Mpox was evaluated by asking, “Did you learn about Mpox before this survey? (Yes or No).” If participants who selected “Yes,” how to get Mpox information (Internet sources, traditional media, publicity by schools and other organizational units, communicate with friends or others, etc.) and how much they were about Mpox (Often, occasionally, rarely, and unconcerned) were further asked to recall.

Knowledge of Mpox

The knowledge of Mpox was measured by 12 knowledge items. The scale was adopted from a survey of 1028 Chinese community residents regarding the awareness, knowledge, and concerns about Mpox.Citation27

The Mpox knowledge scale was as follows: (1) Mpox is an infectious disease, (2) Mpox is caused by a virus, (3) People can get Mpox by close contact with an infected person or animal, (4) People are generally susceptible to Mpox, (5) There are currently no specific treatments for Mpox, (6) There is a vaccine that protects against Mpox. (7) Mpox can cause fever, (8) Mpox can cause headache, (9) Mpox can cause fatigue or exhaustion, (10) Mpox can cause swollen lymph nodes, (11) Mpox can cause a body rash, (12) Mpox can cause back and muscle aches. Participants were acquired to choose one of the three answers (Yes/No/Don’t know) for each question. The answer “don’t know” was considered wrong. Having a high level of common or clinical knowledge about Mpox was defined as answering more than seven questions correctly.

The 7-item generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7)

The GAD-7 with seven validated questions was used to assess anxiety symptoms of participants toward the Mpox (Supplementary Table S1).Citation34 Participants with 5–21 scores were identified as having anxiety.Citation29

Concerns about Mpox

All participants were asked, “Are you concerned about the Mpox epidemic? (Yes/No),” aiming to measure participants’ concerns about Mpox.Citation24,Citation26 If selected yes, we further asked the reason why there was concern about the Mpox pandemic.

Attitudes toward Mpox

This section contains five questions designed to measure the attitude toward Mpox according to the previous study,Citation35 with three-point Likert scale possible responses (disagree/undecided/agree) (Supplementary Table S2). Different responses to the score were as follows: disagree = 0, undecided = 1, agree = 2. A positive attitude was defined as having a score exceeding or equal to the average value of the participants’ scores, while a negative attitude was lower than the average.

Willingness to adopt preventive measures and Mpox vaccine

Willingness to adopt preventive measures was collected by a single question “How do you think you should avoid Mpox infection?.” The preventive measures were divided into three categories (hygiene practices/social distancing/travel avoidance) according to the previous study.Citation26,Citation36 Willingness to adopt the Mpox vaccine was measured by asking participants “Whether they were willing to get the Mpox vaccine?,” with 3-Likert scale possible responses (disagree = 1, neutral = 2, agree = 3). The answers of neutral and disagree were both defined as unwillingness. In addition, participants who refused to be vaccinated were required to select specific reasons.

Statistical analyses

Continuous variables were expressed with Mean and Standard Deviations, while categorical data were given with frequencies and percentages. The Chi-square test was used to compare the differences of characteristics between groups. The Crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the association between possible influencing factors and Mpox knowledge, concerns about Mpox, and vaccine acceptance toward Mpox among students. All variables in the univariable analysis were also included in the multivariable logistic regression model. To establish the optimal model and address potential multicollinearity, backward stepwise regression was used to select variables and identify the final model in the multivariable logistic model. Data analyzes were examined using R software (Version 4.3.1). Statistical significance was defined as a p value of <.05.

Results

A total of 3831 students participated in this study, excluding 89 students who declined to participate, 83 students who answered common-sense questions incorrectly, 143 students who were under the age of 18 and 7 students whose data were abnormal. The mean age of the participants was 20.62 ± 2.58 y. Most of the participants were female (66.98%), were single (79.12%), were undergraduate and below (68.10%), majored in non-medical specialty (94.13%), lived in urban (77.84%), having no sexual behavior (90.16%) and no history of chronic disease (95.77%) ().

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study participants (N = 3831).

