Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 Megill, “History’s Unresolving Tensions.”
2 Eskildsen, Modern Historiography, 10. Further references to this work will be made parenthetically in the text.
3 As for instance Beiser, The German Historicist Tradition, or Iggers, The German Conception of History, or nearly all the literature that preceded them.
4 On history of knowledge, history of science, and their relationship, see Marchand, “How much Knowledge.”
5 Assis, Plural Pasts, 55–9; see also van den Akker, The Exemplifying Past.
6 Paul, “Review.”
7 See Iggers, The German Conception of History, 63–5.
8 Grafton, The Footnote, 34–93.
9 See Blanke, Historiographiegeschichte, 84–110; Witschi-Bernz, “Main Trends.”
10 Quoted by Eskildsen, Modern Historiography, 22.
11 Assis, What is History For?, 10–12; Bouton, “Learning from History.”
12 Schiffman, “Renaissance Historicism Reconsidered,” 173.
13 Krol, “Review,” 780.
14 Jollivet, “Historicism.”
15 Mata “Outono da teoria?”, 95–7; Wittkau, Historismus, 73–9, 86–95.