26
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Quality of Published Clinical Trials on Asthma

, M.D., Ph.D., , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D., Ph.D. & , M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
Pages 709-719 | Published online: 13 Jan 2005
 

Abstract

The quality of 287 clinical trials on asthma treatment published between 1984 and 1997 is described in this article, using a scale adding to a maximum of 14 points. The mean quality score was 8.60 (standard deviation 1.55). Quality improved throughout time from 8.17 ± 1.40 before 1989 until 9.55 ± 1.66 after 1992. Several methodological issues were associated with higher quality, namely parallel design, longer length of the follow-up, complete description of the exclusion criteria, description of the initial and ending recruitment dates, higher sample size, explicit sample size calculation, blinding, full description of randomization, intention-to-treat analysis, full description of the intervention, and evaluation of bias. The higher statistical significance, however, was not associated with higher clinical trial quality.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.