In this study, 64.84% of participants learned about Mpox before the survey (). The two main ways to acquire Mpox information included the Internet (such as Wechat, Weibo, etc.) and traditional media (such as TV, newspapers, radio, etc.) (). About 71.60% of the participants had a high level of knowledge about Mpox. More than half of the participants did not understand that there was a vaccine to prevent Mpox (54.71%), no specific drugs to treat Mpox (50.07%), and the general susceptibility of the population (51.21%) ().

Figure 1. Source of Mpox information among university students who attention about Mpox.

Figure 1. Source of Mpox information among university students who attention about Mpox.

Figure 2. Answer each Mpox knowledge question correctly among university students.

Figure 2. Answer each Mpox knowledge question correctly among university students.

Table 2. Knowledge, concerns, and vaccine acceptance related to Mpox of all participants (N = 3831).

Part of participants (39.57%) were concerned about the Mpox outbreak (). Worrying about infection in self or family (89.45%) was the leading cause of concern about the Mpox outbreak (). And 56.75% of the participants expressed a negative attitude toward Mpox. Few participants (12.01%) were anxious about the Mpox (). The majority of participants (76.30%) were willing to adopt the Mpox vaccine. Concerns about the adverse effects (80.84%) or protective effects (46.48%) of the vaccine were the main reasons for reluctance to vaccinate (). Participants choose social distancing, travel avoidance, and vaccination as the main means of preventing Mpox (data not shown).

Figure 3. The reasons among university students who worried about Mpox.

Figure 3. The reasons among university students who worried about Mpox.

Figure 4. The reasons why university students were not willing to get the Mpox vaccine.

Figure 4. The reasons why university students were not willing to get the Mpox vaccine.

shows multivariate regression analysis of Mpox knowledge level and its influencing factors. Medical students were more likely to have a higher knowledge level about Mpox compared to non-medical students (adjusted OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.12–2.21). Participants with high knowledge levels were likely to be young (adjusted OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.50–0.72), have a high education level (adjusted OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.02–1.50), a good awareness to Mpox (adjusted OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.43–1.92), a good attitude about Mpox (adjusted OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.41–1.90), and a high level of concern toward Mpox (adjusted OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.09–1.47).

Table 3. Factors associated with Mpox knowledge level among university students in North and Northeast China.

The association between related influencing factors and concerns about Mpox is presented in . Participants aged 20 y or older also had a negative concern about Mpox than those who were younger than 20 y old (adjusted OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64–0.92). Compared to female participants, male participants expressed a lower level of concern about Mpox (adjusted OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.46–0.63). Furthermore, a low level of concern about Mpox was associated with having high education level (adjusted OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57–0.84), living in urban (adjusted OR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.64–0.91), existing sexual behavior (adjusted OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61–1.02), having a positive attitude (adjusted OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56–0.75). On the contrary, anxiety about Mpox (adjusted OR: 8.14; 95% CI: 6.30–10.52) had a positive association with concerns about Mpox.

Table 4. Factors associated with concerns about Mpox among university students in North and Northeast China.

displays the association between influencing factors and willingness to adopt the Mpox vaccine using by multivariate regression analysis. Older than younger (adjusted OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.58–0.79), male compared with female (adjusted OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56–0.77), participants who learned about Mpox compared with participants who did not (adjusted OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.70–0.97) had a lower willingness to be vaccinated. Inversely, compared with participants who had a lower knowledge level or a more negative attitude, participants with a higher knowledge level (adjusted OR:1.39; 95% CI: 1.18–1.64) or a more positive attitude (adjusted OR:1.35; 95% CI: 1.15–1.58) had a higher willingness to be vaccinated. Anxiety (adjusted OR:1.53; 95% CI: 1.16–2.02) or concerns (adjusted OR:1.21; 95% CI: 1.02–1.43) about Mpox were more likely to make participants willing to get vaccinated.

Table 5. Factors associated with willingness to adopt the Mpox vaccine among university students in North and Northeast China.

Discussion

This study found that university students in North and Northeast China had a relatively low knowledge level of Mpox, were less concerned about the Mpox epidemic and willing to get the Mpox vaccine. The study showed that participants with high knowledge levels were likely to be young, majored in medicine, highly educated, have a good awareness of Mpox, have a positive attitude toward Mpox, and have a high level of concern about Mpox. A high level of concern about Mpox was associated with young, female, having a low education level, living in rural areas, and having a negative attitude, and feeling anxiety about Mpox. Younger than older, female compared with male, lower awareness of Mpox than higher awareness of Mpox, higher knowledge level than lower knowledge level, and more positive attitude than more negative and had better willingness to be vaccinated.

This study demonstrated that 71.60% of the students had a high level of Mpox knowledge. The result was similar with the previous studies showing inadequate knowledge of Mpox among students from different countries.Citation37–40 A community-based study in China reported that 43.5% and 50.3% of 1028 residents had low knowledge regarding Mpox and related symptoms, respectively (correct answers ≥4 out of 6 items).Citation27 Another study in China also found that getting knowledge of Mpox was insufficient in the general public.Citation26 Whereas, 91.1% healthcare workers in China had satisfactory knowledge levels of Mpox common knowledge (≥4 out of 7 questions).Citation24 The possible speculation between the differences that the media coverage of the first imported Mpox cases in Hong Kong and Chongqing during the study period might have improved healthcare workers’ perceptions of Mpox.Citation24 The limited knowledge of Mpox among students might be attributed to its low prevalence in schools, resulting in inadequate attention from students. Insufficient knowledge regarding Mpox could exert a detrimental influence on disease control efforts.Citation41 A study has demonstrated that illness perceptions had significant direct effect on their adherence to precautionary measures.Citation42 Therefore, reinforcing students’ knowledge of Mpox is of paramount importance.

Social media was an important way to spread knowledge about Mpox among students. Previous research has demonstrated that social media is a powerful tool for spreading awareness in infection prevention, helping people make the right decisions and changing their behavior patterns, especially during pandemics.Citation43 The role of social media in raising knowledge of Mpox among students should be further reinforced. In addition, one study suggested that lectures, seminars, and the use of electronic and print media were also some important ways to improve the knowledge of Mpox.Citation44 An intervention study of 960 medical students used a range of teaching and learning techniques, including interactive lectures, group discussions, demonstrations and re-demonstrations, instructional materials, such as data shows and lab models, and printed handouts.Citation45 The intervention study revealed that total knowledge scores of students increased 20 points approximately after the intervention.Citation45 These findings offered practical approaches for schools to promote students’ awareness and knowledge of Mpox. This study also found that university students had different degrees of mastery of different types of knowledge about Mpox. This study found that university students lacked knowledge regarding vaccination, treatment methods, and susceptible populations for Mpox, which was the direction that schools should strive to promote Mpox knowledge. This study found that 39.57% students were concerned about the Mpox outbreak, similar to two studies in China.Citation27,Citation30 However, the result was lower than medical workers (56.7%)Citation24 and the public (62.7%)Citation26 in China. The possible reasons for this difference may be explained by having to do with both the increased understanding of Mpox over time and differences in identity itself. This study reported that the percentage of university students in China willing to receive the Mpox vaccine was 76.30%, which was higher than that of university students in Pakistan (67.7%).Citation37 Previous studies showed that rates of vaccine acceptance varied from 68.8%Citation26 to 76.4%Citation28 in the public in China, which were similar to the willingness rate of university students in this study. On the contrary, a review reported that vaccine hesitancy was common in the general population from other countries, with acceptance/willingness rates ranging from 29% to 50.6%.Citation46 The WHO ranked vaccine hesitancy as one of the top ten global health threats.Citation47 A review expressed that vaccination would be an important strategy for prevention toward Mpox because of the global rapid transmission, the existence of effective vaccines, and risk-benefit uncertainty of antivirals.Citation48 And the application of smallpox vaccines and antiviral drugs could also inhibit the spread of local viruses and reduce lesion pain after exposure.Citation49 However, China stopped vaccinating against it after 1982 since the WHO declared smallpox virus extinct worldwide in 1980.Citation50 In addition, there currently exists no Mpox vaccine in China. Therefore, the government should speed up the introduction of foreign vaccines and accelerate the development of domestic vaccines. Meanwhile, it is essential that schools should strengthen publicity effort, which aims to increase students’ willingness to vaccinate. This study found that some major aspects that were not in favor of vaccination, which contained concerns about adverse or protective effects, which contributed to the development of targeted vaccine publicity strategies in schools.

The study found that a good knowledge level was associated with age, study discipline, education level, and a high level of concern about Mpox. Other studies also reported that medical students could have a better knowledge level than non-medical students.Citation37,Citation40 Younger students had a higher level of knowledge than older students, contrary to other studies.Citation38,Citation40,Citation51 The possible reason was that young students were more familiar with the internet and thus better access to information on Mpox from the internet.Citation40 The association between a high level of knowledge about Mpox and increased worries about Mpox was also found in another study on the Mpox perception among medical workers in China.Citation24 The possible speculation that high levels of Mpox knowledge were more aware of the severity of the global Mpox outbreak.Citation24

The study revealed that male, elderly, or highly educated participants had a low level of concern about Mpox, which was similar to previous research.Citation27,Citation52 The gender and age differences in Mpox concerns might be attributed to themselves in coping with stress.Citation27 Previous studies have also reported a higher level of concern and fear of coronavirus disease 19 among female compared to male.Citation53,Citation54 This gender difference is evident not only in the context of infectious diseases but also extends to other socio-natural hazards,Citation55 potentially attributed to heightened ability to perceive warning signs as credible in females and exhibiting a high inclination toward risk perception.Citation56 Older people are better able to adapt to stressors than younger people,Citation52 which may potentially alleviate older people’s concerns regarding the Mpox epidemic. Additionally, people with higher education have better access to reliable psychosocial resources for coping with anxiety about Mpox.Citation52

The study has demonstrated that sociodemographic factors, including age and gender, exhibit a significant correlation with the acceptance of vaccination. A previous study also found that younger participants were more receptive to vaccines than older participantsCitation26 because they could be more trusting of modern medical technology.Citation57 A possible explanation for the greater vaccination acceptance in females is that females have a higher level of concern about Mpox than males, which motivates them to seek vaccination for disease prevention. Similar to previous research,Citation24,Citation26,Citation28 participants with a high level of knowledge toward Mpox were more likely to have vaccination willingness. The finding highlights the importance of enhancing students’ knowledge of Mpox to improve students’ willingness to vaccinate.

Certainly, schools should also be prepared when Mpox strikes in addition to enhancing students’ perceptions of Mpox. The High Council for Public Health in French recommended specific guidelines in case of occurrence of an Mpox infection in schools, including coordinating management by the medical and social workers in schools, identifying high-risk contacts, self-surveillance, adjusting infection control measures according to the occurrence of clustered cases, enhancing cleaning and ventilation of the building, and more.Citation58 A model-based analysis has shown that control with timely detection and isolation of symptomatic cases are important ways to future outbreaks of Mpox on college campuses.Citation22 Understanding students’ knowledge of Mpox, concerns, and willingness to vaccinate will help the government and schools to develop effective coping strategies. The findings of this study are valuable for the schools in identifying students’ insufficient knowledge of Mpox and implementing targeted publicity strategies. Simultaneously, understanding students’ willingness to vaccinate will also lay the groundwork for future promotion of the Mpox vaccine within schools. Furthermore, these results can serve as fundamental data for future extensive cross-sectional studies and intervention programs aimed at enhancing students’ understanding of Mpox in China.

This study showed several limitations. First, although this study included many participants from seven schools, it could not provide a comprehensive representation of all students in North and Northeast China. Additionally, this study employed convenience sampling and predominantly recruited participants from schools in Beijing, leading to potential selection bias. The generalizability of the results in this study to all Chinese students was limited, thus further research should consider expanding the sample sizes to enhance the representativeness. Second, this was a cross-sectional survey, where causality cannot be determined. Cohort studies could be needed to observe this dynamic change of students’ Mpox knowledge in the future. Third, due to the voluntary nature of participant selection, the study lacked information regarding the knowledge level of Mpox and vaccination intentions among non-responding participants, which might potentially lead to an overestimation or underestimation of the findings, resulting in non-response bias. In addition, the simplicity of statistical methods was insufficient for comprehensively discussing the factors influencing Mpox perceptions and vaccination intention. Furthermore, preliminary findings can be gained by employing the logistic regression method, but future research necessitates the utilization of more advanced statistical techniques to explore novel discoveries.

Conclusion

This study found a relative insufficiency in Mpox knowledge among university students, with less than half expressing concern about Mpox outbreak, and the majority exhibiting a positive attitude to vaccination. Meanwhile, the findings of this study stress that a high level of Mpox knowledge tends to be easier to improve students’ willingness to vaccinate against Mpox. Utilizing social media, publicity campaigns, lectures, and teaching techniques could effectively enhance students’ knowledge of Mpox. In addition, the introduction of foreign vaccines and the development of domestic vaccines should be included in the agenda by our country. What’s more, controlling with timely detection and isolation of symptomatic cases were also important ways to future outbreak of Mpox on college campuses. In conclusion, this study might help governments and schools to understand students’ Mpox perceptions and vaccination intentions. In the future, further research is warranted to comprehend the knowledge of Mpox and vaccination acceptance among university students nationwide. And there exists a necessity and urgency for governments and schools to effectively intervene to improve Mpox knowledge and vaccination acceptance among university students.

Author contributions

XQ and HZ conceived the study and designed the protocol. KW, BH, YL, WW, XZ, MZ conducted this study. JW drafted the manuscript. LF and HM performed processing and analyzes of the data. XQ, HZ, KW, BH, YL, YZ, BW, and WZ revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and informed consent statement

All procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration. Online informed consent will be obtained from all participants before any procedure of this study. The study (including online informed consent) was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University (approval number SYSU-PHS[2022]051).

Supplemental material

Supplementary Tables.docx

Download MS Word (12.2 KB)

Acknowledgments

We appreciate all the students that participated in this study. We thank all the schools that participated in this study, including Beijing University of Technology, the Capital University of Economics and Business, Capital Medical University, Jilin University, Harbin Medical University, Hebei Medical University, and Baotou Medical College. We thank the individuals who helped us recruit participants.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data collected in this study will not be publicly available. However, the corresponding author can be contacted for de-identified data and questionnaire upon reasonable request.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website at https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2339922.

Additional information

Funding

The article was funded by the 2021 Beijing Key Specialty Program for Major Epidemic Prevention and Control.

References

  • McCollum AM, Damon IK. Human monkeypox. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(2):260–11. doi:10.1093/cid/cit703.
  • Huang Y, Mu L, Wang W. Monkeypox: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and prevention. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):4261–4282. doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01215-4.
  • Organization WH. 2022-23 Mpox (Monkeypox) outbreak: global trends; 2023. https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/.
  • Benites-Zapata VA, Ulloque-Badaracco JR, Alarcon-Braga EA, Hernandez-Bustamante EA, Mosquera-Rojas MD, Bonilla-Aldana DK, Rodriguez-Morales AJ. Clinical features, hospitalisation and deaths associated with monkeypox: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2022;21(1):36. doi:10.1186/s12941-022-00527-1.
  • Kumar N, Acharya A, Gendelman HE, Byrareddy SN. The 2022 outbreak and the pathobiology of the monkeypox virus. J Autoimmun. 2022;131:102855. doi:10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102855.
  • Karagoz A, Tombuloglu H, Alsaeed M, Tombuloglu G, AlRubaish AA, Mahmoud A, Smajlović S, Ćordić S, Rabaan AA, Alsuhaimi E, et al. Monkeypox (mpox) virus: classification, origin, transmission, genome organization, antiviral drugs, and molecular diagnosis. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16(4):531–541. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2023.02.003.
  • Shah S, Fulmali D. Monkeypox: treatment, vaccination, and prevention. Cureus J Med Sci. 2023;15:e33434. doi:10.7759/cureus.33434.
  • Morand A, Delaigue S, Morand JJ. Review of poxvirus: emergence of monkeypox. Médecine et Santé Tropicales. 2017;27(1):29–39. doi:10.1684/mst.2017.0653.
  • Brown K, Leggat PA. Human Monkeypox: current state of knowledge and implications for the future. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2016;1(1):8. doi:10.3390/tropicalmed1010008.
  • Pinto P, Costa MA, Goncalves MFM, Rodrigues AG, Lisboa C. Mpox person-to-person transmission-where have we got so far? A systematic review. Viruses-Basel. 2023;15:1074. doi:10.3390/v15051074.
  • Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S, Rockstroh J, Antinori A, Harrison LB, Palich R, Nori A, Reeves I, Habibi MS, et al. Monkeypox virus infection in humans across 16 countries — April–June 2022. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(8):679–691. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2207323.
  • Guarner J, Del Rio C, Malani PN. Monkeypox in 2022—What clinicians need to know. JAMA. 2022;328(2):139. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.10802.
  • Zhao H, Wang W, Zhao L, Wu C. The first imported case of Monkeypox in the Mainland of China — Chongqing Municipality, China, September 16, 2022. China CDC Wkly. 2022;4:853–4. doi:10.46234/ccdcw2022.175.
  • Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023. https://www.chinacdc.cn/jkzt/crb/qt/szkb_13037/gwjszl_13092/202308/t20230809_268502.html.
  • Endo A, Jung S-M, Miura F. Mpox emergence in Japan: ongoing risk of establishment in Asia. Lancet. 2023;401:1923–1924. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00766-3.
  • Zhao T, Wu Z. Prevention of a potential mpox outbreak in China. Lancet. 2023;402(10407):1038–1039. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01793-2.
  • Qin Q, Guo W, Tang W, Mahapatra T, Wang L, Zhang N, Ding Z, Cai C, Cui Y, Sun J, et al. Spatial analysis of the human immunodeficiency virus epidemic among men who have sex with men in China, 2006–2015. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(7):956–963. doi:10.1093/cid/cix031.
  • Hu M, Xu C, Wang J. Spatiotemporal analysis of men who have sex with men in Mainland China: social app capture-recapture method. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8:e14800. doi:10.2196/14800.
  • Cong L, Ono-Kihara M, Xu G, Ma Q, Pan X, Zhang D, Homma T, Kihara M. The characterisation of sexual behaviour in Chinese male university students who have sex with other men: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8(1):250. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-250.
  • Fan S, Yang Z, Hou F, Yu M, Luo Z, Liao M, Gong Y, Meng X, Cai Y, Zou H, et al. HIV and syphilis and sexual risk behaviours among men who have sex with men attending university in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Health. 2019;16(6):554–565. doi:10.1071/SH18231.
  • Zou H, Xu J, Hu Q, Yu Y, Fu G, Wang Z, Lu L, Zhuang M, Chen X, Fu J, et al. Decreasing age at first anal intercourse among men who have sex with men in China: a multicentre cross‐sectional survey. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1):20792. doi:10.7448/IAS.19.1.20792.
  • Savinkina A, Chitwood M, Kwon J, Pitzer VEE, Gonsalves G, Paltiel AD. Planning for Mpox on a college campus: a model-based decision-support tool. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176(3):340–347. doi:10.7326/M22-2734.
  • Yang X, Yang X, Jiang W, Luo N, Hu Y, Yang Y, Yang X, Hou L, Zhang J, Hu C, et al. A cross-sectional investigation of factors influencing mpox vaccine hesitancy for students in Southwest China. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2024;20(1):2309704. doi:10.1080/21645515.2024.2309704.
  • Peng X, Wang B, Li Y, Chen Y, Wu X, Fu L, Sun Y, Liu Q, Lin Y-F, Liang B, et al. Perceptions and worries about monkeypox, and attitudes towards monkeypox vaccination among medical workers in China: a cross-sectional survey. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16(3):346–353. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2023.01.010.
  • Hong J, Pan B, Jiang H-J, Zhang Q-M, Xu X-W, Jiang H, Ye J-E, Cui Y, Yan X-J, Zhai X-F, et al. The willingness of Chinese healthcare workers to receive monkeypox vaccine and its independent predictors: a cross-sectional survey. J Med Virol. 2023;95(1):e28294. doi:10.1002/jmv.28294.
  • Wang B, Peng X, Li Y, Fu L, Tian T, Liang B, Sun Y, Chen Y, Wu X, Liu Q, et al. Perceptions, precautions, and vaccine acceptance related to monkeypox in the public in China: a cross-sectional survey. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16(2):163–170. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2022.12.010.
  • Ren F, Liu J, Miao J, Xu Y, Zhang R, Fan J, Lin W. Public awareness, specific knowledge, and worry about mpox (monkeypox): a preliminary community-based study in Shenzhen, China. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1077564. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1077564.
  • Dong C, Yu Z, Zhao Y, Ma X. Knowledge and vaccination intention of monkeypox in China’s general population: a cross-sectional online survey. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2023;52:102533. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102533.
  • Chen Y, Li Y, Fu L, Zhou X, Wu X, Wang B, Peng X, Sun Y, Liu Q, Lin Y-F, et al. Knowledge of human Mpox (Monkeypox) and attitude towards Mpox vaccination among male sex workers in China: a cross-sectional study. Vaccines. 2023;11(2):285. doi:10.3390/vaccines11020285.
  • Fu L, Sun Y, Li Y, Wang B, Yang L, Tian T, Wu X, Peng X, Liu Q, Chen Y, et al. Perception of and vaccine readiness towards Mpox among men who have sex with men living with HIV in China: a cross-sectional study. Vaccines. 2023;11(3):528. doi:10.3390/vaccines11030528.
  • Li P, Tang H, Li D, Ge L, Yu M, Lyu F. Current status of monkeypox cognition and related factors among men who have sex with men in China. Chin J Epidemiol. 2023;44:257–262.
  • Zheng M, Qian X, Yuan Z. Monkeypox-related knowledge and influencing factors among men who have sex with men in China: an online cross-sectional survey. China J Public Health. 2022;38:1538–1543.
  • Huang XJ, Lin ZF, Qin J, Yu D, Zhang F, Fang GG, Chen X, He J, Cen P, Li M, et al. Willingness to accept monkeypox vaccine and its correlates among men who have sex with men in Southern China: a web-based online cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1289918. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1289918.
  • Swed S, Bohsas H, Alibrahim H, Rakab A, Hafez W, Sawaf B, Amir RM, Motawei AS, Aljabali A, Shoib S, et al. Monkeypox post-COVID-19: knowledge, worrying, and vaccine adoption in the Arabic general population. Vaccines. 2023;11(4):759. doi:10.3390/vaccines11040759.
  • Sahin TK, Erul E, Aksun MS, Sonmezer MC, Unal S, Akova M. Knowledge anD attitudes of Turkish physicians towards human Monkeypox disease and related vaccination: a cross-sectional study. Vaccines. 2023;11:19. doi:10.3390/vaccines11010019.
  • Alkhaldi G, Aljuraiban GS, Alhurishi S, De Souza R, Lamahewa K, Lau R, Alshaikh F. Perceptions towards COVID-19 and adoption of preventive measures among the public in Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1251. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11223-8.
  • Kumar N, Ahmed F, Raza MS, Rajpoot PL, Rehman W, Khatri SA, Mohammed M, Muhammad S, Ahmad R. Monkeypox cross-sectional survey of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and willingness to vaccinate among university students in Pakistan. Vaccines. 2023;11:97. doi:10.3390/vaccines11010097.
  • Alshahrani NZ, Mitra S, Alkuwaiti AA, Alhumam MN, Altmimi SMB, Alamri MHM, Albalawi ZAS, Almorgi MW, Alharbi HKD, Alshahrani SM, et al. Medical students’ perception regarding the re-emerging Monkeypox virus: an institution-based cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia. Cureus J Med Sci. 2022;14:e28060. doi:10.7759/cureus.28060.
  • Ahmed S, Hassan MM, Khan F, Sultan A, Shah MS. The Mpox disease: awareness and apprehensions among the medical undergraduates and nursing staff. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2022;16:3155–3167. doi:10.22207/JPAM.16.SPL1.09.
  • Jairoun AA, Al-Hemyari SS, Abdulla NM, El-Dahiyat F, Shahwan M, Hassan N, Jairoun O, Alyousef NG, Sharif S, Jaber AAS, et al. Awareness and preparedness of human monkeypox outbreak among university student: time to worry or one to ignore? J Infect Public Health. 2022;15(10):1065–1071. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2022.08.015.
  • Ahmed SK, Abdulqadir SO, Omar RM, Abdullah AJ, Rahman HA, Hussein SH, Mohammed Amin HI, Chandran D, Sharma AK, Dhama K, et al. Knowledge, attitude and worry in the Kurdistan region of Iraq during the Mpox (Monkeypox) outbreak in 2022: an online cross-sectional study. Vaccines. 2023;11(3):610. doi:10.3390/vaccines11030610.
  • Chong YY, Chien WT, Cheng HY, Chow KM, Kassianos AP, Karekla M, Gloster A. The role of illness perceptions, coping, and self-efficacy on adherence to precautionary measures for COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6540. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186540.
  • Madhumathi J, Sinha R, Veeraraghavan B, Walia K. Use of “social media”—an option for spreading awareness in infection prevention. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis. 2021;13(1):14–31. doi:10.1007/s40506-020-00244-3.
  • Swed S, Alibrahim H, Bohsas H, Aljabali A, Almoshantaf MB, Sawaf B, Shoib S, Patwary MM, Albazee E, Lee KY, et al. Monkeypox in Syria: highlighting an awareness issue. IJID Reg. 2023;7:271–276. doi:10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.04.008.
  • Ibrahim AM, Zaghamir DEF. Knowledge and attitudes towards mpox and effect of intervention among college of applied medical sciences students. Libyan J Med. 2023;18(1):2222448. doi:10.1080/19932820.2023.2222448.
  • Lounis M, Riad A. Monkeypox (MPOX)-related knowledge and vaccination hesitancy in non-endemic countries: concise literature review. Vaccines. 2023;11(2):229. doi:10.3390/vaccines11020229.
  • Organization WH. Ten Threats to global health in 2019; 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019.
  • See KC. Vaccination for monkeypox virus infection in humans: a review of key considerations. Vaccines. 2022;10(8):1342. doi:10.3390/vaccines10081342.
  • Choi Y, Jeon E-B, Kim T, Choi SJ, Moon SM, Song K-H, Kim HB, Kim ES. Case report and literature review of occupational transmission of Monkeypox Virus to healthcare workers, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29:997–1001. doi:10.3201/eid2905.230028.
  • Organization WH. Smallpox; 2022. https://www.who.int/health-topics/smallpox#tab=tab_1.
  • Sallam M, Al-Mahzoum K, Dardas LA, Al-Tammemi AB, Al-Majali L, Al-Naimat H, Jardaneh L, AlHadidi F, Al-Salahat K, Al-Ajlouni E, et al. Knowledge of human Monkeypox and its relation to conspiracy beliefs among students in Jordanian Health Schools: filling the knowledge gap on emerging Zoonotic Viruses. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(7):924. doi:10.3390/medicina58070924.
  • Zeidan RK, Shukla A, Hussein A, AlZubaidi H, Temsah M-H, AlHajjaj MS, Al-Bluwi N, Awad M, Alsayed HAH, Saheb Sharif-Askari N, et al. Assessment of knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes during the global Mpox outbreak in June 2022: a cross-sectional study from the United Arab Emirates. Int J Public Health. 2023;68:1606080. doi:10.3389/ijph.2023.1606080.
  • Bronfman N, Repetto P, Cordón P, Castañeda J, Cisternas P. GendeR differences on psychosocial factors affecting COVID-19 preventive behaviors. Sustainability. 2021;13(11):6148. doi:10.3390/su13116148.
  • Barber SJ, Kim H, Isaacowitz D, Isaacowitz D. COVID-19 worries and behavior changes in older and younger men and women. J Gerontol B. 2021;76(2):17–23. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa068.
  • Fischer F, Bronfman NC, Cisternas PC, Repetto PB, Castañeda JV. Natural disaster preparedness in a multi-hazard environment: characterizing the sociodemographic profile of those better (worse) prepared. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0214249. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214249.
  • Bateman Julie M, Edwards B. Gender and evacuation: a closer look at why women are more likely to evacuate for Hurricanes. Nat Hazard Rev. 2002;3(3):107–117. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2002)3:3(107).
  • Magadmi RM, Kamel FO. Beliefs and barriers associated with COVID-19 vaccination among the general population in Saudi Arabia. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11501-5.
  • Lepelletier D, Pozzetto B, Chauvin F, Chidiac C. High council public Hlth Natl W. Management of patients with monkeypox virus infection and contacts in the community and in healthcare settings: a French position paper. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2022;28(12):1572–1577. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.018.